Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 25, Issue 6, pp 1009–1024 | Cite as

Designing the Game: How a Project-Based Media Production Program Approaches STEAM Career Readiness for Underrepresented Young Adults

  • Kristin M. Bass
  • Ingrid Hu Dahl
  • Shirin Panahandeh
Article

Abstract

Numerous studies have indicated a need for a diverse workforce that is more highly educated in STEM and ICT fields, and one that is capable of responding creatively to demands for continual innovation. This paper, in response, chronicles the implementation of the Digital Pathways (DP) program, a two-time ITEST recipient and an ongoing initiative of the Bay Area Video Coalition. DP has provided low-income, underrepresented minority young people with 180 contact hours of activities in digital media production to prepare them to pursue higher education and technology careers. A design-based research approach synthesizes staff interviews with student observations, interviews and artifacts to identify a set of generalizable best practices or design principles for empowering young people to move from being consumers of digital media to producers. These principles are illustrated with a case study of the 3D Animation and Gaming track from the second ITEST grant. Researchers argue for the importance of attending to the noncognitive elements of learning and illustrate ways in which instructors encouraged creative expression, personal agency, and collaboration through long-term projects. They also identify strategies for sustaining young people’s participation through the establishment of a supportive community environment.

Keywords

Digital media production Gaming Twenty-first-century skills Workforce development Science Technology Engineering Arts and Mathematics (STEAM) 

References

  1. Bass KM, Bandy EA (2009) Digital pathways to learning through collaborative media production. In: Tyner K (ed) New agendas for media literacy. Routledge, New York, pp 28–50Google Scholar
  2. Bay Area Video Coalition (BAVC) (2016) Next Gen Programs. https://www.bavc.org/youth-programs/next-gen
  3. Buck Institute for Education (2015) Gold standard PBL: essential project design elements. http://bie.org/blog/gold_standard_pbl_essential_project_design_elements
  4. Casner-Lotto J, Barrington L (2006) Are they really ready to work? Employers’ perspectives on the basic knowledge and applied skills of new entrants to the 21st century US workforce. The Conference Board, Inc., the partnership for 21st century skills, corporate voices for working families, and the society for human resource management. http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/FINAL_REPORT_PDF09-29-06.pdf
  5. Cobb P, Confrey J, diSessa A, Lehrer R, Schauble L (2003) Design experiments in educational research. Educ Res 32(1):9–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Denner J, Werner L (2007) Computer programming in middle school: how pairs respond to challenges. J Educ Comput Res 37(2):131–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Edelson DC (2002) Design research: what we learn when we engage in design. J Learn Sci 11(1):105–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Entertainment Software Association (2015) Essential facts about the computer and video game industry. http://www.theesa.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/ESA-Essential-Facts-2015.pdf
  9. Flanagan JC (1954) The critical incident technique. Psychol Bull 51:327–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gamasutra (2014) Gamasutra salary survey 2014. http://www.gamesetwatch.com/2014/09/05/GAMA14_ACG_SalarySurvey_F.pdf
  11. Garcia E (2014) The need to address noncognitive skills in the education policy agenda. Briefing Paper 386. Economic Policy Institute, Washington. http://s3.epi.org/files/2014/the-need-to-address-noncognitive-skills-12-02-2014.pdf
  12. Goode E, Miller CC (2013) Backlash by the Bay: tech riches alter a city. The New York Times, New York, p A1Google Scholar
  13. Grossman P (1990) The making of a teacher: teacher knowledge and teacher education. Teachers College Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Hmelo-Silver CE (2004) Problem-based learning: what and how do students learn? Educ Psychol Rev 16:235–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hu Dahl I (2009) State of the youth media field report. http://www.youthmediareporter.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/SOF-FINAL-Nov24.pdf
  16. International Game Developers Association (2015) Developer satisfaction survey 2015. Summary report. https://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.igda.org/resource/collection/CB31CE86-F8EE-4AE3-B46A-148490336605/IGDA%20DSS%202015-SummaryReport_Final_Sept15.pdf
  17. Ito M, Gutiérrez K, Livingstone S, Penuel B, Rhodes J, Salen K, Schor J, Sefton-Green J, Watkins SC (2013) Connected learning: an agenda for research and design. Digital Media and Learning Research Hub, Irvine CA. http://dmlhub.net/wp-content/uploads/files/Connected_Learning_report.pdf
  18. Kafai Y, Peppler K (2011) Youth, technology, and DIY: developing participatory competencies in creative media production. Rev Res Educ 35:89–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Landivar LC (2013) Disparities in STEM employment by sex, race, and hispanic origin. US Department of Commerce, Washington. https://www.census.gov/prod/2013pubs/acs-24.pdf
  20. Levin H (2013) The utility and need for incorporating noncognitive skills into large-scale educational assessments. In: von Davier M, Gonzalez E, Kirsch I, Yamamoto K (eds) The role of international large-scale assessments: perspectives from technology, economy, and educational research. Springer, New York, pp 67–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lindqvist E, Vestman R (2011) The labor market returns to cognitive and noncognitive ability: evidence from the Swedish enlistment. Am Econ J Appl Econ 3(1):101–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Martin A, McAlear F, Sco A (2015) Path not found: disparities to access to computer science courses in California high schools. Level Field Playing Institute, Oakland. http://www.lpfi.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/lpfi_path_not_found_report.pdf
  23. National Research Council (2011) Learning science through games and simulations. The National Academies Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  24. National Research Council (2012) Education for life and work: developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. The National Academies Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  25. National Science Board (2014) Science and engineering indicators 2014 (NSB 14-01) National Science Foundation, Arlington VA. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/index.cfm/front/f3.htm#s2
  26. National Science and Technology Council, Committee on STEM Education (2013) Federal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education 5-year strategic plan. www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/stem_stratplan_2013.pdf
  27. Panahandeh S, Bass KM, Bandy E (2011) Bay Area Video Coalition: Advanced Digital Pathways evaluation [Unpublished final report]. Rockman et al, Inc., San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  28. Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2015) Framework for 21st century learning. http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework
  29. Peppler K, Maltese A, Keune A, Chang S, Regalla L (2015) The maker ed open portfolio project: survey of makerspaces, part II. In: Chang S, Keune A, Peppler K, Regalla L (eds) Open portfolios: maker education initiative research brief series, pp 47–53. http://makered.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Open-Portfolio-Project-Research-Brief-Series_FULL_final-small.pdf
  30. Plass JL, O’Keefe PA, Homer BD, Case J, Hayward EO, Stein M, Perlin K (2013) The impact of individual, competitive, and collaborative mathematics game play on learning, performance, and motivation. J Educ Psychol 105(4):1050–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Repenning A, Webb DC, Koh KH, Nickerson H, Miller SB, Brand C, Horses IHM, Basawapatna A, Gluck F, Grover R, Gutierrez K, Repenning, N (2015) Scalable game design: A strategy to bring systemic computer science education to schools through game design and simulation creation. ACM Trans Comput Educ 15(2):1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. San Francisco Unified School District (2014) Building the digital district: preparing students for the digital world. http://www.sfusd.edu/en/assets/sfusd-staff/about-SFUSD/files/digital-district-plan.pdf
  33. Savery JR (2006) Overview of problem-based learning: definitions and distinctions. Interdiscip J Probl-Based Learn 1:9–20Google Scholar
  34. Scott KS (2014) A multilevel analysis of problem-based learning design characteristics Interdiscip J Probl-Based Learn 8(2). http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1420&context=ijpbl
  35. Shulman LS (1986) Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educ Res 15(2):4–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Silicon Valley Institute for Regional Studies (2015) Income equality in the San Francisco Bay Area. http://siliconvalleyindicators.org/pdf/income-inequality-2015-06.pdf
  37. Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  38. Thomas MK, Ge X, Greene BA (2011) Fostering 21st century skill development by engaging students in authentic game design projects in a high school computer programming class. J Educ Comput Res 44(4):391–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vossoughi S, Bevan B (2015) Making and tinkering: a review of the literature. Paper commissioned for the National Research Council Workshop on Out-of-School STEM Learning. http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_089888.pdf
  40. Wikipedia (2016) Depth of field. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depth_of_field

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristin M. Bass
    • 1
  • Ingrid Hu Dahl
    • 2
  • Shirin Panahandeh
    • 1
  1. 1.Rockman et alSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Bay Area Video CoalitionSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations