Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 25, Issue 6, pp 961–975 | Cite as

STEM Pathways: Examining Persistence in Rigorous Math and Science Course Taking

  • Shetay N. Ashford
  • Rheta E. Lanehart
  • Gladis K. Kersaint
  • Reginald S. Lee
  • Jeffrey D. Kromrey
Article

Abstract

From 2006 to 2012, Florida Statute §1003.4156 required middle school students to complete electronic personal education planners (ePEPs) before promotion to ninth grade. The ePEP helped them identify programs of study and required high school coursework to accomplish their postsecondary education and career goals. During the same period Florida required completion of the ePEP, Florida’s Career and Professional Education Act stimulated a rapid increase in the number of statewide high school career academies. Students with interests in STEM careers created STEM-focused ePEPs and may have enrolled in STEM career academies, which offered a unique opportunity to improve their preparedness for the STEM workforce through the integration of rigorous academic and career and technical education courses. This study examined persistence of STEM-interested (i.e., those with expressed interest in STEM careers) and STEM-capable (i.e., those who completed at least Algebra 1 in eighth grade) students (n = 11,248), including those enrolled in STEM career academies, in rigorous mathematics and science course taking in Florida public high schools in comparison with the national cohort of STEM-interested students to measure the influence of K-12 STEM education efforts in Florida. With the exception of multi-race students, we found that Florida’s STEM-capable students had lower persistence in rigorous mathematics and science course taking than students in the national cohort from ninth to eleventh grade. We also found that participation in STEM career academies did not support persistence in rigorous mathematics and science courses, a prerequisite for success in postsecondary STEM education and careers.

Keywords

Career academies Electronic personal education planner Persistence Rigorous math and science course taking STEM-capable 

Supplementary material

10956_2016_9654_MOESM1_ESM.docx (164 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 164 kb)

References

  1. Adelman C (1999) Answers in the tool box. Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor’s degree attainment. National Institute on Postsecondary Education, Libraries, and Lifelong Learning. Washington. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED431363.pdf
  2. Allison PD (1995) Survival analysis using SAS: a practical guide. SAS Institute, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  3. Association for Career and Technical Education (2009) ACTE Issue brief: CTE’s role in science, technology, engineering & math. Association for Career and Technical Education, Alexandria. Retrieved from https://www.acteonline.org/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=2104
  4. Austin PC (2011) An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effect of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res 46:399–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burkam DT, Lee VE (2003) Mathematics, foreign language, and science course-taking and the NELS:88 transcript data (NCES No. 2003-01). U.S. Department of Education, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  6. Carnevale AP, Smith N, Melton M (2011) STEM: science technology engineering mathematics. Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce, Washington. Retrieved from https://cew.georgetown.edu/report/stem/
  7. Castellano M, Stone JR III, Stringfield S, Farley EN, Wayman JC (2004) The effect of CTE-enhanced whole-school reform on student course-taking and performance in english and science. National Research Center for Career and Technical Education, University of Minnesota, St. Paul. Retrieved from http://www.nrccte.org/resources/publications/effect-cte-enhanced-whole-school-reform-student-course-taking-and-performance
  8. Chen J, Kaplan D (2015) Covariate balance in Bayesian propensity score approaches for observational studies. J Res Educ Eff 8(2):280–302Google Scholar
  9. Chen H, Cohen P, Chen S (2010) How big is a big odds ratio? Interpreting the magnitudes of odds ratios in epidemiological studies. Commun Stat Simul Comput 39:860–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Choy S (2001) Students whose parents did not go to college: Postsecondary access, persistence, and attainment (NCES No. 2001-126). National Center for Education Statistics, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  11. Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century (U.S.), Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (U.S.) (2007) Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. National Academies Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  12. Committee on Underrepresented Groups and the Expansion of the Science and Engineering Workforce (U.S.), Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (U.S.), National Research Council (U.S.), Policy and Global Affairs (2010) Expanding underrepresented minority participation: America’s science and technology talent at the crossroads. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  13. DuGoff EH, Schulser M, Stuart EA (2014) Generalizing observational study results: applying propensity score methods to complex surveys. Health Serv Res 49:284–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. FACTS.org (2010) Annual report 2009–2010. Florida Department of Education, Tallahassee. Retrieved from http://facts.org
  15. FACTS.org (2012) Electronic personal education planner (ePEP). Florida Department of Education, Tallahassee. Retrieved from http://facts.org
  16. Federman M (2007) State graduation requirements, high school course-taking, and choosing a technical college major. B E J Econ Anal Policy 7:4Google Scholar
  17. Finkelstein N, Fong A, Tiffany-Morales J, Shields P, Huang M (2012) College bound in middle school & high school? How mathematics course sequences matter. Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning at WestEd, San Franciso. Retrieved from http://www.wested.org/resources/college-bound-in-middle-school-and-high-school-how-math-course-sequences-matter/
  18. Fletcher E, Cox E (2012) Exploring the meaning African American students ascribe to their participation in high school career academies and the challenges they experience. High School J 96(1):4–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fletcher EC, Zirkle C (2009) The relationship of high school curriculum tracks to degree attainment and occupational earnings. Career Tech Educ Res 34(2):81–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Florida Department of Education (2014) Florida career and professional education act (CAPE). Division of Career and Adult Education. Retrieved from http://www.fldoe.org/core/fileparse.php/7574/urlt/0101168-cape-act-techassist.pdf
  21. Florida Department of Education (FLDOE) (2016) PK-20 education data warehouse. Retrieved from http://www.fldoe.org/accountability/data-sys/edw/
  22. Florida Statute § 1003.4156 (2006). Retrieved from http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/
  23. Florida Virtual Campus (2012) Transition news for counselors and educators. Retrieved from http://www.fsw.edu/wp/echslee/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2012/09/FACTS.pdf
  24. Gordon HR (2014) The history and growth of career and technical education in America, 4th edn. Waveland Press, Long Grove, ILGoogle Scholar
  25. Gottfried MA, Bozick R, Srinivasan SV (2014) Beyond academic math: the role of applied STEM course-taking in high school. Teach Coll Rec 116:070308Google Scholar
  26. Hilton TL, Lee VE (1988) Student interest and persistence in science: changes in the educational pipeline in the last decade. J Higher Educ 59(5):510–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hong G (2004) Causal inference for multi-level observational data with application to kindergarten retention. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
  28. Ingels SJ, Dalton B, Holder TE, Lauff E, Burns LJ (2009) The high school longitudinal study of 2009 (HSLS: 09): a first look at fall 2009 ninth-graders (NCES No. 2011-327). US Department of Education, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  29. Institute SAS (2010) SAS/STAT® users guide 9.3. SAS Institute Inc, CaryGoogle Scholar
  30. Kemple JJ, Willner CJ (2008) Career academies: long-term impacts on labor market outcomes, educational attainment, and transitional adulthood. Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Kersaint GK, Kromrey JD (2012) Effects of STEM aspirants’ high school experiences on STEM and ICT course-taking (Grant No. 1139510). National Science FoundationGoogle Scholar
  32. Lanehart R, Rodriguez de Gil P, Kim ES, Bellara AP, Kromrey JD, Lee R (2012) Propensity score analysis and assessment of propensity score approaches using SAS procedures (Paper No. 314-2012). In: Proceedings from SAS global forum, Orlando, FLGoogle Scholar
  33. Lanehart RE, Rodriguez de Gil P, Dixon MP, Kromrey JD, Kersaint G (2014) The impact of career academies on STEM course-taking: moving to the next level (Paper No. 310776). In: Proceedings from the 2014 joint statistical meetings, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  34. Lichtenberger E, George-Jackson C (2013) Predicting high school students’ interest in majoring in a STEM field: insight into high school students’ postsecondary plans. J Career Tech Educ 28(1):19Google Scholar
  35. Locke E (2009) Proposed model for a streamlined, cohesive, and optimized K-12 STEM curriculum with a focus on engineering. J Technol Stud 35(2):23–35. Retrieved from https://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JOTS/v35/v35n2/pdf/locke.pdf
  36. Maltese AV, Tai RH (2011) Pipeline persistence: examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among US students. Sci Educ 95(5):877–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maple SA, Stage FK (1991) Influences on the choice of math/science major by gender and ethnicity. Am Educ Res J 28(1):37–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McCharen B, High K (2010) Career and technical programs of study and early indicators of retention in the College of Engineering. Association of Career and Technical Education Research, Ames. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.459.2123&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  39. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine (2007) Rising above the gathering storm: energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. National Academies Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  40. National Association for State Directors of Career and Technical Education Consortium (2014) Career clusters. Retrieved from https://careertech.org/career-clusters
  41. National Center for Education Statistics (2016) National assessment of educational progress (NAEP). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/about/
  42. National Economic Council (2011) A strategy for American innovation: Driving towards sustainable growth and quality jobs. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/nec/StrategyforAmericanInnovation
  43. National Mathematics Advisory Panel (2008) Foundations for success: the final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. US Department of EducationGoogle Scholar
  44. National Research Council (2011) Successful k-12 STEM education: identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Committee on highly successful science programs for K-12 science education. Board on Science Education and Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. The National Academies Press, Washington. Retrieved from http://www.stemreports.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/NRC_STEM_2.pdf
  45. National Science Board (2015) Revisiting the STEM workforce, a companion to science and engineering indicators 2014. National Science Foundation (NSB-2015-10), ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  46. Riegle-Crumb C, Moore C, Ramos-Wada A (2011) Who wants to have a career in science or math? Exploring adolescents’ future aspirations by gender and race/ethnicity. Sci Educ 95(3):458–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rodriguez de Gil P, Kromrey JD, Lanehart RE, Kim E-S, Montgomery J, Wang Y, Lee R, Cao C, Ashford S (2015a) An empirical comparison of multiple imputation approaches for treating missing data in observational studies. In: Proceedings of the SAS® Global Forum 2015 conference, paper 3316-2015. SAS Global Forum 2015, DallasGoogle Scholar
  48. Rodriguez de Gil P, Bellara AP, Lanehart RE, Lee RS, Kim E-S, Kromrey JS (2015b) How do propensity score methods measure up in the presence of measurement error? A Monte Carlo study. Multivar Behav Res 50:520–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sadler PM, Sonnert G, Hazari Z, Tai R (2012) Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: a gender study. Sci Educ 96(3):411–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sadler PP, Sonnert G, Hazari Z, Tai R (2014) The role of advanced high school coursework in increasing STEM career interest. Sci Educ 23(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schneider B, Swanson CB, Riegle-Crumb C (1998) Opportunities for learning: course sequences and positional advantages. Soc Psychol Educ 2:25–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schwab K, Sala-i-Martín X (2015) The global competitiveness report 2015–2016. World Economic Forum, Geneva. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/gcr/2015-2016/Global_Competitiveness_Report_2015-2016.pdf
  54. Seymour E, Hewitt NM, Friend CM (1997) Talking about leaving: why undergraduates leave the sciences, vol 12. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  55. Shadish WR, Steiner PM (2010) A primer on propensity score analysis. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev 10:10–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Singer JD, Willett JB (1993) It’s about time: using discrete-time survival analysis to study duration and the timing of events. J Educ Stat 18:155–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stern D, Raby M, Dayton C (1992) Career academies: partnerships for reconstructing American high schools. Jossey-Bass Education Series, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  58. Stone JR (2011) Delivering STEM education through career and technical education schools and programs [White paper]. Retrieved from http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_072641.pdf
  59. Stuart EA (2010) Matching methods for causal inference: a review and a look forward. Stat Sci 25:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tai RH, Qi Liu C, Maltese AV, Fan X (2006) Planning early for careers in science. Science 312(5777):1143–1144. doi:10.1126/science.1128690 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Teitelbaum P (2003) The influence of high school graduation requirement policies in mathematics and science on student course-taking patterns and achievement. Educ Eval Policy Anal 25(1):31–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Trusty J (2002) Effects of High school course-taking and other variables on choice of science and mathematics college majors. J Couns Dev 80:464–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Trusty J, Niles S, Carney JV (2005) Education-career planning and middle school counselors. Prof Sch Couns 9(2):136–143Google Scholar
  64. Tyson W, Lee R, Borman KM, Hanson MA (2007) Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) pathways: high school science and mathematics coursework and postsecondary degree attainment. J Educ Stud Placed Risk 12:243–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics (1992) National educational longitudinal study, 1988: second follow-up (student data) [Computer file]. National Opinion Research Center [Producer], Chicago. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [Distributor], Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  66. Ware NC, Lee VE (1988) Sex differences in choice of college science majors. Am Educ Res J 25(4):593–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shetay N. Ashford
    • 1
  • Rheta E. Lanehart
    • 2
  • Gladis K. Kersaint
    • 3
  • Reginald S. Lee
    • 2
  • Jeffrey D. Kromrey
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Occupational, Workforce, and Leadership StudiesTexas State UniversitySan MarcosUSA
  2. 2.Center for Research, Evaluation, Assessment, and MeasurementUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  3. 3.Neag School of EducationUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA

Personalised recommendations