Abstract
The impacts of biotechnology are found in nearly all sectors of society from health care and food products to environmental issues and energy sources. Despite the significance of biotechnology within the sciences, it has not become a prominent trend in science education. In this study, we seek to more fully identify biology teachers’ concerns about biotechnology instruction and their reported practices. Consistent with the Stages of Concern framework as modified by Hord et al., we investigated teachers’ awareness, informational, personal, management, consequences, collaboration, and refocusing concerns about biotechnology teaching by employing a qualitative design that allowed for the emergence of teachers’ ideas. Twenty high school life science teachers attending a biotechnology institute were interviewed using an interview protocol specifically designed to target various Stages of Concern. Although the Stages of Concern framework guided the development of interview questions in order to target a wide range of concerns, data analysis employed a grounded theory approach wherein patterns emerged from teachers’ own words and were constantly compared with each other to generate larger themes. Our results have potential to provide guidance for professional development providers and curriculum developers committed to supporting initial implementation of biotechnology education. Recommendations include supporting teacher development of biotechnology content knowledge; promoting strategies for obtaining, storing and managing biotechnology equipment and materials; providing opportunities for peer teaching as a means of building teacher confidence; and highlighting career opportunities in biotechnology and the intersections of biotechnology and everyday life.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson SE (1997) Understanding teacher change: revisiting the concerns based adoption model. Curriculum Inq 27:331–367
Bailey DB, Palsha SA (1992) Qualities of the Stages of Concern Questionnaire and implications for educational innovations. J Educ Res 85:226–232
Bigler AM, Hanegan NL (2011) Student content knowledge increases after participation in a hands-on biotechnology intervention. J Sci Educ Technol 20:246–257
Brown DC, Kemp MC, Hall J (1998) On teaching biotechnology in Kentucky. J Ind Teach Educ 35(4):44–60
Bryce T, Gray D (2004) Tough acts to follow: the challenges to science teachers presented by biotechnological progress. Int J Sci Educ 26:717–733
Chen S, Raffan J (1999) Biotechnology: students’ knowledge and attitudes in the UK and Taiwan. J Biol Educ 34:17–23
Cheung D, Hattie J, Ng D (2001) Reexamining the Stages of Concern Questionnaire: a test of alternative models. J Educ Res 94:226–236
Dahm AS (2005) The role of professional graduate degrees in meeting current and future biotechnology industry workforce needs. J Biotechnol 118:S186
Dawson V (2007) An exploration of high school (12–17 year old) students’ understandings of, and attitudes towards biotechnology processes. Res Sci Educ 37:59–73
Dawson V, Schibeci R (2003) Western Australian school students’ understanding of biotechnology. Int J Sci Educ 25:57–69
Dawson V, Soames C (2006) The effect of biotechnology education on Australian high school students’ understandings and attitudes about biotechnology processes. Res Sci Technol Educ 24:183–198
Dori YJ, Tal RT, Tsaushu M (2003) Teaching biotechnology through case studies—can we improve higher order thinking skills of nonscience majors? Sci Educ 87:767–793
Garrett S (2009) Professional development for the integration of biotechnology education. Unpublished masters of education thesis, Queensland University of Technology
Gunter B, Kinderler J, Beyleveld D (1998) Teenagers and biotechnology: a survey of understanding and opinion in Britain. Stud Sci Educ 32:81–112
Hall GE, Loucks S (1978) Teacher concerns as a basis for facilitating and personalizing staff development. Teach Coll Rec 80:36–53
Hanegan NL, Bigler A (2009) Infusing authentic inquiry into biotechnology. J Sci Educ Technol 18:393–401
Hord SM, Rutherford WL, Huling-Austin L, Hall GE (1987) Taking charge of change. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria
Kidman G (2010) What is an ‘interesting curriculum’ for biotechnology education? Students and teachers opposing views. Res Sci Educ 40:353–373
Klop T, Severiens S, Knippels M, van Mil MHW, Ten Dam GTM (2010) Effects of a science education module on attitudes towards modern biotechnology of secondary school students. Int J Sci Educ 32:1127–1150
Kwon H, Change M (2009) Technology teachers’ beliefs about biotechnology and its instruction in South Korea. J Technol Stud 35:67–75
Leslie G, Schibeci R (2003) What do science teachers think biotechnology is? Does it matter? Aust Sci Teach J 49(3):16–21
Lock R, Miles C (1993) Biotechnology and genetic engineering: students’ knowledge and attitudes. J Biol Educ 27:267–272
Maxwell JA (2010) Using numbers in qualitative research. Qual Inq 16:475–482
Michael M, Grinyer A, Turner J (1997) Teaching biotechnology: identity in the context of ignorance and knowledgeability. Public Underst Sci 6:1–17
Moreland J, Jones A, Cowie B (2006) Developing pedagogical content knowledge for the new sciences: the example of biotechnology. Teach Educ 17:143–155
National Research Council (1996) National science education standards. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
National Research Council (2009) A New Biology for the 21st Century. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
National Research Council (2011) A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas (advance copy). National Academy Press, Washington, DC
Olsher G, Dreyfus A (1999) Biotechnologies as a context for enhancing junior high-school students’ ability to ask meaningful questions about abstract biological processes. Int J Sci Educ 21:137–153
Ozel A, Terzi I, Ozel E (2009) Awareness of biological application: a study among university geography students. Education 129:714–723
Prokop P, Leskova A, Kubiatko M, Diran C (2007) Slovakian students’ knowledge of and attitudes toward biotechnology. Int J Sci Educ 29:895–907
Reicks M, Stoebner T, Hassel C, Carr T (1996) Evaluation of a decision case approach to food biotechnology education at the secondary level. J Nutr Educ 28:33–38
Scott DG, Washer BA, Wright MD (2006) A Delphi study to identify recommended biotechnology competencies for first-year/initially certified technology education teachers. J Technol Educ 17:43–55
Steele F, Aubusson P (2004) The challenge in teaching biotechnology. Res Sci Educ 34:365–387
Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage, Newbury Park
Thieman WJ, Palladino MA (2003) Introduction to biotechnology. Benjamin Cummings, San Francisco
Turkmen L, Darcin ES (2007) A comparative study of Turkish elementary and science education major students’ knowledge levels at the popular biotechnological issues. Int J Environ Sci Educ 2:125–131
Zeller MF (1994) Biotechnology in the high school biology curriculum: the future is here! Am Biol Teach 56:460–464
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Borgerding, L.A., Sadler, T.D. & Koroly, M.J. Teachers’ Concerns About Biotechnology Education. J Sci Educ Technol 22, 133–147 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9382-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9382-z