Skip to main content
Log in

The Effects of Study Tasks in a Computer-Based Chemistry Learning Environment

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study examines the effects of different study tasks on the acquisition of knowledge about acids and bases in a computer-based learning environment. Three different task formats were selected to create three treatment conditions: learning with gap-fill and matching tasks, learning with multiple-choice tasks, and learning only from text and figures without any additional tasks. Participants were 196 ninth-grade students who learned with a self-developed multimedia program in a pretest–posttest control group design. Research results reveal that gap-fill and matching tasks were most effective in promoting knowledge acquisition, followed by multiple-choice tasks, and no tasks at all. The findings are in line with previous research on this topic. The effects can possibly be explained by the generation–recognition model, which predicts that gap-fill and matching tasks trigger more encompassing learning processes than multiple-choice tasks. It is concluded that instructional designers should incorporate more challenging study tasks for enhancing the effectiveness of computer-based learning environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken LR (1982) Writing multiple-choice items to measure higher-order educational objectives. Educ Psychol Meas 42:803–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JR, Bower GH (1972) Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall. Psychol Rev 79:97–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JR, Bower GH (1974) A propositional theory of recognition memory. Mem Cognit 2:406–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson LW, Krathwohl DR (eds) (2001) A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing. A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo R, Bernard RM (1995) A meta-analysis of the effects of feedback in computer-based instruction. J Educ Comput Res 13:111–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bangert-Drowns RL, Kulik C-LC, Kulik JA, Morgan MT (1991) The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Rev Educ Res 61:213–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozionelos N (2002) Computer interest: a case for expressive traits. Pers Individ Differ 33:427–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SK, Pashler H (2007) Testing beyond words: using tests to enhance visuospatial map learning. Psychon Bull Rev 14:474–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clariana RB (2003) The effectiveness of constructed-response and multiple-choice study tasks in computer aided learning. J Educ Comput Res 28:395–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clariana RB, Koul R (2005) Multiple-try feedback and higher-order learning outcomes. Int J Instr Media 32:239–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Clariana RB, Lee D (2001) The effects of recognition and recall study tasks with feedback in a computer-based vocabulary lesson. Educ Technol Res Dev 49:23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsches Pisa-Konsortium (ed) (2006) PISA 2003. Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente [PISA 2003. Documentation of measuring instruments]. Waxmann, Münster

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins IG, Kroll NEA, Yonelinas AP, Liu Q (1998) Distinctiveness in recognition and free recall: the role of recollection in the rejection of the familiar. J Mem Lang 38:381–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duit R, Häußler P, Prenzel M (2001) Schulleistungen im Bereich der naturwissenschaftlichen Bildung [School performance in the area of science education]. In: Weinert FE (ed) Leistungsmessung in Schulen. Beltz, Weinheim, pp 169–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillund G, Shiffrin RM (1984) A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychol Rev 91:1–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glover JA (1989) The “testing” phenomenon: not gone but nearly forgotten. J Educ Psychol 81:392–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haladyna TM, Downing SM, Rodriguez MC (2002) A review of multiple-choice item-writing guidelines for classroom assessment. Appl Meas Educ 15:309–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie J, Timperley H (2007) The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res 77:81–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang SHK, McDermott KB, Roediger HL III (2007) Test format and corrective feedback modulate the effect of testing on memory retention. Eur J Cognit Psychol 19:528–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpicke JD, Blunt JR (2011) Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science 331:772–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch W (1974) The representation of meaning in memory. Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozma R, Russell J (2005) Multimedia learning of chemistry. In: Mayer RE (ed) The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 409–428

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis JR (2002) Psychometric evaluation of the PSSUQ using data from five years of usability studies. Int J Hum Comput Interact 14:463–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Limniou M, Roberts D, Papadopoulos N (2008) Full immersive virtual environment CAVE in chemistry education. Comput Educ 51:584–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh HW, Craven RG (2006) Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspective. Perspect Psychol Sci 1:133–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh HW, Byrne BM, Shavelson RJ (1988) The multifaceted academic self-concept: its hierarchical structure and its relation to academic achievement. J Educ Psychol 80:366–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nick S (2006) CHEMnet—analysis of the use of special features and multimedia elements of an online chemistry course. J Chem Educ 83:1099–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nick S, Andresen J, Lübker B, Thumm L (2003) CHEMnet—structure, design, and evaluation of an online chemistry course. J Sci Educ Technol 12:333–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okebukala PA (1993) The gender factor in computer anxiety and interest among some Australian high school students. Educ Res 35:181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park J (2005) Learning in a new computerized testing system. J Educ Psychol 97:436–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park J, Choi B-C (2008) Higher retention after a new take-home computerised test. Br J Educ Technol 39:538–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger HL III, Butler AC (2011) The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends Cognit Sci 15:20–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger HL III, Karpicke JD (2006) Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychol Sci 17:249–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotello CM, Heit E (1999) Two-process models of recognition memory: evidence for recall-to-reject? J Mem Lang 40:432–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senkbeil M, Drechsel B (2004) Vertrautheit mit dem Computer [Familiarity with the computer]. In: Deutsches Pisa-Konsortium (ed) PISA 2003. Der Bildungsstand der Jugendlichen in Deutschland—Ergebnisse des zweiten internationalen Vergleichs. Waxmann, Münster, pp 177–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Senkbeil M, Wittwer J (2007) Die Computervertrautheit von Jugendlichen und Wirkungen der Computernutzung auf den fachlichen Kompetenzerwerb [Adolescents’ computer literacy and effects of computer use on competence acquisition]. In: Deutsches Pisa-Konsortium (ed) PISA 2006. Die Ergebnisse der dritten internationalen Vergleichsstudie, Waxmann, pp 277–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT (2002) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Urhahne D, Jeschke J, Krombaß A, Harms U (2004) Die Validierung von Fragebogenerhebungen zum Interesse an Tieren und Pflanzen durch computergestützte Messdaten [The validation of questionnaire data on interest in animals and plants with log files]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie 18:213–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urhahne D, Nick S, Schanze S (2009) The effect of three-dimensional simulations on the understanding of chemical structures and their properties. Res Sci Educ 39:495–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams J (1963) Comparison of several response modes in a review program. J Educ Psychol 54:253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams J (1965) Effectiveness of constructed-response and multiple-choice programming modes as a function of test mode. J Educ Psychol 56:111–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yun S, Miller PC, Baek Y, Jung J, Ko M (2008) Improving recall and transfer skills through vocabulary building in web-based second language learning: an examination by item and feedback type. Educ Technol Soc 11:158–172

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Detlef Urhahne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Urhahne, D., Nick, S., Poepping, A.C. et al. The Effects of Study Tasks in a Computer-Based Chemistry Learning Environment. J Sci Educ Technol 22, 993–1003 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9445-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9445-9

Keywords

Navigation