Skip to main content
Log in

On normal Hankel matrices

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of characterizing normal Hankel matrices is still far from being solved completely. The partial results available are mainly the descriptions of certain subsets of the class of normal Hankel matrices. These subsets were found separately and using different arguments. This paper presents a general approach allowing, in particular, to obtain all the known subsets as special cases. Normal Hankel matrices outside of these subsets correspond to the main (and the most difficult) case of our treatment. At the moment, this case defies complete analysis. However, we show that unknown types of normal Hankel matrices can only be found within a new and very interesting matrix class that extends (and contains) the class of φ-circulants. Bibliography: 11 titles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kh. D. Ikramov, “Describing normal Toeplitz matrices,” Zh. Vychisl. Mat. Mat. Fiz., 34, 473–479 (1994).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Kh. D. Ikramov, “On the classification of normal Toeplitz matrices with real entries,” Mat. Zametki, 57, 670–680 (1995).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Kh. D. Ikramov and V. N. Chugunov, “A criterion for the normality of a comples Toeplitz matrix,” Zh. Vyschisl. Mat. Mat. Fiz., 36, 3–10 (1996).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. V. I. Gel’fgat, “A criterion for the normality of a Toeplitz matrix,” Zh. Vychisl. Mat. Mat. Fiz., 35, 1428–1432 (1995).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. D. R. Farenick et al., “Normal Toeplitz matrices,” SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 17, 1037–1043 (1996).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. K. Ito, “Every normal Toeplitz matrix is either of type I or of type II,” SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 17, 998–1006 (1996).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Arimoto, “A simple proof of the classification of normal Toeplitz matrices,” Electronic J. Linear Algebra, 9, 108–111 (2002).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Gu and L. Patton, “Commutation relations for Toeplitz and Hankel matrices,” SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 24, 728–746 (2003).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Kh. D. Ikramov, “On the problem of characterizing normal Hankel matrices,” Fundam. Prikl. Mat., 3, 809–819 (1997).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Kh. D. Ikramov and V. N. Chugunov, “On the skew-symmetric part of the product of Toeplitz matrices,” Mat. Zametki, 63, 138–141 (1998).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Kh. D. Ikramov and V. N. Chugunov, “On a new class of normal Hankel matrices,” Vestnik Mosk. Gos. Univ., Ser. 15. Vychisl. Mat. Kibern., No. 1, 10–13 (2007).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kh. D. Ikramov.

Additional information

__________

Translated from Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI, Vol. 346, 2007, pp. 63–80.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ikramov, K.D., Chugunov, V.N. On normal Hankel matrices. J Math Sci 150, 1951–1960 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-008-0110-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-008-0110-4

Keywords

Navigation