Children’s and Adolescents’ Specific Interest in Science and Technology, Participation in Out-of-School Activities and Inclination to Become Scientists

  • María José RocheraEmail author
  • Iris Merino
  • Judith Oller
  • César Coll


Recently, the literature has repeatedly reported an interesting decrease in science and technology (S&T) among youngsters, and a drop of students choosing professions related to these knowledge areas. This study pursued to assess the interest of primary and secondary pupils in specific fields of S&T and to relate this interest to their predisposition to engage in S&T-related out-of-school activities and their inclination to become scientists in the future. A questionnaire on S&T interests and attitudes was administered to a sample of 1336 pupils. Results show that, overall, the inclination to become scientists was low. However, we found a relationship between pupils’ interest in areas of S&T and their predisposition to participate in out-of-school S&T activities, and also between their interest and their inclination to become scientists. Moreover, significant age- and sex-related differences concerning all these aspects were identified. We discuss the importance of acknowledging children’s and adolescents’ specific interest to promote their participation in S&T-related school activities and out-of-school activities. We also urge that information about scientific and technological careers be disseminated in schools in order to increase students’ interest in these areas.


Out-of-school activities Specific interests Science and technology Scientific work 


Funding Information

This work was performed as part of two research projects funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (EDU2013-40965-R) and La Caixa Foundation (RecerCaixa program, call 2013). The Catalan government also support our reseach group through the call for Consolidated Reseach Groups (2014 SGR 178; 2014 SGR 1250). More information about these projects and the research group can be found at and

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest. Regarding the human participants, the families of the students and students were properly informed before the application of the questionnaire about the research aims and procedures and families signed a document to ensure their informed consent.


  1. Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2011). A cultural perspective on the structure of student interest in science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderhag, P., Wickman, P.-O., Bergqvist, K., Jakobson, B., Hamza, K. M., & Säljö, R. (2016). Why do secondary school students lose their interest in science? Or does it never emerge? A possible and overlooked explanation. Science Education, 100(5), 791–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010). “Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren’s constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azevedo, F. (2011). Lines of practice: A practice-centered theory of interest relationships. Cognition and Instruction, 29(2), 147–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Azevedo, F., Mann, M., Lee, V., Cain, R., & Bell, P. (2016). Moving ahead in the study of STEM interests and interest development: A new research agenda. In Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 1098–1105). Singapore: International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
  6. Baram-Tsabari, A., & Yarden, A. (2009). Identifying meta-clusters of students’ interest in science and their change with age. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(9), 999–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human Development, 49(4), 193–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barron, B. (2013). Creating within and across life spaces: The role of a computer clubhouse in a child’s learning ecology. In B. Bevan, P. Bell, R. Steven, & A. Razfar (Eds.), LOST Opportunities: Learning in Out-of-School Time (pp. 99–118). Dordrecht, NL: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barron, B., Walter, S. E., Martin, C. K., & Schatz, C. (2010). Predictors of creative computing participation and profiles of experience in two Silicon Valley middle schools. Computers and Education, 54(1), 178–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (Eds.). (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bell, P., Bricker, L. A., Reeve, S., Zimmerman, H. T., & Tzou, C. (2013). Discovering and supporting successful learning pathways of youth in and out of school: Accounting for the development of everyday expertise across settings. In B. Bevan, P. Bell, R. Steven, & A. Razfar (Eds.), LOST Opportunities: Learning in Out-of-School Time (pp. 199–140). Dordrecht, NL: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Bennett, J., & Hogarth, S. (2009). Would you want to talk to a scientist at a party? High school pupils’ attitudes to school science and to science. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 1975–1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bennett, J. Hampden-Thompson, G., & Lubben, F. (2011). Schools that make a difference to post-compulsory uptake of Science: Final project report to the Astra Zeneca Science Teaching Trust. University of York: Department of Education.Google Scholar
  14. Bennett, J., Braund, M., & Sharpe, R. (2013). Student attitudes, engagement and participation in STEM subjects report. York: University of York, Department of Education.Google Scholar
  15. Bergin, D. (2016). Social influences on interest. Educational Psychologist, 51(1), 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bevan, B., Bell, P., Steven, R., & Razfar, A. (2013). LOST Opportunities: Learning in Out-of-School Time. Dordrecht, NL: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bray, B., & McClaskey, K. (2015). Make learning personal. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin.Google Scholar
  18. Bricker, L., & Bell, P. (2014). What comes to mind when you think of science? The perfumery! Documenting science-related cultural learning pathways across contexts and timescales. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(3), 260–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. London: Routledge and Falmer.Google Scholar
  20. Coll, C. (2013). La educación formal en la nueva ecología del aprendizaje: tendencias, retos y agenda de investigación. En J. L. Rodríguez Illera (Comp.), Aprendizaje y Educación en la Sociedad Digital (pp. 156–170). Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
  21. Coll, C. (2016). La personalització de l’aprenentatge escolar. El què, el per què i el com d’un repte indefugible. A J. M. Vilalta (Dr.). Reptes de l’educació a Catalunya. Anuari d’Educació 2015. Barcelona: Fundació Bofill.Google Scholar
  22. Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Boston, MA: Riverside Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dierks, P. O., Höffler, T., & Parchmann, I. (2014). Profiling interest of students in science: Learning in school and beyond. Research in Science & Technological Education, 32(2), 97–114. Scholar
  24. European Commission. (2012). EU skills panorama analytical highlight science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) skill.Google Scholar
  25. Feldman, A., Divoll, K. A., & Rogan-Klyve, A. (2013). Becoming researchers: The participation of undergraduate and graduate students in scientific research groups. Science Education, 97(2), 218–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Finer, L. B., & Philbin, J. M. (2013). Sexual initiation, contraceptive use, and pregnancy among young adolescents. Pediatrics, 131, 886–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hasni, A., & Potvin, P. (2015). Student’s interest in science and technology and its relationships with teaching methods, family context and self-efficacy. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 10(3), 337–366. Scholar
  28. Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70, 151–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hidi, S., & Renninger, A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Houseal, A., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Destefano, L. (2014). Impact of a student–teacher–scientist partnership on students’ and teachers’ content knowledge, attitudes towards science, and pedagogical practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 84–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ito, M., Gutiérrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., & Watkins, S. C. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for rand design. Irvine, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.Google Scholar
  32. Jenkins, E. W., & Nelson, N. W. (2005). Important but not for me: Students’ attitudes towards secondary school science in England. Research in Science and Technological, 23(1), 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jenkins E. W., & Pell, R. G. (2006). The Relevance of Science Education Project (ROSE) in England: a summary of findings. Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, University of Leeds. University of Leeds, Leeds.Google Scholar
  34. Jidesjö, A. (2008). Different content orientations in science and technology among primary and secondary boys and girls in Sweden: Implications for the transition from primary to secondary school? Nordina, Nordic Studies in Science Education, 4(2), 192–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Khoo, S. T., & Ainley, J. (2005). Attitudes, intentions and participation. Camberwell: ACER.Google Scholar
  36. Krapp, A. (2000). Interest and human development during adolescence: An educational-psychological approach. In J. Heckhausen (Ed.), Advances in psychology, 131. Motivational psychology of human development: Developing motivation and motivating development (pp. 109–129). New York, NY: Elsevier Science. Scholar
  37. Krapp, A. (2007). An educational-psychological conceptualisation on interest. International Educational Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 7, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Krapp, A., Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (1992). Interest, learning, and development. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The Role of Interest in Learning and Development (pp. 3–25). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  40. Lavonen, J., Byman, R., Uitto, A., Juuti, K., & Meisalo, V. (2008). Students’ interest and experiences in physics and chemistry related themes: Reflections based on a ROSE-survey in Finland. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 1, 7–36.Google Scholar
  41. Leander, K. M., & Hollett, T. (2017). Embodied rhythms of learning: From learning across settings to learners crossing settings. International Journal of Educational Research, 84, 100–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Leander, K. M., Phillips, N. C., & Taylor, K. H. (2010). The changing social spaces of learning: mapping new mobilities. Review of Research on Education, 34, 329–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. Science Education, 95(5), 877–907. Scholar
  44. Miller, D. I., Eagly, A. H., & Linn, M. C. (2015). Women’s representation in Science Predicts National Gender-Science stereotypes: evidence from 66 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 631–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2006). Evolution of student interest in science and technology studies: Policy Report. Paris: OECD Global Science Forum.Google Scholar
  46. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2008). Encouraging student interest in science and technology studies. Paris: OCDE.Google Scholar
  47. Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. A report to the Nuffield Foundation. London: Nuffield Foundation.Google Scholar
  48. Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1049–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Penuel, W. R., & Johnson, R. (2016). Review of continued progress: Promising evidence on personalized learning. Boulder (USA): National Education Policy Center. School of Education, University of Colorado at Boulder.Google Scholar
  50. Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K-12 levels: a systematic review of 12 years of educational research. Studies in Science Education, 50, 85–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2011). Revisiting the conceptualization, measurement, and generation of interest. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 168–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2016). The power of interest for motivation and engagement. New York and London: Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
  53. Roth, W. M. (2002). Aprender ciencias en y para la comunidad. Enseñanza de las ciencias, 20(2), 195–208.Google Scholar
  54. Sadler, T. D., Burgin, S., McKinney, L., & Ponjuan, L. (2010). Learning science through research apprenticeships: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 235–256.Google Scholar
  55. Schraw, G., & Lehman, S. (2001). Situational interest: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 23–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schreiner, C., & Sjøberg, S. (2004). ROSE. The Relevance of Science Education. Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  57. Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis research. Review of Educational Research, 77, 454–499. Scholar
  58. Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2010). The Relevance of Science Education (ROSE) Project: An Overview and Key Findings. Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  59. Tytler, R., & Osborne, J. (2012). Student attitudes and aspirations towards science. In B. J. Fraser et al. (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 597–625). Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vázquez, Á., & Manassero, M. A. (2007). Las actividades extraescolares relacionadas con la ciencia y la tecnología. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 9(1), 1-34.Google Scholar
  61. Vedder-Weiss, D., & Fortus, D. (2011). Adolescents’ declining motivation to learn science: inevitable or not? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cognition, Development and Educational Psychology. Faculty of PsychologyUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations