Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Implementation of Game-transformed Inquiry-based Learning to Promote the Understanding of and Motivation to Learn Chemistry

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many studies have used the potential of computer games to promote students’ attitudes toward learning and increase their learning performance. A few studies have transformed scientific content into computer games or developed games with scientific content. In this paper, we employed students’ common misconceptions of chemistry regarding the properties of liquid to develop a computer game. Daily life situations and everyday phenomena related to the chemical understanding of the properties of liquid were also taken into account. Afterward, we applied a process-oriented, inquiry-based active learning approach to implement the game in a Thai high school chemistry course. We studied the implementation of a game-transformed inquiry-based learning class by comparing it to a conventional inquiry-based learning class. The results of this study include aspects of students’ conceptual understanding of chemistry and their motivation to learn chemistry. We found that students in both the game-transformed inquiry-based learning class and conventional inquiry-based learning class had a significantly increased conceptual understanding of chemistry. There was also a significant difference between the gains of both classes between the pre- and post-conceptual understanding scores. Moreover, the post-conceptual understanding scores of students in the two classes were significantly different. These findings support the notion that students can better comprehend chemistry concepts through a computer game, especially when integrated with the process-oriented, inquiry-based learning approach. The findings of this study also highlight the game-transformed inquiry-based learning approach’s support of students’ motivation to learn chemistry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acar, B., & Tarhan, L. (2006). Effect of cooperative learning strategies on students’ understanding of concepts in electrochemistry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(2), 349–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. (2002). Reforming science teaching: what research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antunes, M., Pacheco, M., & Giovanela, M. (2012). Design and implementation of an educational game for teaching chemistry in higher education. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(4), 517–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayyıldız, Y., & Tarhan, L. (2013). Case study applications in chemistry lesson: gases, liquids, and solids. Chememical Education Research Practice, 14(4), 408–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, C. (2005). Factors related to observed attitude change toward learning chemistry among university students. Chemical Education Research Practice, 6(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergquist, W., & Heikkinen, H. (1990). Student ideas regarding chemical equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education, 67(12), 1000–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouwma-Gearhart, J., Stewart, J., & Brown, K. (2009). Student misapplication of a gas-like model to explain particle movement in heated solids: implications for curriculum and instruction towards students’ creation and revision of accurate explanatory models. International Journal of Science Education, 31(9), 1157–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bressler, D. M., & Bodzin, A. M. (2016). Investigating flow experience and scientific practices during a mobile serious educational game. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(5), 795–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridle, C., & Yezierski, E. (2012). Evidence for the effectiveness of inquiry-based, particulate-level instruction on conceptions of the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(2), 192–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buck, L., Bretz, S., & Towns, M. (2008). Characterizing the level of inquiry in the undergraduate laboratory. Journal of College Science Teaching, 38(1), 52–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chee, S. Y., & Tan, K. (2012). Becoming chemists through game-based inquiry learning: the case of Legends of Alkhimia. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 10(2).

  • Chen, Z. H., Liao, C. C. Y., Chien, T. C., & Chan, T. W. (2011). Animal companions: fostering children’s effort-making by nurturing virtual pets. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(1), 166–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daubenfeld, T., & Zenker, D. (2015). A game-based approach to an entire physical chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(2), 269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Castell, S., Jenson, J., & Taylor, N. (2007). Digital games for education: when meanings play. Intermedialities, (9), 45–54.

  • Demircioglu, G., Ayas, A., & Demircioglu, H. (2005). Conceptual change achieved through a new teaching program on acids and bases. Chemical Education Research Practice, 6(1), 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorji, U., Panjaburee, P., & Srisawasdi, N. (2015). A learning cycle approach to developing educational computer game for improving students’ learning and awareness in electric energy consumption and conservation. Educational Technology & Society, 18(1), 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilam, B. (2004). Drops of water and of soap solution: students’ constraining mental models of the nature of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 970–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erhel, S., & Jamet, E. (2013). Digital game-based learning: Impact of instructions and feedback on motivation and learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 67, 156–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frailich, M., Kesner, M., & Hofstein, A. (2009). Enhancing students’ understanding of the concept of chemical bonding by using activities provided on an interactive website. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(3), 289–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannakos, M. (2013). Enjoy and learn with educational games: examining factors affecting learning performance. Computers & Education, 68, 429–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, S., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science motivation questionnaire II: validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1159–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, A. K., & Preston, K. R. (1992). Grade-12 students’ misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 611–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haussler, P., & Hoffmann, L. (2002). An intervention study to enhance girls’ interest, self-concept, and achievement in physics classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 870–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, R. (1993). Teaching as communication. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstein, A., Navon, O., Kipnis, M., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Developing students’ ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry-type chemistry laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 791–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, W. (2011). Evaluating learners’ motivational and cognitive processing in an online game-based learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 694–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, G. J., & Wu, P. H. (2012). Advancements and trends in digital game-based learning research: a review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), E6–E10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, G., Chiu, L., & Chen, C. (2015). A contextual game-based learning approach to improving students’ inquiry-based learning performance in social studies courses. Computers & Education, 81, 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavak, N. (2012). ChemOkey: a game to reinforce nomenclature. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(8), 1047–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klahr, D., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 12(1), 1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, R., Akmal, T., & Petrie, K. (2015). Development of a cognition-priming model describing learning in a STEM classroom. Journalof Research in Science Teaching, 52(3), 410–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. S., & Butler, N. (2003). Making authentic science accessible to students. International Journal of Science Education, 25(8), 923–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., & Chen, M. (2009). A computer game as a context for non-routine mathematical problem solving: the effects of type of question prompt and level of prior knowledge. Computers & Education, 52(3), 530–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leite, L., Mendoza, J., & Borsese, A. (2007). Teachers’ and prospective teachers’ explanations of liquid-state phenomena: a comparative study involving three European countries. Journalof Research in Science Teaching, 44(2), 349–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, D., & Lim, C. (2008). Scaffolding online historical inquiry tasks: a case study of two secondary school classrooms. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1394–1410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, B. (2004). Challenges and issues in designing inquiry on the web. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(2004), 627–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., Gerard, L., Ryoo, K., McElhaney, K., Liu, O. L., & Rafferty, A. N. (2014). Education technology. Computer-guided inquiry to improve science learning. Science (New York, N.Y.), 344(6180), 155–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcnamara, D. S., Jackson, G. T., & Graesser. (2010). Intelligent Tutoring and Games (ItaG). Gaming for classroom-based learning: digital role playing as a motivator of study, 44–57.

  • Moore, E. B., Timothy, A., Herzog, T. A., & Perkins, K. (2013). Interactive simulations as implicit support for guided inquiry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(3), 257–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moos, D., & Marroquin, E. (2010). Multimedia, hypermedia, and hypertext: motivation considered and reconsidered. Computers In Human Behavior, 26(3), 265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, F., Gibbs, M., & Vetere, F. (2010). Towards understanding how to design for social play in exertion games. Personal Ubiquitous Computing, 14(5), 417–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P., & Alexander, P. (2000). A motivated exploration of motivation terminology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 3–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakhleh, M., & Samarapungavan, A. (1999). Elementary school children’s beliefs about matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(7), 777–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: a guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noh, T., & Scharmann, L. (1997). Instructional influence of a molecular-level pictorial presentation of matter on students’ conceptions and problem-solving ability. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 199–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: the essential factor for conceptual change in limited or appropriate propositional hierarchies (LIPHs) leading to empowerment of learners. Science Education, 86(4), 548–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R. (2008). Engaging first year students using a web-supported inquiry-based learning setting. Higher Education, 55(3), 285–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils’ views of the role and value of the science curriculum: a focus-group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozmen, H. (2011). Effect of animation enhanced conceptual change texts on 6th grade students’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter and transformation during phase changes. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1114–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papastergiou, M. (2009). Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedaste, M., & Sarapuu, T. (2006). Developing an effective support system for inquiry learning in a Web-based environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(1), 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilli, O., & Aksu, M. (2013). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on the achievement, attitudes and retention of fourth grade mathematics students in North Cyprus. Computers & Education, 62, 62–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyatt, K., & Sims, R. (2012). Virtual and physical experimentation in inquiry-based science labs: attitudes, performance and access. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schauble, L. (1996). The development of scientific reasoning in knowledge-rich contexts. Developmental Psychology, 32(1), 102–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H. J. (1999). Should chemistry lessons be more intellectually challenging? Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 1(1), 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H. J., Baumgartner, T., & Eybe, H. (2003). Changing ideas about the periodic table of elements and students’ alternative concepts of isotopes and allotropes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(3), 257–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning difficulties in chemistry: an overview. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(2), 2–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skamp, K. (1999). Are atoms and molecules too difficult for primary children? School Science Review, 81(295), 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snir, J., Smith, C., & Raz, G. (2003). Linking phenomena with competing underlying models: a software tool for introducing students to the particulate model of matter. Science Education, 87(6), 794–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, Y., & Wen, Y. (2018). Integrating various apps on BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) into seamless inquiry-based learning to enhance primary students’ science learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(2), 165–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, B., & Meyer, B. (2007). Serious Games in language learning and teaching-a theoretical perspective, DiGRA Conference Proceedings, 559–566.

  • Srisawasdi, N. (2012). Student teachers’ perceptions of computerized laboratory practice for science teaching: a comparative analysis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4031–4038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srisawasdi, N. (2015). Evaluation of motivational impact of a computer-based nanotechnology inquiry learning module on the gender gap. Journal of Nano Education, 7(1), 28–37 (10).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srisawasdi, N., & Kroothkeaw, S. (2014). Supporting students’ conceptual learning and retention of light refraction concepts by simulation-based inquiry with dual-situated learning model. Journal of Computers in Education, 1(1), 49–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srisawasdi, N., & Sormkhatha, P. (2014). The effect of simulation-based inquiry on students’ conceptual learning and its potential applications in mobile learning. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 8(1), 24–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stieff, M. (2011). Improving representational competence using molecular simulations embedded in inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1137–1158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, R. (2009). Serious games: virtual reality’s second coming? Virtual Reality, 13(1), 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suits, J. P., & Srisawasdi, N. (2013). Use of an interactive computer-simulated experiment to enhance students’ mental models of hydrogen bonding phenomena. In J. P. Suits & M. J. Sanger (Eds.), Pedagogic roles of animations and simulations in chemistry courses ACS Symposium Series (p. 1142). Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sung, H., & Hwang, G. (2013). A collaborative game-based learning approach to improving students’ learning performance in science courses. Computers & Education, 63, 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K., & Garcia-Franco, A. (2010). Learning processes in chemistry: drawing upon cognitive resources to learn about the particulate structure of matter. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 99–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toro-Troconis, M. & Partrigde, M. (2010). Designing Game-based learning activities in virtual worlds: experiences from undergraduate medicine. Gaming for Classroom-Based Learning: use of gaming in virtual worlds, 270–289.

  • Ucar, S., & Trundle, K. C. (2011). Conducting guided inquiry in science classes using authentic, archived, web-based data. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1571–1582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, W., Mong, C., & Harris, C. (2011). A case study of the in-class use of a video game for teaching high school history. Computers & Education, 56(2), 466–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakmaci-Guzel, B. (2013). Preservice chemistry teachers in action: an evaluation of attempts for changing high school students’ chemistry misconceptions into more scientific conceptions. Chemical Education Research Practice, 14(1), 95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of Mahidol University and Khon Kaen University. The author would like to thank Mrs. Nattida Nantakaew, chemistry teacher, and current member of Frontiers of Educational Science and Technology (FEST) Research Network, Thailand, for her contribution of previous research works. The authors also thank teachers, principal, and students of the school.

Funding

This study was funded by Mahidol University, Thailand (grant no. 80/2561).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, Khon Kaen University, Muang, Khon Kaen, Thailand

    Niwat Srisawasdi

  2. Institute for Innovative Learning, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakorn Pathom, Thailand

    Patcharin Panjaburee

Authors
  1. Niwat Srisawasdi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Patcharin Panjaburee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patcharin Panjaburee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Mahidol University Central Institutional Review Board, Thailand with the COA No. MU-CIRB 2018/091.0105 declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Srisawasdi, N., Panjaburee, P. Implementation of Game-transformed Inquiry-based Learning to Promote the Understanding of and Motivation to Learn Chemistry. J Sci Educ Technol 28, 152–164 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9754-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9754-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation