Skip to main content
Log in

Misconceptions About Sound Among Engineering Students

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our first objective was to detect misconceptions about the microscopic nature of sound among senior university students enrolled in different engineering programmes (from chemistry to telecommunications). We sought to determine how these misconceptions are expressed (qualitative aspect) and, only very secondarily, to gain a general idea of the extent to which they are held (quantitative aspect). Our second objective was to explore other misconceptions about wave aspects of sound. We have also considered the degree of consistency in the model of sound used by each student. Forty students answered a questionnaire including open-ended questions. Based on their free, spontaneous answers, the main results were as follows: a large majority of students answered most of the questions regarding the microscopic model of sound according to the scientifically accepted model; however, only a small number answered consistently. The main model misconception found was the notion that sound is propagated through the travelling of air particles, even in solids. Misconceptions and mental-model inconsistencies tended to depend on the engineering programme in which the student was enrolled. However, students in general were inconsistent also in applying their model of sound to individual sound properties. The main conclusion is that our students have not truly internalised the scientifically accepted model that they have allegedly learnt. This implies a need to design learning activities that take these findings into account in order to be truly efficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alonzo AC, Steedle JT (2009) Developing and assessing a force and motion learning progression. Sci Educ 93:389–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azar A (2010) A comparison of the effects of two physics laboratory applications with different approaches on student physics achievement. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B Soc Educ Stud 2:161–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett M, Wagner H, Gatling A, Anderson J, Houle M, Kafka A (2006) The impact of science fiction film on student understanding of science. J Sci Educ Technol 15:179–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee RW (2003) The teaching of science: content, coherence, and congruence. J Sci Educ Technol 12:343–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çalik M (2011) How did creating a constructivist learning environment influence my graduate students’ views? Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B Soc Educ Stud 3:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Çalik M, Ayas A (2005) A comparison of level of understanding of eighth-grade students and science student teachers related to selected chemistry concepts. J Res Sci Teach 42:638–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çalik M, Ayas A, Ebenezer JV (2005) A review of solution chemistry studies: insights into students’ conceptions. J Sci Educ Technol 14:29–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çalik M, Ayas A, Coll RK (2010a) Investigating the effectiveness of teaching methods based on a four-step constructivist strategy. J Sci Educ Technol 19:32–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çalik M, Kolomuc A, Karagolge Z (2010b) The effect of conceptual change pedagogy on students’ conceptions of rate of reaction. J Sci Educ Technol 19:422–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çalik M, Okur M, Taylor N (2010b) A comparison of different conceptual change pedagogies employed within the topic of “sound propagation”. J Sci Educ Technol. doi:10.1007/s10956-010-9266-z

  • Chang HP, Chen JY, Guo CJ, Chen CC, Chang CY, Lin SH, Su WJ, Lain KD, Hsu SY, Lin JL, Chen CC, Cheng YT, Wang LS, Tseng YT (2007) Investigating primary and secondary students’ learning of physics concepts in Taiwan. Int J Sci Educ 29:465–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu H-E, Treagust DF, Chandrasegaran AL (2008) Naïve students’ conceptual development and beliefs: the need for multiple analyses to determine what contributes to student success in a university introductory physics course. Res Sci Educ 38:111–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coll RK (2005) The role of models/and analogies in science education: implications from research. Int J Sci Educ 27:183–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coll RK, Treagust DF (2003) Learners’ mental models of metallic bonding: a cross-age study. Sci Educ 87:685–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coruhlu-Senel T, Çalik M, Cepni S (2012) Effect of conceptual change pedagogies on students’ alternative conceptions of electricity resistance and electricity current. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B Soc Educ Stud 4:141–152

    Google Scholar 

  • diSessa AA (1988) Knowledge in pieces. In: Forman G, Pufall PB (eds) Constructivism in the computer age. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • diSessa AA (1993) Toward an epistemology of physics. Cogn Instr 10:105–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duit R (2009) Students’ and teachers’ conceptions and science education (bibliography). http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html. Accessed 25 June 2010

  • Er Nas S, Çalik M, Cepni S (2012) Effect of different conceptual change pedagogies embedded within 5E model on grade 6 students’ alternative conceptions of ‘heat transfer’. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B Soc Educ Stud 4:177–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Eshach H, Schwartz JL (2006) Sound stuff? Naive materialism in middle-school students’ conceptions of sound. Int J Sci Educ 28:733–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gokdere M, Çalik M (2010) A cross-age study of Turkish students’ mental models: an “atom” concept. Didactica Slovenica-Pedagoska Obzorja 25:185–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves FH, Pugh AF (2002) Cognitive illusions as hindrances to learning complex environmental issues. J Sci Educ Technol 11:381–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamza KM, Wickman PO (2008) Describing and analysing learning in action: an empirical study of the importance of misconceptions in learning science. Sci Educ 92:141–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houle ME, Barnett GM (2008) Students’ conceptions of sound waves resulting from the enactment of a new technology-enhanced inquiry-based curriculum on urban bird communication. J Sci Educ Technol 17:242–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrepic Z (1999) Students’ concepts in understanding of sound. Paper presented at the fourth croatian symposium on physics education: role of experiment in physics education 1999 in Novi Vinodolski, Croatia, arXiv:1105.3995v1 [physics.ed-ph]. Available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.3995. Accessed 23 May 2011

  • Hrepic Z (2004) Development of a real-time assessment of students’ mental models of sound propagation. PhD thesis, Kansas State University. http://web.phys.ksu.edu/role/sound/. Accessed 16 May 2011

  • Hrepic Z, Zollman D, Rebello S (2010) Identifying students’ mental models of sound propagation: the role of conceptual blending in understanding conceptual change. Phys Rev ST Phys Educ Res 6:020114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsson A, Mäkitalo Å, Säljö R (2009) Conceptions of knowledge in research on students’ understanding of the greenhouse effect: methodological positions and their consequences for representations of knowing. Sci Educ 93:978–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly G, Chen C (1999) The sound of music: constructing science as sociocultural practices through oral and written discourse. J Res Sci Teach 36:883–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirch SA (2010) Identifying and resolving uncertainty as a mediated action in science: a comparative analysis of the cultural tools used by scientists and elementary science students at work. Sci Educ 94:308–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurnaz MA, Çalik M (2009) A thematic review of ‘energy’ teaching studies: focuses, needs, methods, general knowledge claims and implications. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B Soc Educ Stud 1:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Leite L, Afonso A (2001) Portuguese school textbooks’ illustrations and students’ alternative conceptions on sound. In: Pinto R, Surinach S (eds) Physics teacher education beyond 2000. Elsevier, Paris, pp 167–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder CJ (1993) University physics students’ conceptualizations of factors affecting the speed of sound propagation. Int J Sci Educ 15:655–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linder CJ, Erickson GL (1989) A study of tertiary physics students’ conceptualizations of sound. Int J Sci Educ 11:491–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazens K, Lautrey J (2003) Conceptual change in physics: children’s naive representations of sound. Cogn Dev 18:159–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menchen KVP, Thompson JR (2003) Teacher understanding of propagation and resonance in sound phenomena. http://perlnet.umaine.edu/research/2003MenchenThompsonPERC.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2009

  • Pejuan A (2009) Introducció a l’Acústica. http://baldufa.upc.es/arcadi/index.htm. Accessed 10 May 2011

  • Pejuan A, Novell M, Bohigas X, Jaén X (2008) Mòduls multimèdia com a suport per l’aprenentatge de l’acústica. Paper presented at the Jornada de presentació de resultats dels projectes de millora de la docència, ICE-UPC, February 2008, in Barcelona. http://hdl.handle.net/2099/4674. Accessed 30 Jan 2011

  • Periago MC, Bohigas X (2005) A study of second-year engineering students’ alternative conceptions about electric potential, current intensity and Ohm’s law. Eur J Eng Educ 30:71–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Periago C, Pejuan A, Jaén X, Bohigas X (2009) Misconceptions about the propagation of sound waves. Paper presented at the European association for education in electrical and information engineering annual conference, July 2009, in Valencia, Spain

  • Podolefsky NS, Finkelstein ND (2006) Use of analogy in learning physics: the role of representations. Phys Rev ST Phys Educ Res 2:020101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podolefsky NS, Finkelstein ND (2007) Analogical scaffolding and the learning of abstract ideas in physics: empirical studies. Phys Rev ST Phys Educ Res 3:020104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt H (1997) Students’ misconceptions—looking for a pattern. Sci Educ 81:123–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smolkin LB, McTigue EM, Donovan CA, Coleman JM (2009) Explanation in science trade books recommended for use with elementary students. Sci Educ 93:587–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teodoro VD (2006) Embedding modelling in the general physics course: rationale & tools. Paper presented at the GIREP conference 2006—“Modelling in Physics and Physics Education”, August 2006, in Amsterdam, Netherlands

  • Tribus M (2005) Some remarks on the improvement of engineering education. J Sci Educ Technol 14:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West E (2008) Teaching about sound, hearing and health—knowledge base, suggestions for teaching and copying material. University of Gothenburg. ISSN 1651-9531, http://hdl.handle.net/2077/18685. Accessed 15 Mar 2009

  • Wittmann MC, Steinberg RN, Redish EF (2003) Understanding and affecting student reasoning about sound waves. Int J Sci Educ 25:991–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz S, Eryilmaz A (2010) Integrating gender and group differences into bridging strategy. J Sci Educ Technol 19:341–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was carried out within the framework of the research project SEJ2007-68113-C02-02, financed by the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arcadi Pejuan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pejuan, A., Bohigas, X., Jaén, X. et al. Misconceptions About Sound Among Engineering Students. J Sci Educ Technol 21, 669–685 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9356-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9356-6

Keywords

Navigation