Skip to main content
Log in

Discrete Convexity

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the paper, we explain what subsets of the lattice n and what functions on the lattice n could be called convex. The basis of our theory is the following three main postulates of classical convex analysis: concave functions are closed under sums; they are also closed under convolutions; and the superdifferential of a concave function is nonempty at each point of the domain. Interesting (and even dual) classes of discrete concave functions arise if we require either the existence of superdifferentials and closeness under convolutions or the existence of superdifferentials and closeness under sums. The corresponding classes of convex sets are obtained as the affinity domains of such discretely concave functions. The classes of the first type are closed under (Minkowski) sums, and the classes of the second type are closed under intersections. In both classes, the separation theorem holds true. Unimodular sets play an important role in the classification of such classes. The so-called polymatroidal discretely concave functions, most interesting for applications, are related to the unimodular system \(\mathbb{A}_n : = \{ \pm e_i ,e_i - e_j \}\). Such functions naturally appear in mathematical economics, in Gelfand-Tzetlin patterns, play an important role for solution of the Horn problem, for describing submodule invariants over discrete valuation rings, and so on. Bibliography: 6 titles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. V. I. Danilov and G. A. Koshevoy, “Discrete convexity and unimodularity. I,” Adv. Math., 189, 301–324 (2004); http://arXiv.org/math.CO/0304291.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. V. Danilov, G. Koshevoy, and K. Murota, “Discrete convexity and equilibria in economies with indivisible goods and money,” Math. Social Sci., 41, 251–273 (2001).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. K. Murota, Discrete Convex Analysis, SIAM, Philadelphia (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. I. Danilov and G. A. Koshevoy, “Discrete convexity and nilpotent operators,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk Ser. Mat., 67, 3–20 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. I. Danilov and V. P. Grishukhin, “Maximal unimodular systems of vectors,” European J. Combin., 120, 509–526 (1999).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. V. I. Danilov and G. A. Koshevoy, “Dicrete convexity and Hermitian operators,” Proc. Steklov Inst. Math., 241, 68–90 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

__________

Translated from Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI, Vol. 312, 2004, pp. 86–93.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Danilov, V.I., Koshevoy, G.A. Discrete Convexity. J Math Sci 133, 1418–1421 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-006-0057-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-006-0057-2

Keywords

Navigation