Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

e-Homework and Motivation for Students’ Success in First-Semester General Chemistry

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contributed data reflective of students’ compliance in doing electronic homework (e-HW) exercises when asked to choose when required e-HW assignments are due are evaluated using a quasi-experimental format with non-equivalent groups to determine if first-semester general chemistry (Chem I) students (N = 273) will academically benefit from improved e-HW completion rates. The three groups studied are categorized under their VOICES (Voluntary Options in Chemical Education Schedules). Evaluated for each VOICES group are (1) results of students’ procedural arithmetic ability without the use of a calculating device as determined by their scores on the MUST (Math-Up Skills Test) and (2) outcomes of e-HW due-date compliance and achievement compared to final course averages. Students who entered with below average MUST scores were the least successful course completers (increased percentage of D/F grades) as compared to those in the average or above average MUST score ranges. Students who followed the instructor’s predetermined schedule (VOICES 1) outperformed the other groups of students who chose due dates based on personal preferences. A higher percentage of VOICES 1 achieved e-HW mastery level of 89.5% than VOICES 2 (individual choice of e-HW due dates) and VOICES 3 (e-HW due at end of semester). Students who selected their own e-HW due dates entered with less automaticity ability and completed the course with lower averages, but without statistical difference. Students regardless of the VOICES group who completed at least 69.5% of their e-HW showed greater course success (i.e., grades of A, B, or C) than those who did not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Deidentified student data are available from the corresponding author upon written request.

Notes

  1. https://www.macmillanlearning.com/college/us/digital/achieve

References

  • Albaladejo, J. D. P., Broadway, S., Mamiya, B., Petros, A., Powell, C. B., Shelton, G. R., Walker, D. R., Weber, R., Williamson, V. M., & Mason, D. (2018). Conf Chem Conference on Mathematics in Undergraduate Chemistry Instruction: MUST-Know Pilot Study—Math Preparation Study from Texas. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(8), 1428–1429. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00096

  • Alivio, T. E. G., Howard, E. H., Mamiya, B., & Williamson, V. M. (2020). How does a math review impact a student’s arithmetic skills and performance in first-semester general chemistry? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(6), 703–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09851-7

  • Ames, C., & Ames, R. (1989). Research in motivation in education (Vol. 3). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J., & Raynor, O. (1974). Motivation and achievement. Washington: Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanc, R. A., DeBuhr, L. E., & Martin, D. C. (1983). Breaking the attrition cycle: The effects of Supplemental Instruction on undergraduate performance and attrition. Journal of Higher Education, 54(1), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1983.11778153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodenstedt, K., Dubrovskiy, A., Lee, K., Rix, B., & Mason, D. (2022). Impact of Students’ Automaticity Ability on their Success in O-Chem I. Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, 42(1). https://doi.org/10.26717/BJSTR.2022.42.006700, https://biomedres.us/pdfs/BJSTR.MS.ID.006700.pdf

  • Brooks, D. W., & Shell, D. F. (2006). Working memory, motivation, and teacher-initiated learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosio, M. N., & Williamson, V. M. (2019). Timing of homework completion vs. performance in general chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(5), 523–531.

  • Dubrovskiy, A., Broadway, S., Jang, B., Mamiya, B., Powell, C. B., Shelton, G. R., Walker, D. R., Weber, R., Williamson, V., Villalta-Cerdas, A., & Mason, D. (2022). Is the gender gap closing? Journal of Research in Science Mathematics and Technology Education, 5(1), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.512

  • Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The acquisition of expert performance: an introduction to some of the issues. The Road to Excellence (pp. 1–50). Psychology Press.

  • Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, 38(685–705), 2–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., Chase, W. G., & Faloon, S. (1980). Acquisition of a memory skill. Science, 208(4448), 1181–1182. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7375930

  • Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasser, W. (1997). A new look at school failure and school success. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(8), 596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, D. M., & Semb, G. B. (1978). Instructor-set pacing contingencies versus the absence of such contingencies in a personalized university course. Journal of Personalized Instruction, 3, 131–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, J. A. R., & Nelson, E. A. (2016). Automaticity in computation and student success in introductory physical science courses. Cornell University Library. Retrieved  May 14, 2022, from arXiv:1608.05006v2 [physics.ed-ph] Paper presented as part of Chemistry & Cognition: Support for Cognitive-Based First-Year Chemistry, 2016. Link to quiz: http://bit.ly/1HyamPc

  • Hartman, J. R., Nelson, E. A., & Kirschner, P. A. (2022). Improving student success in chemistry through cognitive science. Foundations of Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-022-09427-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, F. S. (1967). Engineering personalized instruction in the classroom. Journal of Psychology, 1(3). https://journal.sipsych.org/index.php/IJP/article/view/445

  • Lee, K. S., Rix, B., & Spivey, M. Z. (2023). Predictions of Success in Organic Chemistry Based on a Mathematics Skills Test and Academic Achievement. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RP00140C

  • Mamiya, B., Powell, C. B., Shelton, G. R., Dubrovskiy, A., Villalta-Cerdas, A., Broadway, S., Weber, R., & Mason, D. (2022). Influence of Environmental Factors on Success of At-Risk Hispanic Students in First-Semester General Chemistry. Journal of College Science Teaching, 51(4), 46–57.

  • Petros, A., Weber, R., Broadway, S., Ford, R., Powell, C., Hunter, K., Williamson, V., Walker, D., Mamiya, B., Del Pilar, J., Shelton, G. R., & Mason, D. (2017). 4 MUST-Know Pilot—Math Preparation Study from Texas. ACS DivCHED CCCE (Committee on Computers in Chemical Education) online conference organized by Cary Kilner and Eric Nelson. Retrieved May 14, 2022, from https://confchem.ccce.divched.org/content/2017fallconfchemp2

  • Powell, C. B., Pamplin, K. L., Blake, R. E., & Mason, D. S. (2010). Summer professional development in chemistry for inservice teachers using OWL Quick Prep. Journal of Science Education Technology, 19, 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9186-y

  • Powell, C. B., Simpson, J., Williamson, V. M., Dubrovskiy, A., Walker, D. R., Jang, B., Shelton, G. R., & Mason, D. (2020). Impact of arithmetic automaticity on students' success in second-semester general chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21, 1028–1041. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00006J

  • Semb, G. B., Conyers, D., Spencer, R., & Sanchez-Sosa, J. J. (1975). An experimental comparison of four pacing contingencies. In J. M. Johnston (Ed)., Behavior Research and Technology in Higher Education (pp. 348–368). Springfield, IL: Thomas.

  • Shell D. F., Brooks D. W., Trainin G., Wilson K. M., Kauffman D. F., & Herr, L. M. (2010). The unified learning model, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, G. R., Mamiya, B., Walker, D. R., Weber, R., Powell, C. A., Villalta-Cerdas, A., Dubrovskiy, A. V., Jang, B., & Mason, D. (2021). Early Warning Signals from Automaticity Diagnostic Instruments for First- and Second-Semester General Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 98, 3061–3072. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00714

  • Tomlinson, C. A. (2000). Reconcilable differences? Standards-based teaching and differentiation. Educational Leadership, 58(1), 6–11. https://www.scinapse.io/papers/1559308842

  • Villalta-Cerdas, A., Dubrovskiy, A., Mamiya, B., Walker, D. R., Powell, C. B., Broadway, S., Weber, R., Shelton, G. R., & Mason, D. (2022). Personal characteristics influencing college readiness of Hispanic students in a STEM gateway course: first-semester general chemistry. Journal of College Science Teaching, 51(5), 31–41. 

  • Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.

  • Williamson, V. M., Walker, D. R., Chuu, E., Broadway, S., Mamiya, B., Powell, C. M., Shelton, G. R., Weber, R., Dabney, A. R., & Mason, D. (2020). Impact of basic arithmetic skills on success in first-semester general chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00077A

  • Weber, R., Powell, C. B., Williamson, V., Mamiya, B., Walker, D. R., Dubrovskiy, A., Shelton, G. R., Villalta-Cerdas, A., Jang, B., Broadway, S., & Mason, D. (2020). Relationship between academic preparation in general chemistry and potential careers. Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, 32(5), 25,311–25,323. https://doi.org/10.26717/BJSTR.2020.32.005312

  • Willis, W. K., Williamson, V. M., Chuu, E., & Dabney, A. R. (2022). The relationship between a student’s success in first-semester general chemistry and their mathematics fluency, profile, and performance on common questions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31, 1–15.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate and thank Dr. Ellen Verdel for her review effort and suggestions to improve this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, 76203-5070, USA

    Robyn Ford, Susan Broadway & Diana Mason

Authors
  1. Robyn Ford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susan Broadway
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Diana Mason
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diana Mason.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in these studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The research used large-scale secondary datasets. No data are traceable to individual participants.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ford, R., Broadway, S. & Mason, D. e-Homework and Motivation for Students’ Success in First-Semester General Chemistry. J Sci Educ Technol 32, 433–443 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10036-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10036-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation