Skip to main content

Psychology of Working Narratives of STEM Career Exploration for Non-dominant Youth

An Erratum to this article was published on 08 November 2016

Abstract

Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) is a domain of knowledge, skills, and practices that is pervasive and of critical importance in our highly technological, rapidly advancing, and increasingly connected world; however, non-dominant youth, namely from non-White, lower-income, non-English-speaking, and immigrant backgrounds, are disproportionately underrepresented in STEM careers in the USA. Professional STEM career participation can be especially valuable for non-dominant populations as these careers are high quality, in-demand, and can afford one social mobility and economic stability. It is, therefore, important that we understand the ways in which non-dominant youth explore STEM careers such that we can further support and expand these. As such, this exploratory study has applied a career development perspective known as a Psychology of Working (PoW; Blustein in The psychology of working: a new perspective for career development, counseling, and public policy, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, 2006) which is aptly suited to interpreting the career narratives of diverse, non-dominant populations in order to understand the unique STEM career exploration experiences of a group of non-dominant youth. The PoW framework has been modified in response to the developmental context of the youth, specifically, a focus on career expectations as opposed to career experiences, as well as their formal and informal educational experiences, including a National Science Foundation grant-funded STEM program, in which all of the participants were involved. From this study, an understanding has been gained of a number of different universal human needs that, when addressed, were influential on these youth’s STEM career exploration. In particular, social connectedness via STEM career mentorship was identified as most impactful for these youth.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Ahmad FZ, Boser U (2014) America’s leaky pipeline for teachers of color: getting more teachers of color into the classroom. Center for American Progress, Washington, DC. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/race/report/2014/05/04/88960/americas-leaky-pipeline-for-teachers-of-color

  2. Barton AC (2001) Science education in urban settings: seeking new ways of praxis through critical ethnography. J Res Sci Teach 38(8):899–917. doi:10.1002/tea.1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blustein DL (2006) The psychology of working: a new perspective for career development, counseling, and public policy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buck GA, Leslie-Pelecky D, Kirby SK (2002) Bringing female scientists into the elementary classroom: confronting the strength of elementary student’s stereotypical images of scientists. J Elem Sci Educ 14(2):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Buck GA, Plano Clark VL, Leslie-Pelecky D, Lu Y, Cerda-Lizarraga P (2008) Examining the cognitive processes used by adolescent girls and women scientists in identifying science role models: a feminist approach. Sci Educ 92(4):688–707. doi:10.1002/sce.20257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Burke RJ (2007) Women and minorities in STEM: a primer. In: Burke RJ, Mattis MC (eds) Women and minorities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: upping the numbers. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 3–27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Duffy RD, Dik BJ (2009) Beyond the self: external influences in the career development process. Career Dev Q 58(1):29–43. doi:10.1002/j.2161-0045.2009.tb00171.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Emdin C (2010) Urban science education for the hip-hop generation: Essential tools for the urban science educator and researcher. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gandara P, Bial D (2001) Paving the way to postsecondary education: K-12 intervention programs for underrepresented youth (NCES no 2001205). National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from ERIC Document Reproduction number ED 458 340, Washington

  10. Giordano PC (2003) Relationships in adolescence. Annu Rev Sociol 29:257–281. doi:10.2307/30036968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guerrero L, Singh S (2013) The psychology of working: a case study of Mexican American women with low educational attainment. Career Dev Q 61(1):27–39. doi:10.1002/j.2161-0045.2013.00033.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hall DT (2004) The protean career: a quarter-century journey. J Vocat Behav 65(1):1–13. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2003.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hees CK, Rottinghaus PJ, Briddick WC, Conrath JA (2012) Work-to-school transitions in the age of the displaced worker: a psychology of working perspective. Career Dev Q 60(4):333–342. doi:10.1002/j.2161-0045.2012.00025.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Holland J (1973) Making vocational choices. A theory of careers. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ingersoll R (2002) Out-of-field teaching, educational inequality, and the organization of schools: an exploratory analysis. CPRE Research Reports. http://repository.upenn.edu/cpre_researchreports/22

  16. Innovative Technology Experiences for Students and Teachers (ITEST). National Science Foundation

  17. Lent R, Brown S, Hackett G (2000) Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: a social cognitive analysis. J Couns Psychol 47(1):36–49. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.47.1.36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lent R, Brown SD, Sheu H-B, Schmidt J, Brenner BR, Gloster CS, Treistman D (2005) Social cognitive predictors of academic interests and goals in engineering: utility for women and students at historically black universities. J Couns Psychol 52(1):84–92. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.1.84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lewis B, Collins A (2001) Interpretive investigation of the science-related career decisions of three African-American college students. J Res Sci Teach 38(5):599–621. doi:10.1002/tea.1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Marfleet P, Blustein DL (2011) ‘Needed not wanted’: an interdisciplinary examination of the work-related challenges faced by irregular migrants. J Vocat Behav 78(3):381–389. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2011.03.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. National Research Council (2009) Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. The National Academies Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  22. National Science Board (2016) Science and engineering indicators 2016. National Science Foundation (NSB-2016-1), Arlington

  23. Oakes J, Ormseth T, Bell RM, Camp P (1990) Multiplying inequalities: the effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica

    Google Scholar 

  24. Packard BW-L, Babineau ME (2009) From drafter to engineer, doctor to nurse: an examination of career compromise as renegotiated by working-class adults over time. J Career Dev 35:207–227. doi:10.1177/0894845308327270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) (2010) Prepare and inspire: K-12 education in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) for America’s future, Washington

  26. Ryan RM, Deci E (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol 55(1):68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ryken A (2006) “Goin’ somewhere”: how career technical education programs support and constrain urban youth’s career decision-making. Career Tech Educ Res 31(1):49–71. doi:10.5328/CTER31.1.49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Savickas ML (2012) Life design: a paradigm for career intervention in the 21st century. J Couns Dev 90(1):13–19. doi:10.1111/j.1556-6676.2012.00002.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Solberg VS, Howard KA, Blustein DL, Close W (2002) Career development in the schools: connecting school-to-work-to-life. Couns Psychol 30(5):705–725. doi:10.1177/0011000002305003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Stake RE (2013) Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stine DD, Matthews CM (2009) The US science and technology workforce. Congressional Research Service Report for Congress. Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress, RL34539

  32. Strong EK Jr (1927) Vocational interest blank. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sullivan SE (1999) The changing nature of careers: a review and research agenda. J Manag 25:457–484. doi:10.1177/014920639902500308

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sullivan SE, Mainiero L (2008) Using the kaleidoscope career model to understand the changing patterns of women’s careers: designing HRD programs that attract and retain women. Adv Dev Hum Res 10(1):32–49. doi:10.1177/1523422307310110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Super D (1980) A life-span, life-space approach to career development. J Vocat Behav 16(3):282–298. doi:10.1016/0001-8791(80)90056-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tams S, Arthur MB (2010) New directions for boundaryless careers: agency and interdependence in a changing world. J Organ Behav 31(5):629–646. doi:10.1002/job.712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tan E, Barton AC, Kang H, O’Neill T (2013) Desiring a career in STEM-related fields: how middle school girls articulate and negotiate identities-in-practice in science. J Res Sci Teach 50(10):1143–1179. doi:10.1002/tea.21123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tate W (2001) Science education as a civil right: urban schools and opportunity-to-learn considerations. J Res Sci Teach 38(9):1015–1028. doi:10.1002/tea.1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Valla JM, Williams WM (2012) Increasing achievement and higher-education representation of under-represented groups in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields: a review of current K-12 intervention programs. J Women Minor Sci Eng 18(1):21–53. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2012002908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang X (2013) Why students choose STEM majors: motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. Am Educ Res J 50(5):1081–1121. doi:10.3102/0002831213488622

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported in part through the National Science Foundation’s Information Technology Experiences for Students and Teachers (ITEST) program (Grants #0525040 and #0833624), a Hewlett Packard Foundation Teaching with Technology Program (Grant #189660), the Peter J. Sharp Foundation, and the Lynch School of Education at Boston College.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sheron L. Mark.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9670-0.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

See Table 4.

Table 4 Local organizations targeted for STEM career mentors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mark, S.L. Psychology of Working Narratives of STEM Career Exploration for Non-dominant Youth. J Sci Educ Technol 25, 976–993 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9646-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • STEM career exploration
  • Psychology of working
  • STEM career mentorship
  • STEM engagement
  • Non-dominant youth