Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Decision Making and Optimization in Changeable Spaces, a New Paradigm

  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a new decision making/optimization paradigm, the decision making/optimization in changeable spaces (DM/OCS). The unique feature of DM/OCS is that it incorporates human psychology and its dynamics as part of the decision making process and allows the restructuring of the decision parameters. DM/OCS is based on Habitual Domain theory, the decision parameters, the concept of competence set, and the mental operators 7-8-9 principles of deep knowledge. The covering and discovering processes are formulated as DM/OCS problems. Some illustrative examples of challenging problems that cannot be solved by traditional decision making/optimization techniques are formulated as DM/OCS problems and solved. In addition, some directions of research related to innovation dynamics, management, artificial intelligence, artificial and e-economics, scientific discovery, and knowledge extraction are provided in the conclusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Luce, R.D., Raiffa, H.: Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. Wiley, New York (1957)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Dantzig, G.B.: Linear Programming and Extensions. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bazaraa, M.S., Sherali, H.D., Shetty, C.M.: Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms. Wiley-Interscience, New York (2006)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Steuer, R.E.: Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation and Application. Wiley, New York (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Ehrgott, M., Gandibleux, X.: Multiple Criteria Optimization: State of the Art Annotated Bibliographic Surveys. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shapiro, A., Dentcheva, D., Ruszczyński, A.: Lectures on Stochastic Programming: Modeling and Theory. MPS/SIAM Series on Optimization, vol. 9. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (2009)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Slowinski, R., Teghem, J.: Stochastic Versus Fuzzy Approaches to Multiobjective Mathematical Programming Under Uncertainty. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1990)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Bellman, R., Zadeh, L.A.: Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Manag. Sci. 17(4), 141–164 (1970)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Zimmermann, H.J.: Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Application. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Sakawa, M., Nishizaki, I., Katagiri, H.: Fuzzy Stochastic Multiobjective Programming. International Series in Operations Research and Management Sciences, vol. 159. Springer, Berlin (2011)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Yu, P.L., Larbani, M.: Two-person second-order games, Part 1: formulation and transition anatomy. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 141(3), 619–639 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Yu, P.L.: Habitual Domains and Forming Winning Strategies. NCTU Press, Hsinchu (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yu, P.L., Chen, Y.C.: Blinds, fuzziness and habitual domain tools in decision making with changeable spaces. Hum. Syst. Manag. 29(4), 231–242 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yu, P.L.: Forming Winning Strategies, an Integrated Theory of Habitual Domains. Springer, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yu, P.L.: Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Concepts, Techniques and Extensions. Plenum, New York (1985)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu, P.L.: Habitual Domains: Freeing Yourself from the Limits on Your Life. Highwater Editions, Kansas City (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yu, P.L., Chen, Y.C.: Dynamic multiple criteria decision making in changeable spaces: from habitual domains to innovation dynamics. Ann. Oper. Res. (2010). doi:10.1007/s10479-010-0750-x

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yu, P.L.: Habitual domains. Oper. Res. 39(6), 869–876 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chan, S.J., Yu, P.L.: Stable habitual domains: existence and implications. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 110(2), 469–482 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Yu, P.L.: Understanding Behaviors and Forming Winning Strategies. School of Business, University of Kansas, Lawrence (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yu, P.L., Zhang, D.: Competence set analysis for effective decision making. Control Theory Adv. Technol. 5(4), 523–547 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yu, P.L., Zhang, D.: A foundation for competence set analysis. Math. Soc. Sci. 20(3), 251–299 (1990)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Yu, P.L., Zhang, D.: A marginal analysis for competence set expansion. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 76(1), 87–109 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Osinga, S., Hofstede, G.J., Verwaart, T.: Emergent Results of Artificial Economics. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Springer, Berlin (2011)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Larbani, M., Yu, P.L.: Two-person second-order games, part II: restructuring operations to reach a win-win profile. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 141, 641–659 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Larbani, M., Yu, P.L.: n-Person second-order games: a paradigm shift in game theory. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 149(3), 447–473 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Shoham, Y.: An overview of agent-oriented programming. In: Bradshaw, J.M. (ed.) Software Agents, pp. 271–290. AAAI Press/MIT Press, Menlo Park (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Serenko, A., Detlor, B.: Intelligent agents as innovations. Artif. Intell. Soc. 18, 364–381 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Russell, S., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Batten, D.F.: Discovering Artificial Economics, How Agents Learn and Economies Evolve. Westview Press, Boulder (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  31. LiCalzi, M., Milone, L., Pellizzari, P.: Progress in Artificial Economics. Lecture Notes in Mathematical Systems, vol. 645. Springer, Berlin (2010)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Wagman, M.: Scientific Discovery Process in Human and Computer, Theory and Research in Psychology and Artificial Intelligence. Praeger, Westport (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Honavar, V.: Principles of artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence Research, Laboratory Center for Computational Intelligence, Learning, and Discovery, Department of Computer Science. Iowa State University (2006)

  34. McGarry, K.: A survey of interestingness measures for knowledge discovery. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 20(1), 39–61 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Po Lung Yu.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 4 Four hypotheses of brain operation
Table 5 Four hypotheses of mind operation

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Larbani, M., Yu, P.L. Decision Making and Optimization in Changeable Spaces, a New Paradigm. J Optim Theory Appl 155, 727–761 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-012-0103-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-012-0103-9

Keywords

Navigation