Alonzo, A. C., & Gotwals, A. W. (2012). Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions. SensePublishers.
Assaraf, O. B. Z., & Orion, N. (2005). Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 518–560. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20061
Bazeley, P. (2009). Analysing qualitative data: More than ‘identifying themes.’ Malaysian Journal of Qualitative Research, 2, 6–22.
Berland, L. K., Schwarz, C. V., Krist, C., Kenyon, L., Lo, A. S., & Reiser, B. J. (2015). Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching., 53, 1082–1112. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21257
Bernstein, J., & Kemp, K. (2020). The role of spatial science in environmental case studies: A special collection from the University of Southern California. Case Studies in the Environment, 4(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1525/cse.2019.sc.948362
Cady, S. L., Blok, M., Grosse, K., & Wells, J. (2015). The Evolution of Project NANO: A Program that Enables Students to Explore in Real Time Several Crosscutting Concepts of the Next Generation Science Standards. Microscopy and Microanalysis, 21, 479–480. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927615003190
Coffey, T., Zsuppan, G., & Corbin, R. (2015). Exploring nanoscience and scanning electron microscopy in K–12 classrooms. Microscopy Today, 23(1), 44–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1551929514001321
Corcoran, T., Mosher, F. A., & Rogat, A. (2009). Learning progressions in science: An evidence-based approach to reform. CPRE Research Reports. https://doi.org/10.12698/cpre.2009.rr63
Crujeiras-Pérez, B., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2017). High school students’ engagement in planning investigations: Findings from a longitudinal study in Spain. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18, 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00185H
Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01038.x
Dickes, A. C., Kamarainen, A., Metcalf, S. J., Gün-Yildiz, S., Brennan, K., Grotzer, T., & Dede, C. (2019). Scaffolding ecosystems science practice by blending immersive environments and computational modeling. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2181–2202. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12806
diSessa, A. A. (2004). Metarepresentation: Native competence and targets for instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 293–331. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2203_2
Duin, R. P., & Pękalska, E. (2007). The science of pattern recognition. Achievements and perspectives. In Duch W. & Mańdziuk J. (Eds.) Challenges for Computational Intelligence, Vol 63. (pp. 221–259). Berlin Heidelberg:Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71984-7_10
Duncan, R. G., & Rivet, A. E. (2013). Science learning progressions. Science, 339(6118), 396–397. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1228692
Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32, 268–291. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07309371
Duschl, R. A. (2019). Learning progressions: Framing and designing coherent sequences for STEM education. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0005-x
Duschl, R. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Planning and carrying out investigations: An entry to learning and to teacher professional development around NGSS science and engineering practices. International Journal of STEM Education, 1, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-014-0012-6
Duschl, R., Maeng, S., & Sezen, A. (2011). Learning progressions and teaching sequences: A review and analysis. Studies in Science Education, 47(2), 123–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.604476
Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. (2014). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education. Springer, Netherlands.
Evagorou, M., Erduran, S., & Mäntylä, T. (2015). The role of visual representations in scientific practices: From conceptual understanding and knowledge generation to ‘seeing’ how science works. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0024-x
Farris, A. V., Dickes, A. C., & Sengupta, P. (2019). Learning to interpret measurement and motion in fourth grade computational modeling. Science & Education, 28(8), 927–956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00069-7
Ford, M. (2008). Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning. Science Education, 92(3), 404–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20263
Granshaw, F., & Duggan-Haas, D. (2012). Virtual fieldwork in geoscience teacher education: Issues, techniques and Models. In Whitmeyer, S.J. (Eds.) Google Earth and Virtual Visualizations in Geoscience Education and Research. (pp. 285–304). Geological Society of America Special Papers, 492. https://doi.org/10.1130/2012.2492(21)
Harrower, M., MacEachren, A., & Griffin, A. L. (2000). Developing a geographic visualization tool to support earth science learning. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 27, 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1559/152304000783547759
Harwood, W. S. (2004). A new model for inquiry: Is the scientific method dead? Journal of College Science Teaching, 33(7), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/155335060501200218
Harwood, D., & Usher, M. (1999). Assessing progression in primary children’s map drawing skills. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 8, 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382049908667613
Hegerl, G. C., Zwiers, F. W., Braconnot, P., Gillett, N. P., Luo. Y., Marengo Orsini, J. A., Nicholls, N., Penner, J. E., & Stott, P. A. (2007). Understanding and attributing climate change. In Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K.B., Tignor, M., & Miller, H.L. (Eds.) Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. (pp. 663–745). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. hal-03375749f.
Hofstein, A., Shore, R., & Kipnis, M. (2004). Providing high school chemistry students with opportunities to develop learning skills in an inquiry-type laboratory: A case study. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000070342
Hubber, P., Tytler, R., & Haslam, F. (2010). Teaching and learning about force with a representational focus: Pedagogy and teacher change. Research in Science Education, 40, 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9154-9
Iedema, R. (2001). Resemiotization. Semiotica, 137, 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2001.106
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Crujeiras, B. (2016), Epistemic practices and Scientific practices in science education. In Taber K. S. & Akpan B. (Eds.). Science education: An international course companion (pp. 69–80). The Netherlands: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-749-8_5
Jones, M. G., Andre, T., Superfine, R., & Taylor, R. (2003). Learning at the nanoscale: The impact of students’ use of remote microscopy on concepts of viruses, scale, and microscopy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10078
Jones, M. G., & Taylor, A. R. (2009). Developing a sense of scale: Looking backward. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20288
Jones, M. G., Taylor, A., Minogue, J., Broadwell, B., Wiebe, E., & Carter, G. (2007). Understanding scale: Powers of ten. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16, 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-9034-2
Jones, M. G., Tretter, T., Taylor, A., & Oppewal, T. (2008). Experienced and novice teachers’ concepts of spatial scale. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 409–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701416624
Kamarainen, A. M., Metcalf, S., Grotzer, T., & Dede, C. (2015). Exploring ecosystems from the inside: How immersive multi-user virtual environments can support development of epistemologically grounded modeling practices in ecosystem science instruction. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(2), 148–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9531-7
Kastens, K. A., & Ishikawa, T. (2006). Spatial thinking in the geosciences and cognitive sciences: A cross-disciplinary look at the intersection of the two fields. In Meduca, C.A. & Mogk, D.W. (Eds.) Earth and mind: How geologists think and learn about the Earth, (pp. 53–76). Geological Society of America Special Papers, 413. https://doi.org/10.1130/2006.2413(05)
Kelly, G. J., & Licona, P. (2018). Epistemic practices and science education. In Matthews, M.R. (Ed.). History, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 139–165). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62616-1_5
Ketelhut, D. J., Nelson, B. C., Clarke, J., & Dede, C. (2010). A multi-user virtual environment for building and assessing higher order inquiry skills in science. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01036.x
Klein, P. D., & Kirkpatrick, L. C. (2010). Multimodal literacies in science: Currency, coherence and focus. Research in Science Education, 40, 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9159-4
Klippel, A., Zhao, J., Oprean, D., Wallgrün, J. O., Stubbs, C., La Femina, P., & Jackson, K. L. (2020). The value of being there: Toward a science of immersive virtual field trips. Virtual Reality, 24(4), 753–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00418-5
Kozma, R. (2003). The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13, 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00021-X
Kozma, R. B., & Russell, J. (1997). Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 949–968. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199711)34:9%3c949::AID-TEA7%3e3.0.CO;2-U
Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 313–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.1998.9672057
Krajcik, J., Codere, S., Dahsah, C., Bayer, R., & Mun, K. (2014). Planning instruction to meet the intent of the Next Generation Science Standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9383-2
Kress, G. (2009). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
Kress, G. R., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. Continuum.
Landauer, M., Juhola, S., & Klein, J. (2019). The role of scale in integrating climate change adaptation and mitigation in cities. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(5), 741–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1430022
Lemke, J. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 87–113). Routledge.
Lewandowsky, S., Herrmann, D. J., Behrens, J. T., Li, S. C., Pickle, L., & Jobe, J. B. (1993). Perception of clusters in statistical maps. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7, 533–551. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350070606
Liben, L. S., & Yekel, C. A. (1996). Preschoolers’ understanding of plan and oblique maps: The role of geometric and representational correspondence. Child Development, 67, 2780–2796. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01888.x
Liu, L., & Jackson, T. (2019). A recent review of learning progressions in science: Gaps and shifts. The Educational Review, USA, 3(9), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.26855/er.2019.09.001
MacDonald, S. P. (2019). Visualization and analysis of environmental data. In Lansiquot, R. D., & MacDonald, S. P. (Eds.). Interdisciplinary perspectives on virtual place-based learning. (pp. 69–81). Palgrave Pivot Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32471-1_5
MacEachren, A. M. (1991). The role of maps in spatial knowledge acquisition. The Cartographic Journal, 28, 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1179/000870491787859223
MacLeod, M. (2018). What makes interdisciplinarity difficult? Some consequences of domain specificity in interdisciplinary practice. Synthese, 195(2), 697–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1236-4
Mead, C., Buxner, S., Bruce, G., Taylor, W., Semken, S., & Anbar, A. D. (2019). Immersive, interactive virtual field trips promote science learning. Journal of Geoscience Education, 67(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2019.1565285
Metcalf, S. J., Reilly, J. M., Kamarainen, A. M., King, J., Grotzer, T. A., & Dede, C. (2018). Supports for deeper learning of inquiry-based ecosystem science in virtual environments-comparing virtual and physical concept mapping. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 459–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.018
Miller, E., Manz, E., Russ, R., Stroupe, D., & Berland, L. (2018). Addressing the epistemic elephant in the room: Epistemic agency and the next generation science standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 1053–1075. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21459
Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction-what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347
Mohan, L., Chen, J., & Anderson, C. W. (2009). Developing a multi-year learning progression for carbon cycling in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 675–698. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20314
Moysey, S. M., & Lazar, K. B. (2019). Using virtual reality as a tool for field-based learning in the earth sciences. In Lansiquot, R. D., & MacDonald, S. P. (Eds.). Interdisciplinary perspectives on virtual place-based learning. (pp. 99–126). Palgrave Pivot Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32471-1_7
National Research Council (NRC). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2002). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting themes, and core ideas. The National Academies Press.
Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.
Nyman, M., & Clair, T. S. (2016). A geometric model to teach nature of science, science practices, and metacognition. Journal of College Science Teaching, 45(5), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst16_045_05_44
Oliveira, A., Feyzi Behnagh, R., Ni, L., Mohsinah, A. A., Burgess, K. J., & Guo, L. (2019). Emerging technologies as pedagogical tools for teaching and learning science: A literature review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.141
Osborne, J. F., Henderson, J. B., MacPherson, A., Szu, E., Wild, A., & Yao, S. Y. (2016). The development and validation of a learning progression for argumentation in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(6), 821–846. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21316
Petcovic, H. L., & Libarkin, J. C. (2007). Research in science education: The expert-novice continuum. Journal of Geoscience Education, 55(4), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2007.12028060
Peterson, M. P. (1985). Evaluating a map’s image. The American Cartographer, 12, 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1559/152304085783914659
Piatek, J. L., Beatty, C. L. K., Beatty, W. L., Wizevich, M. C., & Steullet, A. (2012). Developing virtual field experiences for undergraduates with high-resolution panoramas (GigaPans) at multiple scales. In Whitmeyer, S.J. (Eds.) Google Earth and virtual visualizations in geoscience education and research, (pp. 305–313). Geological Society of America Special Papers, 492. https://doi.org/10.1130/2012.2492(21)
Pierson, A. E., & Clark, D. B. (2019). Sedimentation of modeling practices. Science & Education, 28(8), 897–925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00050-4
Pierson, A. E., Clark, D. B., & Kelly, G. J. (2019). Learning progressions and science practices. Science & Education, 28(8), 833–841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00070-0
Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89, 634–656. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20065
Schwarz, C., Reiser, B. J., Acher, A., Kenyon, L., & Fortus, D. (2012). MoDeLS: Challenges in defining a learning progression for scientific modeling. In Alonzo A. & W. Gotwals (Eds.), Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions. (pp. 101–137). SensePublishers, Rotterdam https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-824-7_6
Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Achér, A., Fortus, D., Shwartz, Y., Hug, B., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632–654. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20311
Shah, P., & Hoeffner, J. (2002). Review of graph comprehension research: Implications for instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013180410169
Shekhar, S., Evans, M. R., Kang, J. M., & Mohan, P. (2011). Identifying patterns in spatial information: A survey of methods. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 1, 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.25
Sikorski, T. R. (2019). Context-dependent “upper anchors” for learning progressions. Science & Education, 28(8), 957–981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00074-w
Smith, T. K. (2014). Elementary science instruction: Examining a virtual environment for evidence of learning, engagement, and 21st century competencies. Education Sciences, 4(1), 122–138. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci4010122
Stevens, S. Y., Sutherland, L. M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2009). The big ideas of nanoscale science and engineering. NSTA Press.
Stroupe, D. (2015). Describing “science practice” in learning settings. Science Education, 99(6), 1033–1040. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21191
Thorndyke, P. W., & Stasz, C. (1980). Individual differences in procedures for knowledge acquisition from maps. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 137–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90006-7
Tretter, T. R., Jones, M. G., Andre, T., Negishi, A., & Minogue, J. (2006a). Conceptual boundaries and distances: Students’ and experts’ concepts of the scale of scientific phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 282–319. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20123
Tretter, T. R., Jones, M. G., & Minogue, J. (2006b). Accuracy of scale conceptions in science: Mental maneuverings across many orders of spatial magnitude. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 1061–1085. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20155
Tsai, C. C. (2004). Beyond cognitive and metacognitive tools: The use of the internet as an ‘epistemological’ tool for instruction. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5), 525–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0007-1013.2004.00411.x
Tversky, B., & Schiano, D. J. (1989). Perceptual and conceptual factors in distortions in memory for graphs and maps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3418.104.22.1687
Waldrip, B., Prain, V., & Carolan, J. (2010). Using multi-modal representations to improve learning in junior secondary science. Research in Science Education, 40, 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9157-6
Wang, N., Stern, R. J., Urquhart, M. L., & Seals, K. M. (2022). Google earth geoscience video library (GEGVL): Organizing geoscience videos in a google earth environment to support fieldwork teaching methodology in earth science. Geosciences, 12(6), 250. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12060250
Wiegand, P. (2006). Learning and teaching with maps. Routledge.
Wilbanks, T. J., & Kates, R. W. (1999). Global change in local places: how scale matters. Climatic Change, 43(3), 601–628. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005418924748
Winch, C. (2013). Curriculum design and epistemic ascent. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 47(1), 128–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12006
Winn, W. (1991). Learning from maps and diagrams. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 211–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320077
Yoon, S. A., Goh, S. E., & Yang, Z. (2019). Toward a learning progression of complex systems understanding. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 16(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.29173/cmplct29340
Yore, L. D., & Hand, B. (2010). Epilogue: Plotting a research agenda for multiple representations, multiple modality, and multimodal representational competency. Research in Science Education, 40, 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9160-y
Zhang, J., Tian, Y., Yuan, G., & Tao, D. (2022). Epistemic agency for costructuring expansive knowledge-building practices. Science Education, 106(4), 890–923. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21717
Zimmerman, H. T., & Weible, J. L. (2018). Epistemic agency in an environmental sciences watershed investigation fostered by digital photography. International Journal of Science Education, 40(8), 894–918. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1455115