Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications

, Volume 152, Issue 1, pp 225–244 | Cite as

Optimal Keyword Bids in Search-Based Advertising with Stochastic Advertisement Positions

Article

Abstract

US expenditures on search-based advertising exceeded $12 billion in 2010. Advertisers bid for keywords, where bid price determines ad placement, affecting click-through and conversion rates. Advertisers must select keywords, allocating each a proportion of their fixed daily budget. In this paper, we construct a stochastic model for the selection and allocation process. We provide analytical results for the single-keyword problem and examine the multiple-keyword problem numerically. We investigate trade-offs between keywords given varying levels of risk and return. We show the implications of enforcing a probabilistic budget constraint. Our paper provides a critical analysis of the advertiser’s problem that may guide future research.

Keywords

Search-based advertising Budget optimization Probabilistic models 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

10957_2011_9886_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (144 kb)
(PDF 143 kB)

References

  1. 1.
    US Census Bureau. Retail trade sales-total and e-commerce by kind of business (2007). Available at http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2010/tables/10s1021.pdf. Accessed March 29, 2011
  2. 2.
    Emarketer.com. US online advertising spending 2008–2014 (2010). Available from http://www.emarketer.com/Reports/All/Emarketer_2000693.aspx. Accessed March 29, 2011
  3. 3.
    Jansen, J.B., Mullen, T.: Sponsored search: An overview of the concept, history and technology. Int. J. Electron. Bus. 6(2), 114–131 (2008) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Özlük, Ö.: Search engine advertising: An overview from a revenue management angle. Manuscript in progress, Department of Decision Sciences, San Francisco State University (2010) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fain, D., Pedersen, J.: Sponsored search: A brief history. Bull. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 32(2), 12–13 (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Google.com. Ad position and quality: Adwords help (2010). Available from http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/topic.py?hl=en&topic=15977. Accessed March 29, 2011
  7. 7.
    Edelman, B., Ostrovsky, M., Schwarz, M.: Internet advertising and the generalized second-price auction: Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords. Am. Econ. Rev. 97(1), 242–259 (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yang, S., Ghose, A.: Analyzing the relationship between organic and sponsored search advertising: Positive, negative, or zero interdependence? Mark. Sci. 29(4), 602–623 (2010) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Abrams, Z., Mendelevitch, O., Tomlin, J.: Optimal delivery of sponsored search advertisements subject to budget constraints. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, San Diego, California, USA, pp. 272–278 (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rusmevichientong, P., Williamson, D.P.: An adaptive algorithm for selecting profitable keywords for search-based advertising services. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 260–269 (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Feng, J., Bhargava, H.K., Pennock, D.M.: Implementing sponsored search in web search engines: Computational evaluation of alternative mechanisms. INFORMS J. Comput. 19(1), 137–148 (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fruchter, G.E., Dou, W.: Optimal budget allocation over time for keyword ads in web portals. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 124(1), 157–174 (2005) CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Muthukrishnan, S., Pál, M., Svitkina, Z.: Stochastic models for budget optimization in search-based advertising. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4858/2007, pp. 131–142 (2007) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brooks, N.: Atlas rank report: How search engine rank impacts traffic (2004). Available at www.atlassolutions.com/pdf/rankreport.pdf and www.atlassolutions.com/pdf/rankreportpart2.pdf. Accessed March 29, 2011
  15. 15.
    Regelson, M., Fain, D.: Predicting click-through rate using keyword clusters. In: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Sponsored Search Auctions, p. 6 (2006) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Özlük, Ö., Cholette, S.: Allocating expenditures across keywords in search advertising. J. Revenue Pricing Manag. 6(4), 347–356 (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Feldman, J., Muthukrishnan, S., Pal, M., Stein, C.: Budget optimization in search-based advertising auctions. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, San Diego, California, USA, pp. 40–49 (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhou, Y., Chakrabarty, D., Lukose, R.: Budget constrained bidding in keyword auctions and online knapsack problems. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5385/2008, pp. 566–576 (2008) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maplesoft. Maple 13: The Essential Tool for Mathematics and Modeling. Maplesoft, a Divison of Waterloo Maple, Inc. (2009). www.maplesoft.com
  20. 20.
    Parlar, M.: Interactive Operations Research with Maple: Methods and Models. Birkhäuser, Boston (2000) CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Grappone, J., Couzin, G.: Search Engine Optimization: An Hour a Day. Wiley, Indianapolis (2006) Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cary, M., Das, A., Edelman, B., Giotis, I., Heimerl, K., Karlin, A., Mathieu, C., Schwarz, M.: Greedy bidding strategies for keyword auctions. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce San Diego, California, USA, pp. 262–271 (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Borgs, C., Chayes, J., Etesami, O., Immorlica, N., Jain, K., Mahdian, M.: Dynamics of bid optimization in online advertisement auctions. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, Banff, Alberta, Canada, pp. 262–271 (2007) Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Richardson, M., Dominowska, E., Ragno, R.: Predicting clicks: Estimating the click-through rate for new ads. In: WWW ’07: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, New York, NY, USA, pp. 521–530. ACM, New York (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Luenberger, D.G.: Linear and Nonlinear Programming. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1984) MATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Edgar, T.F., Himmelblau, D.M., Lasdon, L.S.: Optimization of Chemical Processes, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, Boston (2001) Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Paul, S.: Applications of the beta distribution. In: Gupta, A., Nadarajah, S. (eds.) Handbook of Beta Distribution and Its Application, pp. 423–440. Dekker, New York (2004) Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Keefer, D., Verdini, W.: Better estimation of PERT activity time parameters. Manag. Sci. 39(9), 1086–1091 (1993) CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan Cholette
    • 1
  • Özgür Özlük
    • 1
  • Mahmut Parlar
    • 2
  1. 1.San Francisco State UniversitySan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.DeGroote School of BusinessMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations