Abstract
A qualitative study was conducted to understand how middle and high school students with visual impairments (VI) engage in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM). The Readiness Academy, a Project-Based Learning (PBL) intervention, was designed to provide a week-long, immersive, outdoor, and inquiry-based science education program to students with VI. We analyzed 187 photographs, camp associate intern notes, and researcher memos first using emotion coding, followed by process coding to structure initial codes and categories into seven research activities. We used axial coding as a secondary cycle coding method to determine four consistent themes across all research activities: apprenticeship, collaboration, accessibility, and independence. We found that the inclusion of purposeful accessibility, such as assistive technology and multisensory experiences, supported how students with VI engaged in STEM education. The findings reflect how students dynamically fulfilled roles as apprentices, collaborative members, and independent researchers within the program’s context of PBL and outdoor science education.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author GT. The data are not publicly available due to privacy/ethical restrictions.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
References
Ajuwon, P. M., & Oyinlade, A. O. (2008). Educational placement of children who are blind or have low vision in residential and public schools: A national study of parents’ perspectives. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 102(6), 325–339.
Aldrich, F. K., & Sheppard, L. (2001). Tactile graphics in school education: Perspectives from pupils. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 19(2), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/026461960101900303
American Printing House for the Blind (2017). Annual Report, Fiscal Year 2017.
Basham, J. D., & Marino, M. T. (2013). Understanding STEM education and supporting students through universal design for learning. Teaching exceptional children, 45(4), 8–15.
Bednar, A.K., Cunningham, D., Duffy, T.M. and Perry, J.D. (1991), 'Theory into practice: how do we link?' in Anglin, G.J. (ed), Instructional Technology: Past, Present, and Future (pp. 88–101), Englewood CO, Libraries Unlimited, Inc.
Bell, E. C., & Silverman, A. M. (2019). Access to math and science content for youth who are blind or visually impaired. Journal of Blindness Innovation & Research, 9(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.5241/9-152
Billett, S. (2016). Apprenticeship as a mode of learning and model of education. Education+ Training, 58(6), 613–628. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-01-2016-0001
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational psychologist, 26(3–4), 369–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139
Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klingner, J., Pugach, M., & Richardson, V. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205
Buck Institute for Education. (2003). Project Based Learning Handbook (2nd ed.). CA Buck Institute for Education: Novato.
Butler, M., Holloway, L., Marriott, K., & Goncu, C. (2017). Understanding the graphical challenges faced by vision-impaired students in Australian universities. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1177001
Cameto, R., & Nagle, K. (2007). Orientation and Mobility Skills of Secondary School Students with Visual Impairments. Facts from NLTS2. NCSER 2008–3007. National Center for Special Education Research.
Capraro, R. M., & Slough, S. W. (2013). Why PBL? Why STEM? Why now? an introduction to STEM project-based learning. In Capraro R.M., Capraro M.M., & Morgan J.R. (Eds.), STEM project-based learning (pp.1–5). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-143-6_1
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
Dennen, V. P. (2004). Cognitive Apprenticeship in Educational Practice: Research on Scaffolding, Modeling, Mentoring, and Coaching as Instructional Strategies. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (p. 813–828). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
DeSimone, J. R., & Parmar, R. S. (2006). Middle school mathematics teachers’ beliefs about inclusion of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 21(2), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2006.00210.x
English, M. C., & Kitsantas, A. (2013). Supporting student self-regulated learning in problem-and project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(2), 6. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1339
Farrand, K., Wild, T., & Hilson, M. P. (2016). Self-efficacy of students with visual impairments before and after participation in an inquiry-based camp. Journal of Science Education for Students with Disabilities, 19(1), 5.
Fisher, S., & Hartmann, C. (2005). Math through the mind's eye. The Mathematics Teacher, 99(4), 246–250. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/27971938
Gagnon, J. C., & Maccin, P. (2007). Teacher-reported use of empirically validated and standards-based instructional approaches in secondary mathematics. Remedial and Special Education, 28(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325070280010501
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Griffin-Shirley, N., Koenig, A. K., Layton, C. A., & Davidson, R. C. (2004). A survey of teachers of students with visual impairments: Responsibilities, satisfactions, and needs. RE: view, 36(1), 7.
Gültekin, M. (2005). The effect of project based learning on learning outcomes in the 5th grade social studies course in primary education. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 5(2) 548–556. Retrieved from https://search-ebscohost-com.ezproxy2.library.arizona.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asn&AN=19141732&site=ehost-live
Jobling, A., & Moni, K. B. (2004). ‘I never imagined I’d have to teach these children’: Providing authentic learning experiences for secondary pre-service teachers in teaching students with special needs. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 32(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866042000206026
Kahn, S., & Lewis, A. R. (2014). Survey on teaching science to K-12 students with disabilities: Teacher preparedness and attitudes. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(8), 885–910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9406-z
Kizilaslan, A., Zorluoglu, S. L., & Sozbilir, M. (2020). Improve learning with hands-on classroom activities: Science instruction for students with visual impairments. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 1-22 doi:10.1080/08856257.2020.1732110
Kubiatko, M., & Vaculová, I. (2011). Project-based learning: characteristic and the experiences with application in the science subjects. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 3(1), 65–74.
Kurth, J., & Foley, J. A. (2014). Reframing teacher education: Preparing teachers for inclusive education. Inclusion, 2(4), 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-2.4.286
Larmer, J. (2014). Project based learning vs. problem based learning vs. XBL. Retrieved from https://www.edutopia.org/blog/pbl-vs-pbl-vs-xbl-john-larmer
Livingston K. (2012) Independent Learning. In: Seel N.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_895
Moon, N. W., Todd, R. L., Morton, D. L., & Ivey, E. (2012). Accommodating students with disabilities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Atlanta, GA: Center for Assistive Technology and Environmental Access, Georgia Institute of Technology, 8–21. Retrieved from https://advance.cc.lehigh.edu/sites/advance.cc.lehigh.edu/files/accommodating.pdf
Norman, K., Caseau, D., & Stefanich, G. P. (1998). Teaching students with disabilities in inclusive science classrooms: Survey results. Science Education, 82(2), 127–146. Retrieved from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199804)82:2<127::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-G
Novak, E., & Wisdom, S. (2018). Effects of 3D printing project-based learning on preservice elementary teachers’ science attitudes, science content knowledge, and anxiety about teaching science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(5), 412–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9733-5
Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (ED). (2018). 40th Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the "Individuals with Disabilities Education Act," 2018.
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Roberts, T., Jackson, C., Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., Bush, S. B., Maiorca, C., Cavalcanti, M., et al. (2018). Students’ perceptions of STEM learning after participating in a summer informal learning experience. International journal of STEM education, 5(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0133-4
Rule, A. C. (2011). Tactile Earth and space science materials for students with visual impairments: Contours, craters, asteroids, and features of Mars. Journal of Geoscience Education, 59(4), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.5408/1.3651404
Rule, A. C., Stefanich, G. P., Boody, R. M., & Peiffer, B. (2011). Impact of adaptive materials on teachers and their students with visual impairments in secondary science and mathematics classes. International Journal of Science Education, 33(6), 865–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.506619
Saldana, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Sheppard, L., & Aldrich, F. K. (2001). Tactile graphics in school education: Perspectives from teachers. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 19(3), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/026461960101900303
Spungin, S. J., & Ferrell, K. A. (2007). The role and function of the teacher of students with visual impairments: A Position Paper of the Division on Visual Impairments Council of Exceptional Children. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
Supalo, C. A. (2012). The next generation laboratory interface for students with blindness or low vision in the science laboratory. Journal of Science Education for Students with Disabilities, 16(1), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.14448/jsesd.02.0004
Supalo, C. A., Isaacson, M. D., & Lombardi, M. V. (2014). Making hands-on science learning accessible for students who are blind or have low vision. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(2), 195–199. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed3000765
Supalo, C. A., Mallouk, T. E., Amorosi, C., Lanouette, J., Wohlers, H. D., & McEnnis, K. (2009). Using adaptive tools and techniques to teach a class of students who are blind or low-vision. Journal of Chemical Education, 86(5), 587. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed086p587
Supalo, C. A., Wohlers, H. D., & Humphrey, J. R. (2011). Students with blindness explore chemistry at" camp can do". Journal of Science Education for Students with Disabilities, 15(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.14448/jsesd.04.0001
Tal, T., Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2006). Urban schools’ teachers enacting project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(7), 722–745. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20102
Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. (2015). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Teke, D., & Sozbilir, M. (2019). Teaching energy in living systems to a blind student in an inclusive classroom environment. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(4), 890–901. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9rp00002j
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). Digest of Education Statistics, 2018 (NCES 2020–009).
Wedler, H. B., Boyes, L., Davis, R. L., Flynn, D., Franz, A., Hamann, C. S., et al. (2014). Nobody can see atoms: Science camps highlighting approaches for making chemistry accessible to blind and visually impaired students. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(2), 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed300600p
Wild, T. A., Hilson, M. P., & Farrand, K. M. (2013). Conceptual understanding of geological concepts by students with visual impairments. Journal of Geoscience Education, 61(2), 222–230. https://doi.org/10.5408/12-379.1
Wild, T. A., Hilson, M., & Farrand, K. (2014). Preparing for an inquiry-based summer camp experience for students with visual impairments: What do the campers think? Journal of Blindness Innovation & Research, 4, 2. https://doi.org/10.5241/4-58
Wild, T. A., Hilson, M. P., & Hobson, S. M. (2013). The conceptual understanding of sound by students with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 107(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482x1310700204
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. This study has been completed through support of the National Science Foundation and a statement has been added to indicate that the result of the study is independent from the view of the National Science Foundation.
Ethics Approval
An Institutional Review Board at the University of Arizona reviewed and approved this research study in accordance to applicable state and federal regulations and University policies designed to protect the rights and welfare of participants in research.
Consent to Participate
Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of individual participants included in the research study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The Project-Based Learning Opportunities and Exploration of Mentorship for Students with Visual Impairments in STEM (POEM) Project is funded by the National Science Foundation's Innovative Technology Experiences for Students and Teachers (ITEST) program. Award DRL #1657201. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tsinajinie, G., Kirboyun, S. & Hong, S. An Outdoor Project-Based Learning Program: Strategic Support and the Roles of Students with Visual Impairments Interested in STEM. J Sci Educ Technol 30, 74–86 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09874-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09874-0
Keywords
- Project-based learning
- Middle and high school science
- Inclusive education
- Accessibility
- Visual impairment
- Blind