Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Cloud Pedagogy: Utilizing Web-Based Technologies for the Promotion of Social Constructivist Learning in Science Teacher Preparation Courses

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The new guidelines for science education emphasize the need to introduce computers and digital technologies as a means of enabling visualization and data collection and analysis. This requires science teachers to bring advanced technologies into the classroom and use them wisely. Hence, the goal of this study was twofold: to examine the application of web-based technologies in science teacher preparation courses and to examine pre-service teachers’ perceptions of “cloud pedagogy”—an instructional framework that applies technologies for the promotion of social constructivist learning. The study included university teachers (N = 48) and pre-service science teachers (N = 73). Data were collected from an online survey, written reflections, and interviews. The findings indicated that university teachers use technologies mainly for information management and the distribution of learning materials and less for applying social constructivist pedagogy. University teachers expect their students (i.e., pre-service science teachers) to use digital tools in their future classroom to a greater extent than they themselves do. The findings also indicated that the “cloud pedagogy” was perceived as an appropriate instructional framework for contemporary science education. The application of the cloud pedagogy fosters four attributes: the ability to adapt to frequent changes and uncertain situations, the ability to collaborate and communicate in decentralized environments, the ability to generate data and manage it, and the ability to explore new venous.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Akcay H, Yager R (2010) Accomplishing the visions for teacher education programs advocated in the national science education standards. J Sci Teach Educ 21:643–664. doi:10.1007/s10972-010-9213-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak M (2007) Transitions from traditional to ICT-enhanced learning environments in undergraduate chemistry courses. Comp & Educ 48(1):30–43. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.11.004

  • Barak M (2014) Closing the gap between attitudes and perceptions about ICT-enhanced learning among pre-service STEM teachers. J Sci Educ Technol 23(1):1–14. doi:10.1007/s10956-013-9446-8

  • Barak M (2017) Science teacher education in the twenty-first century: a pedagogical framework for technology-integrated social constructivism. Res Sci Educ 47(2). doi:10.1007/s11165-015-9501-y

  • Barak M, Dori Y J (2009) Enhancing higher order thinking skills among in-service science education teachers via embedded assessment. J Sci Teach Educ 20(5):459–474. doi:10.1007/s10972-009-9141-z

  • Barak M, Ziv S (2013) Wandering: a Web-based platform for the creation of location-based interactive learning objects. Comp & Educ 62:159–170. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.015

  • Barak M, Lipson A, Lerman S (2006) Wireless laptops as means for promoting active learning in large lecture halls. J Res Technol Educ 38(3):245–264. doi:10.1080/15391523.2006.10782459

  • Aydeniz M, Southerland SA (2012) A national survey of middle and high school science teachers’ responses to standardized testing: is science being devalued in schools? J Sci Teach Educ 23(3):233–257. doi:10.1007/s10972-012-9266-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell RL, Maeng JL, Binns IC (2013) Learning in context: technology integration in a teacher preparation program informed by situated learning theory. J Res Sci Teach 50(3):348–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Zvi Assaraf O (2011) Learning from failure: a case study of where an extracurricular science program went wrong. J Sci Educ Technol 20:592–607. doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9327-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berenfeld B, Yazijian H (2010) Global lab: harnessing the cloud and social networking for K-12 science learning since 1991. In: Gibson D, Dodge B (eds) In: Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference. AACE, Chesapeake, pp 3544–3547

    Google Scholar 

  • Black P, Wiliam D (1998) Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education 5(1):7–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee RW (2014) NGSS and the next generation of science teachers. J Sci Teach Educ 25(2):211–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao L (ed) (2012) Cloud Computing for teaching and learning: strategies for design and implementation. IGI Global, Hershey

    Google Scholar 

  • Coenders F, Terlouw C (2015) A model for in-service teacher learning in the context of an innovation. J Sci Teach Educ 26:451–470. doi:10.1007/s10972-015-9432-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cofré H, González-Weil C, Vergara C et al (2015) Science teacher education in South America: the case of Argentina, Colombia and Chile. J Sci Teach Educ 26(1):45–63. doi:10.1007/s10972-015-9420-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL (2007) Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) (2005) The sage handbook of qualitative research, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan DA, Borda EJ, Hanley DM, Landel CC (2015) Participation in a multi-institutional curriculum development project changed science faculty knowledge and beliefs about teaching science. J Sci Teach Educ 26(2):193–216. doi:10.1007/s10972-014-9414-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field AP (2013) Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS: and sex and drugs and rock ‘n’ roll, 4th edn. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Foote, K. T. (2016). Curriculum development in studio-style university physics and implications for dissemination of research-based reforms. Physical Review Physics Education Research,12(1), doi:10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.

  • Gerard L, Linn MC (2016) Using automated scores of student essays to support teacher guidance in classroom inquiry. J Sci Teach Educ. doi:10.1007/s10972-016-9455-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin P, McGaw B, Care E (eds) (2012) Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CC (2006) Effective professional development and change in practice: barriers science teachers encounter and implications for reform. Sch Sci Math 106:150–161. doi:10.1111/j1949-85942006tb18172x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafyulilo AC, Fisser P, Voogt J (2015) Supporting teachers learning through the collaborative design of technology-enhanced science lessons. J Sci Teach Educ 26(8):673–694. doi:10.1007/s10972-015-9444-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2008) Introducing TPCK. AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), The handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 3–29). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

  • Krajcik J, Codere S, Dahsah C, Bayer R, Mun K (2015) Planning instruction to meet the intent of the next generation science standards. J Sci Teach Educ 25:157–175. doi:10.1007/s10972-014-9383-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G.D., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J.A., Bridges, B.K. and Hayek, J.C. (2007). Piecing together the student success puzzle: research, propositions, and recommendations. ASHE Higher Education Report, vol 32, No 5. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. University of Cambridge press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lawshe CH (1975) A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol 28(4):563–575. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman NG, Lederman JS (2015) The status of preservice science teacher education: a global perspective. J Sci Teach Educ 26(1):1–6. doi:10.1007/s10972-015-9422-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke JL (2001) Articulating communities: sociocultural perspectives on science education. J Res Sci Teach 38:296–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazur E (2009) Farewell, lecture? Science 323:50–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mell P, Grance T (2011) The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) definition of Cloud Computing. NIST Pub, Gaithersburg Retrieved from http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-145/SP800-145.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra P, Kereluik K (2011) What 21st century learning? A review and a synthesis. In: Koehler M, Mishra P (eds) Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2011. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, pp 3301–3312

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra P, Koehler M (2006) Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teach Coll Rec 108(6):1017–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council [NRC] (2015) Guide to implementing the Next Generation Science Standards. National Academies Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council [NRC] (2012a) Education for life and work: developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. The National Academies Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council [NRC] (2012b) A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a conceptual framework for new k-12 science education standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) Lead States (2013) Next Generation Science Standards: for states, by states. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD] (2013a) Trends shaping education 2013. Paris: OECD Pub. doi:10.1787/trends_edu-2013-en. Retrieved September 9, 2015

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD] (2013b) Draft PISA 2015 Science Framework. Paris: OECD Pub. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisa2015draftframeworks.htm. Retrieved September 9, 2015

  • Osborne J (2011) Science teaching methods: a rationale for practices. Sch Sci Rev 93:93–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne J (2014) Teaching scientific practices: meeting the challenge of change. J Sci Teach Educ 25:77–196. doi:10.1007/s10972-014-9384-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar AS (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annu Rev Psychol 49:345–375

  • Rodriguez AJ (2015) What about a dimension of engagement, equity, and diversity practices? A critique of the Next Generation Science Standards. J Res Sci Teach 52(7):1031–1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff B (1998) Cognition as a collaborative process. In: Kuhn D, Siegler RS (eds) Handbook of Child Psychology, vol, 2, 5th edn. Wiley, New York, pp 679–744

    Google Scholar 

  • Segers M, Dochy F, Cascallar E (eds) (2003) Optimising new modes of assessment: in search of qualities and standards. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman LS (1987) Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harv Educ Rev 57(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siry CA, Lang DE (2010) Creating participatory discourse for teaching and research. J Sci Teach Educ 21(2):149–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tasker TQ, Herrenkohl LR (2016) Using peer feedback to improve students’ scientific inquiry. J Sci Teach Educ 27(1):35–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Faculty of Education in Science and Technology, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, 320003, Haifa, Israel

    Miri Barak

Authors
  1. Miri Barak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miri Barak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barak, M. Cloud Pedagogy: Utilizing Web-Based Technologies for the Promotion of Social Constructivist Learning in Science Teacher Preparation Courses. J Sci Educ Technol 26, 459–469 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9691-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9691-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation