Skip to main content
Log in

Review and Discussion of Children’s Conceptions of Computers

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Today’s children grow up surrounded by computers. They observe them, interact with them and, as a consequence, start forming conceptions of how they work and what they can do. Any constructivist approach to learning requires that we gain an understanding of such preconceived ideas and beliefs in order to use computers as learning tools in an effective and informed manner. In this paper, we present five such conceptions that children reportedly form about computers, based on an interdisciplinary literature review. We then evaluate how persistent these conceptions appear to be over time and in light of new technological developments. Finally, we discuss the relevance and implications of our findings for education in the contexts of conceptual pluralism and conceptual categorisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernstein D, Crowley K (2008) Searching for signs of intelligent life: an investigation of young children’s beliefs about robot intelligence. J Learn Sci 17(2):225–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunjes S (1977) What is a computer? J Med Syst 1(1):79–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson C (2014) Towards a conceptual profile: rethinking conceptual mediation in the light of recent cognitive and neuroscientific findings. Res Sci Educ 44(3):389–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denham P (1993) Nine- to fourteen-year-old children’s conception of computers using drawings. Behav Inf Technol 12(6):346–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education, UK (2013) National Curriculum in England: Computing programmes of study: key stages 1 and 2. URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/239033/PRIMARY_national_curriculum_-_Computing.pdf. Visited on 12 Nov 2015

  • Diethelm I, Wilken H, Zumbrägel S (2012) An investigation of secondary school students’ conceptions on how the Internet works. In: Proceedings of the 12th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research. ACM, pp. 67–73

  • Eckerdal A, Thuné M (2005) Novice Java programmers’ conceptions of object and class, and variation theory. In: ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. Vol. 37. 3. ACM, pp. 89–93

  • Franco C et al (1999) From scientists’ and inventors’ minds to some scientific and technological products: relationships between theories, models, mental models and conceptions. Int J Sci Educ 21(3):277–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond M, Rogers P (2007) An investigation of children’s conceptualisation of computers and how they work. Educ Inf Technol 12(1):3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houkes W, Vermaas PE (2013) Pluralism on artefact categories: a philosophical defence. Rev Philos Psychol 4(3):543–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes M, Brackenridge A, Macleod H (1987) Children’s ideas about computers. In: Rutkowska J, Crook C (eds) Computers, cognition and development: issues for psychology and education. 1st ed. Wiley. Chap. 1, pp. 9–34

  • Hyson MC, Morris SK (1986) ‘Computers? I love them!’: young children’s concepts and attitudes about computers. Early Child Dev Care 23(1):17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISTE (2007) ISTE Standards: Students. Tech. rep. International Society for Technology in Education. URL: https://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/20-14_ISTE_Standards-S_PDF.pdf. Visited on 12 Nov 2015

  • Jarvis T, Rennie LJ (1996) Understanding technology: the development of a concept. Int J Sci Educ 18(8):977–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jervis A (2003) Children’s thinking about computers. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Conference, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh

  • Jervis A (2005) ‘It’s good for plugging-in a budgie’: children talking about computers. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Glamorgan

  • Jones N et al (2011) Mental models: an interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecol Soc 16(1)

  • Kolikant YB-D (2001) Gardeners and cinema tickets: high school students’ preconceptions of concurrency. Comput Sci Educ 11(3):221–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy ST, Mioduser D (2008) Does it ‘want’ or ‘was it programmed to..’? Kindergarten children’s explanations of an autonomous robot’s adaptive functioning. Int J Technol Des Educ 18(4):337–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malt BC, Sloman SA (2007) Artifact categorization: The good, the bad, and the ugly. In: Creations of the mind: Theories of artifacts and their representation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 85–123

  • Mawby R et al (1984) Structured interviews on children’s conceptions of computers. Tech. rep. 9. Bank Street College of Education

  • Mortimer EF (1995) Conceptual change or conceptual profile change? Sci Educ 4(3):267–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumtaz S (2002) Children’s conceptions of information and communications technology. Educ Inf Technol 7(2):155–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oleson KE et al (2010) Developmental human factors: children’s mental models of computers. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. Vol. 54. 19. SAGE Publications, pp. 1450–1453

  • Papastergiou M (2005) Students’ mental models of the internet and their didactical exploitation in informatics education. Educ Inf Technol 10(4):341–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pea RD (1986) Language-independent conceptual ‘bugs’ in novice programming. J Educ Comput Res 2(1):25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proudfoot D (2011) Anthropomorphism and AI: Turing’s much misunderstood imitation game. Artif Intell 175(5–6):950–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders I, Galpin V, Götschi T (2006) Mental models of recursion revisited. SIGCSE Bull. 38(3):138–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scaife M, van Duuren M (1995) Do computers have brains? What children believe about intelligent artifacts. Br J Devl Psychol 13(4):367–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon B et al (2006) Commonsense computing: what students know before we teach (episode 1: sorting). In: Proceedings of the second international workshop on Computing education research. ACM, pp. 29–40

  • Sorva J (2013) Notional machines and introductory programming education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 13(2)

  • Thuné M, Eckerdal A (2010) Students’ conceptions of computer programming. Tech. rep. 2010-021. Uppsala University, Computational Science

  • Tucker A et al (2003) A Model curriculum for K–12 computer science: final report of the ACM K–12 Task Force Curriculum Committee. ACM. URL: http://www.csta.acm.org/Curriculum/sub/CurrFiles/K-12ModelCurr2ndEd.pdf. Visited on 12 Nov 2015

  • Turkle S (2005) The second self: computers and the human spirit. 20th anniversary edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

  • van Duuren M, Scaife M (1995) How do children represent intelligent technology? Eur J Psychol Educ 10(3):289–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Duuren M, Scaife M (1996) ‘Because a robot’s brain hasn’t got a brain, it just controls itself’—Children’s attributions of brain related behaviour to intelligent artifacts. Eur J Psychol Educ 11(4):365–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Duuren M, Dossett B, Robinson D (1998) Gauging children’s understanding of artificially intelligent objects: a presentation of ‘counterfactuals’. Int J Behav Dev 22(4):871–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiskopf DA (2009) The plurality of concepts. Synthese 169(1):145–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe LR (1968) Computer concepts possessed by seventh-grade children. Arith Teach 15(1):35–39

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael T. Rücker.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rücker, M.T., Pinkwart, N. Review and Discussion of Children’s Conceptions of Computers. J Sci Educ Technol 25, 274–283 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9592-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9592-2

Keywords

Navigation