Abstract
Technological pedagogical content knowledge-practical (TPACK-P) refers to a unified body of knowledge that teachers develop from and for actual teaching practices with information communication technologies (ICT). This study attempted to unveil the longitudinal and multidimensional development of knowledge that teachers possess by interviewing 40 teachers with various backgrounds in subject content, years of teaching experience, and related award-winning records. An automated cluster analysis was used on the codes given to teachers’ responses based on their proficiency levels in different knowledge areas. Three different types of teachers with distinctive features were identified: technology-infusive (TI), technology transitional (TR), and planning and design (PD). TI teachers were more student-centered as compared to TR teachers who were more teacher-centered when asked about possible technology uses. PD teachers were fluent in planning and designing but lacked the balanced development demonstrated by the TI and TR teachers. These science teachers’ TPACK were found stayed at the level of “simple adoption.” These findings suggest that teachers’ TPACK-P needs to be developed with an accumulation of contextualized and dynamic experiences during ICT implementation in actual teaching. Explicit demonstrations regarding how ICTs can be used meaningfully to assist science instruction would be needed in teacher education.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amir R, Tamir P (1994) In-depth analysis of misconceptions as a basis for developing research-based remedial instruction: the case of photosynthesis. Am Biol Teach 56(2):94–100
Angeli C, Valanides N (2009) Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT–TPCK: advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Comput Educ 52(1):154–168
Archambault LM, Barnett JH (2010) Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: exploring the TPACK framework. Comput Educ 55(4):1656–1662
Bingimlas KA (2009) Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: a review of the literature. Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ 5(3):235–245
Burgoyne N, Graham CR, Sudweeks R (2010) The validation of an instrument measuring TPACK. In: Gibson D, Dodge B (eds) Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference 2010. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 132–162
Campbell T, Abd-Hamid NH (2012) Technology use in science instruction (TUSI): aligning the integration of technology in science instruction in ways supportive of science education reform. J Sci Educ Technol 22(4):572–588
Carlson E (1994) Staff development for multimedia: coping with complexity. In: Ward A (ed) Multimedia and learning: a school leader’s guide. National School Boards Association, Alexandria, pp 53–60
Chai CS, Koh JHL, Tsai CC (2010) Facilitating preservice teachers’ development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). J Educ Technol Soc 13(4):63–73
Clark CM, Peterson PL (1986) Teachers’ thought processes. In: Wittrock MC (ed) Handbook of research on teaching, 3rd edn. Macmillan, New York, pp 255–296
Creswell JW (2008) Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, 3rd edn. Pearson, Upper Saddle River
Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL (2011) Designing and conducting mixed methods research, 2nd edn. Sage, Los Angeles
Darling-Hammond L (2006) Constructing 21st-century teacher education. J Teach Educ 57(3):300–314
Davis EA, Krajcik J (2005) Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educ Res 34(3):3–14
Ertmer PA (2005) Teacher pedagogical beliefs: the final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educ Tech Res Dev 53(4):25–39
Falk A (2012) Teachers learning from professional development in elementary science: reciprocal relations between formative assessment and pedagogical content knowledge. Sci Educ 96(2):265–290
Fan YC, Wang TH, Wang KH (2012) A web-based model for developing assessment literacy of secondary in-service teachers. Comput Educ 57(2):1727–1740
Five H, Buehl M (2008) What do teachers believe? Developing a framework for examining beliefs about teachers’ knowledge and ability. Contemp Educ Psychol 33:134–176
Flick U (2002) An introduction to qualitative research. Sage, London
Friedrichsen PJ, Abell SK, Pareja EM, Brown PL, Lankford DM, Volkmann MJ (2009) Does teaching experience matter? Examining biology teachers’ prior knowledge for teaching in an alternative certification program. J Res Sci Teach 46(4):357–383
Gess-Newsome J, Lederman NG (1993) Preservice biology teachers’ knowledge structures as a function of professional teacher education: a year-long assessment. Sci Educ 77:25–45
Gipps CV (2005) What is the role for ICT-based assessment in universities? Stud High Educ 30(2):171–180
Glasson GE, McKenzie WL (1999) The development of a multi-media portfolio for enhancing learning and assessment in a K-8 science methods class. J Sci Teach Educ 10(4):335–344
Hofer BK (2000) Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemp Educ Psychol 25(4):378–405
Hsu YS, Wu HK, Hwang FK (2007) Factors influencing junior high school teachers’ computer-based instructional practices regarding their instructional evolution stages. Educ Technol Soc 10(4):118–130
Jones A, Moreland J (2004) Enhancing practicing primary school teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in technology. Int J Technol Des Educ 14:121–140
Jones A, Moreland J (2005) The importance of pedagogical knowledge in assessment for learning practices: a case-study of a whole-school approach. Curric J 16(2):193–206
Jong OD, van Driel JH, Verloop N (2005) Preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of using particle models in teaching chemistry. J Res Sci Teach 42(8):947–964
Kay RH, LeSage A (2009) Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: a review of the literature. Comput Educ 53(3):819–827
Klassen RM, Tze VMC, Betts SM, Gordon KA (2010) Teacher efficacy research 1998–2009: signs of progress or unfulfilled promise? Educ Psychol Rev 23(1):21–43
Kvale S, Brinkmann S (2009) InterViews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Sage, London
Lederman N (1999) Teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. J Res Sci Teach 36:916–929
Lumpe A, Czerniak C, Haney J, Svetlana B (2012) Beliefs about teaching science: the relationship between elementary teachers’ participation in professional development and student achievement. Int J Sci Educ 34(2):153–166
Magnusson S, Krajcik J, Borko H (1999) Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In: Gess-Newsome J, Lederman N (eds) PCK and science education. Kluwer, New York, pp 3–17
McNair S (2004) “A” is for assessment. Sci Child 42(1):18–21
Mishra P, Koehler MJ (2006) Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teach Coll Rec 108(6):1017–1054
Muwanga-Zake, J. (2006). Applications of computer-aided assessment in the diagnosis of science learning & teaching. Int J Educ Dev using ICT, 2(4). Retrieved from http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/viewarticle.php?id=226
National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future (2003) No dream denied: a pledge to America’s children. Author, Washington, DC
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. In: Quinn H, Schweingruber HA, Keller T (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press
Nespor J (1987) The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. J Curric Stud 19(4):317–328
Otero VK (2006) Moving beyond the ‘get it or don’t’ conceptions of formative assessment. J Teach Educ 57(3):247–255
Palmer DH (2002) Factors contributing to attitude exchange amongst preservice elementary teachers. Sci Educ 86(1):122–138
Ping Lim C, Yong Tay L (2003) Information and communication technologies (ICT) in an elementary school: students’ engagement in higher order thinking. J Educ Multimed Hypermedia 12(4):425–451
Ping Lim C, Pek M-S, Chai C-S (2005) Classroom management issues in information and communication technology (ICT)-mediated learning environments: back to the basics. J Educ Multimed Hypermedia 14(4):391–414
Provalis Research (2005) WordStat v6.1: computer assisted text analysis [Computer Software]. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Provalis Research
Richardson V (1996) The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In: Sikula J (ed) Handbook of research on teacher education, 2nd edn. Macmillan, New York, pp 102–119
Sadaf A, Newby TJ, Ertmer PA (2012) Exploring pre-service teachers’ beliefs about using Web 2.0 technologies in K-12 classroom. Comput Educ 59(3):937–945
Sahin I (2011) Development of survey of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). Turk Online J Educ Technol—TOJET 10(1):97–105
Sandholtz JH, Ringstaff C, Dwyer DC (1997) Teaching with technology: creating student-centered classrooms. Teachers College Press, New York
Schmidt DA, Baran E, Thompson AD, Mishra P, Koehler MJ, Shin TS (2009) Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): the development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. J Res Technol Educ 42(2):123–149
Schneider R, Plasman K (2011) Science teacher learning progressions: a review of science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge development. Rev Educ Res 81(4):530–565
Sherin MG, Drake C (2009) Curriculum strategy framework: investigating patterns in teachers’ use of a reform-based elementary mathematics curriculum. J Curric Stud 41(4):467–500
Shulman LS (1986) Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educ Res 15(2):4–14
So WW (1997) A study of teacher cognition in planning elementary science lessons. Res Sci Educ 27:71–86
Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage, Newbury Park
Thompson JR, Christensen WM, Wittmann MC (2011) Preparing future teachers to anticipate student difficulties in physics in a graduate-level course in physics, pedagogy, and education research. Phys Rev Spec Top Phys Educ Res. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.010108
Webb ME (2005) Affordances of ICT in science learning: implications for an integrated pedagogy. Int J Sci Educ 27(6):705–735
Yeh YF, Chien SP, Wu HK, Hsu YS (in press) Rubrics of TPACK-P for teaching with ICTs. In: Hsu YS (ed) Science teachers’ TPACK development. Springer, Singapore
Yeh YF, Hsu YS, Wu HK, Hwang FK, Lin TC (2014) Developing and validating technological pedagogical content knowledge—practical (TPACK-Practical) through the Delphi survey technique. Brit J Educ Technol 45(4):707–722
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yeh, YF., Lin, TC., Hsu, YS. et al. Science Teachers’ Proficiency Levels and Patterns of TPACK in a Practical Context. J Sci Educ Technol 24, 78–90 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9523-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9523-7