Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 25, Issue 6, pp 1025–1041 | Cite as

Opting in and Creating Demand: Why Young People Choose to Teach Mathematics to Each Other

  • Eli Tucker-Raymond
  • Naama Lewis
  • Maisha Moses
  • Chad Milner


Access to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields serves as a key entry point to economic mobility and civic enfranchisement. Such access must take seriously the intellectual power of the knowledge and practices of non-dominant youth. In our case, this has meant to shift epistemic authority in mathematics from academic institutions to young people themselves. This article is about why high school-aged students, from underrepresented groups, choose to participate in an out-of-school time program in which they teach younger children in the domains of mathematics and computer science. It argues for programmatic principles based on access, identity engagement, relationship building, and connections to community to support underrepresented youth as learners, teachers, leaders, and organizers in mathematics-related activities using game design as the focus of activity.


Game design Mathematics Adolescents Near-peer Motivation Social change 


  1. Adams J, Webster A (2012) What do students learn about programming from game, music and storytelling projects? Proceedings of the 43rd ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education. Association for Computing Machinery, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Adelman C (1999) Answers in the toolbox: academic intensity, attendance patterns and bachelor’s degree attainment. U.S. Department of Education, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. Adler RL, Goodwyn LW, Weiss B (1977) Equivalence of topological Markov shifts. Isr J Math 27:49–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alvermann DE (2001) Adolescent literacies. National Reading Conference White Paper. NRCGoogle Scholar
  5. Aydin E (2005) The use of computers in mathematics education: a paradigm shift in “computer assisted instruction” towards “student programming”. Turk Online J Educ 4(2), article 4Google Scholar
  6. Barab S, Squire K (2004) Design-based research: putting a stake in the ground. J Learn Sci 13(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berry RQ III (2008) Access to upper-level mathematics: the stories of successful African American middle school boys. J Res Math Educ 39(5):464–488Google Scholar
  8. Brewley DN (2012) College mathematics literacy workers of the Young People's Project Chicago: a community of practice. J Urban Math Educ 5(1):44–54Google Scholar
  9. Brewley DN (2013) Mathematics literacy for liberation and liberation in mathematics literacy: [Org name] as a community of practice. In: Leonard J, Martin DB (eds.) The brilliance of Black children in mathematics: beyond the numbers and toward new discourse. Information Age Publishing, pp 273–294Google Scholar
  10. Brown A (1992) Design experiments: theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. J Learn Sci 2:141–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Charmaz K (2006) Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative research. Sage Publications Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Charron K (2009) Freedom’s teacher: the life of Septima Clark: the life of Septima Clark. Univ of North Carolina PressGoogle Scholar
  13. Civil M (2007) Building on community knowledge: an avenue to equity in mathematics education. In: Nasir N, Cobb P (eds) Improving access to mathematics: diversity and equity in the classroom. Teachers College Press, New York, pp 105–117Google Scholar
  14. D’Ambrosio U (1997) The role of mathematics education in building a just and democratic society. Learn Math 10(3):20–23Google Scholar
  15. Delpit L (1988) The silenced dialogue: power and pedagogy in educating other people’s children. Harv Educ Rev 58(3):280–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Denner J, Werner L, Ortiz O (2011) Computer games created by middle school girls: Can they be used to measure understanding of computer science concepts? Comput Educ 58:240–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dolby N, Rizvi F (2007) Youth moves: identities and education in global perspective. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Frankenstein M (1990) Incorporating race, gender, and class issues into a critical mathematics literacy curriculum. J Negro Educ, 336–347Google Scholar
  19. Gillborn D (2005) Education policy as an act of white supremacy: whiteness, critical race theory and education reform. J Educ Policy 20(4):485–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ginwright SA, Noguera P, Cammarota J (eds) (2006) Beyond resistance!: youth activism and community change: new democratic possibilities for practice and policy for America’s youth. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Glaser BG, Strauss AL (eds) (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing Company, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  22. González N, Andrade R, Civil M, Moll L (2001) Bridging funds of distributed knowledge: creating zones of practices in mathematics. J Educ Stud Placed Risk 6(1):115–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gutiérrez R (2013) The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. J Res Math Educ 44(1):37–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gutstein E (2006) Reading and writing the world with mathematics: toward a pedagogy for social justice. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Gutstein E, Peterson B (2006) Rethinking mathematics: teaching social justice by the numbers. Rethinking Schools, MiluwakeeGoogle Scholar
  26. Halverson ER (2009) Shifting learning goals: from competent tool use to participatory media spaces in the emergent design process. Cult Sci Educ 4(1):67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harel I (1991) Children designers: interdisciplinary constructions for learning and knowing mathematics in a computer-rich school. Ablex, NorwoodGoogle Scholar
  28. Hussar K, Schwartz S, Boiselle E, Noam G (2008) Toward a systematic evidence-base for science in out-of-school time: the role of assessment. Program in Education, Afterschool & Resiliency Harvard University and McLean Hospital, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Jenkins H (2008) Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: media education for the 21st century. Occasional paper on digital media and learning John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur FoundationGoogle Scholar
  30. Kafai Y, Peppler K (2011) Youth, technology, and DIY: developing participatory competencies in creative media production. In: Gadsden VL, Wortham S, Lukose R (eds) Youth cultures, language and literacy, vol 34. Review of Research in EducationGoogle Scholar
  31. Kafai Y, Peppler K, Chapman R (2009) The computer clubhouse: constructionism and creativity in youth communities (technology, education-connections series). Teachers College Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Ladson-Billings G (1995) Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. Am Educ Res J 32(3):465–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ladson-Billings G, Tate WF (2006) Toward a critical race theory of education. In: Dixson AD, Rousseau CK (eds) Critical race theory in education: all God’s children got a song. Taylor & Francis, New York, pp 11–30Google Scholar
  34. Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leonard J, Brooks W, Barnes-Johnson J, Berry RQ (2010) The nuances and complexities of teaching mathematics for cultural relevance and social justice. J Teach Educ 61(3):261–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lubenski ST (2002) A closer look at Black–White mathematics gaps: intersections of race and SES in NAEP achievement and instructional practices data. J Negro Educ 71(4):269–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martin DB (2006) Mathematics learning and participation as racialized forms of experience: African American parents speak on the struggle for mathematics literacy. Math Think Learn 8(3), 197–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Martin DB (2009) Researching race in mathematics education, vol 111. Teachers College Press, pp 295–338Google Scholar
  39. Martin DB (ed) (2010) Mathematics teaching, learning, and liberation in the lives of Black children. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  40. McCarthy C, Giardina MD, Harewood SJ, Park J-K (2003) Contesting culture: identity and curriculum dilemmas in the age of globalization, postcolonialsm, and multiplicity. Harv Educ Rev 73:449–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Morrell E (2004) Becoming critical researchers: literacy and empowerment for urban youth. Peter Lang, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Moses RP (1995) Games for enhancing mathematical understanding. US Patent # 5,520,542Google Scholar
  43. Moses RP (1996) Methods of playing games which enhance mathematical understanding. US Patent # 5,704,790Google Scholar
  44. Moses RP, Cobb CE Jr (2001) Radical equations: math literacy and civil rights. Beacon Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  45. Moses RP, Kamii M, Swap SM, Howard J (1989) The algebra project: organizing in the spirit of Ella. Harv Educ Rev 59:423–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nasir NS (2000) “Points ain’t everything”: emergent goals and average and percent understandings in the play of basketball among African American students. Anthropol Educ Q 31(3):285–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nasir NS (2008) Everyday pedagogy: lessons from basketball, track, and dominoes. Phi Delta Kappan 89(7):529–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nasir NS, Hand V, Taylor EV (2008) Culture and mathematics in school: boundaries between “cultural” and “domain” knowledge in the mathematics classroom and beyond. Rev Res Educ 32(1):187–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nicholson HJ, Collins C, Holmer H (2004) Youth as people: the protective aspects of youth development in after-school settings. Ann Am Acad Politic Soc Sci 591(1):55–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Perry T (2003) Freedom for literacy and literacy for freedom: the African-American philosophy of education. In: Perry T, Steele C, Hilliard A (eds) Young gifted and Black: promoting high achievement among African-American students. Beacon Press, Boston, pp 11–51Google Scholar
  51. Perry T, Moses R, Wynne T, Cortes J Jr, Delpit L (2010) Quality education as a constitutional right: creating a grassroots movement to transform public schools. Beacon Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  52. Quine WVO (1960) Word and object. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  53. Repenning A, Webb D, Ioannidou A (2010) Scalable game design and the development of a checklist for getting computational thinking into public schools. In: Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 265–269). ACMGoogle Scholar
  54. Resnick M, Maloney J, Monroy-Hernandez A, Rusk N, Eastmond E, Brennan K, Millner A, Rosenbaum E, Silver J, Silverman B, Kafai Y (2009) Scratch: programming for All. Commun ACM 52:60–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rogoff B (1995) Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In: Wertsch JV, Del rio P, Alvarez A (eds) Sociocultural studies of mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 139–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Saxe G (1988) The mathematics of child street vendors. Child Dev 59:1415–1425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schunk DH, Ertmer PA (1999) Self-regulatory processes during computer skill acquisition: goal and self-evaluative influences. J Educ Psychol 91(2):251–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Scott KA, White MA (2013) Compugirls’standpoint culturally responsive computing and its effect on girls of color. Urban Educ 48(5):657–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Scott KA, Sheridan K, Clark K (2014) Culturally responsive computing: a theory revisited. Learn, Media Technol. doi:10.1080/17439884.2014.924966 Google Scholar
  60. Siddle Walker V (1996) Their highest potential: an African American school community in the segregated south. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel HillCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Squire K (2011) Video games and learning: teaching and participatory culture in the digital age. Technology, education–connections (the TEC Series). Teachers College Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  62. Stinson D (2006) African American male adolescents, schooling (and mathematics: deficiency, rejection, and achievement. Rev Educ Res 76(4):477–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tate WF (2001) Science education as a civil right: urban schools and opportunities to learn considerations. J Res Sci Teach 38:1015–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tate WF, Rousseau C (2002) Access and opportunity: the political and social context of mathematics education. Handb Int Res Math Educ 271–299Google Scholar
  65. The Design-Based Research Collaborative (2003) Design based research: an emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educ Res 32:5–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tirthapura G (2008) The Young People’s Project: developing agents of change. White paper. Manag Consult Serv, BostonGoogle Scholar
  67. Varley Gutiérrez M (2012) Community spaces as part of hybrid math learning spaces: integrating multiple funds of knowledge. In: Tan E, Calabrese Barton A (eds) Empowering science and mathematics education in urban schools. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 145–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Walker EN (2006) Urban high school students academic communities and their effects on mathematics success. Am Educ Res J 43(1):43–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wright BL (2011) K-16 and beyond: African American male student engagement in STEM disciplines. J Afr Am Males Educ 2(1):5–9Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TERCCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Southern Illinois UniversityCarbondaleUSA
  3. 3.The Young People’s ProjectCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations