Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Middle School Students’ Science Self-Efficacy and Its Sources: Examination of Gender Difference

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main purpose of the present study is to investigate middle school students’ science self-efficacy as well as its sources and outcomes as a function of gender. Bandura’s hypothesized sources of self-efficacy (i.e., mastery experience, vicarious experience, verbal persuasion, and emotional arousal) in addition to being inviting with self and inviting with others were examined as sources of self-efficacy, while cognitive and metacognitive strategy use was examined as an outcome of self-efficacy. A total of 1,932 students participated in the study and were administered self-report instruments. Results showed that the relationship between science self-efficacy and its proposed sources does not change as a function of gender. All proposed sources, except for vicarious experience, were found to be significantly related to students’ scientific self-efficacy. Moreover, girls were found to experience significantly more emotional arousal and to send positive messages to others more than boys. On the other hand, no gender difference was found concerning science self-efficacy and strategy use. The findings also revealed a positive association between science self-efficacy and strategy use. Overall, findings supported Bandura’s conception of self-efficacy and suggested invitations as additional sources of self-efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Akyol G, Sungur S, Tekkaya C (2010) The contribution of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to students’ science achievement. Educ Res Eval 16:1–22. doi:10.1080/13803611003672348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderman EM, Young AJ (1994) Motivation and strategy use in science: Individual differences and classroom effects. J Res Sci Teach 31:811–831. doi:10.1002/tea.3660310805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1977) Social learning theory. General Learning Press, New York

  • Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1993) Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educ Psychol 28:117–148. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1997) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bidjerano T (2005) Gender differences in self-regulated learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Northeastern Educational Research Association, Kerhonkson

  • Britner SL, Pajares F (2006) Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. J Res Sci Teach 43:485–499. doi:10.1002/tea.20131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler DL, Winne PH (1995) Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis. Rev Educ Res 65:245–281. doi:10.3102/00346543065003245

    Google Scholar 

  • Dembo MH, Eaton MJ (2000) Self-regulation of academic learning in middle-level schools. Elem Sch J 100:473–490. doi:10.1086/499651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles J (1987) Gender roles and women’s achievement-related decisions. Psychol Women Q 11:135–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles J (1994) Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices: applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Psychol Women Q 18:585–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell JH (1987) Speculation about the nature and development of metacognition. In: Weinert F, Kluwe R (eds) Metacognition, motivation, and understanding. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 21–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell JH (1992) Perspectives on perspective taking. In: Beilin H, Pufall P (eds) Piaget’s theory: prospects and possibilities. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 107–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackett G (1985) The role of mathematics self-efficacy in the choice of math- related majors of college women and men: a path model. J Counsel Psychol 32:47–56. doi:10.1037//0022-0167.32.1.47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackett G, Betz NE (1981) A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women. J Vocat Behav 18:326–339. doi:10.1016/0001-8791(81)90019-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie J, Biggs J, Purdie N (1996) Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: a meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res 66:99–136. doi:10.3102/00346543066002099

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy AW (2004) What do teachers know about self-efficacy? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego

  • Junge ME, Dretzke BJ (1995) Mathematical self-efficacy gender differences in gifted/talented adolescents. Gift Child Q 39:22–28. doi:10.1177/001698629503900104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen R (2004) A cross-cultural investigation of the efficacy beliefs of South Asian immigrant and Anglo non-immigrant early adolescents. J Educ Psychol 96:731–742. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lent RW, Lopez FG, Bieschke KJ (1991) Mathematics self-efficacy: sources and relation to science-based career choice. J Counsel Psychol 38:424–430. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.38.4.424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lent RW, Lopez FG, Brown ST, Gore PA Jr (1996) Latent structure of the sources of mathematics self-efficacy. J Vocat Behav 49:292–308. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1996.0045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnenbrink EA, Pintrich PR (2003) The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Read Writ Q 19:119–137. doi:10.1080/10573560308223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingston J (1997) Metacognition: an overview. Retrieved 20 Jan 2010 from http://www.gse.buffalo.edu/fas/shuell/cep564/Metacog.htm

  • Lopez FG, Lent RW (1992) Sources of mathematics self-efficacy in high school students. Career Dev Q 41:3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lytton H, Romney DM (1991) Parents’ differential socialization of boys and girls: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 109:267–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metallidou P, Vlachou A (2007) Motivational beliefs, cognitive engagement, and achievement in language and mathematics in elementary school children. Int J Psychol 42(1):2–15. doi:10.1080/00207590500411179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neber H, Schommer-Aikins M (2002) Self-regulated science learning with highly gifted students: the role of cognitive, motivational, epistemological, and environmental variables. High Ability Stud 13:59–74. doi:10.1080/13598130220132316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil HF, Abedi J (1996) Reliability and validity of a state metacognitive inventory: potential for alternative assessment. J Educ Res 89:234–245. doi:10.1080/00220671.1996.9941208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares F (1994) Inviting self-efficacy: the role of invitations in the development of confidence and competence in writing. J Invit Theory Practice 3:13–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares F (1996) Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Rev Educ Res 66:543–578. doi:10.3102/00346543066004543

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares F (1997) Current directions in self-efficacy research. In: Maehr ML, Pintrich PR (eds) Advances in motivation and achievement, vol 10. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 1–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares F (2008) Motivational role of self-efficacy beliefs in self-regulated learning. In: Schunk DH, Zimmerman BJ (eds) Motivation and self-regulated learning:theory, research, and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum, New York, pp 111–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallant J (2001) SPSS Survival Manual. Open University Press, Milton Keynes

  • Paulsen MB, Feldman KA (2005) The conditional and interaction effects of epistemological beliefs on the self-regulated learning of college students: motivational strategies. Res High Educ 46:731–768. doi:10.1007/s11162-006-9029-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich PR (2002) The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching and assessing. Theory Practice 41:219–225. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4104_3

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich PR, De Groot E (1990) Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. J Educ Psychol 82:33–40. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich PR, Schunk DH (2002) Motivation in education: theory, research, and applications. Merrill, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich PR, Smith DAF, Garcia T, Mckeachie WJ (1991) A Manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). National Centre for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich PR, Smith DAF, Garcia T, Mckeachie WJ (1993) Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educ Psychol Measur 53:810–813. doi:10.1177/0013164493053003024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purkey WW (1992) An introduction to invitational theory. J Invit Theory Practice 1:5–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Purkey WW, Novak J (1996) Inviting school success: a self-concept approach to teaching, learning, and democratic practice, 3rd edn. Wadsworth, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray MW, Garavalia LS, Gredler ME (2003) Gender differences in self-regulated learning, task value, and achievement in developmental college students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago

  • Schraw G, Dennison RS (1994) Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemp Educ Psychol 19:460–475. doi:10.1006/ceps.1994.1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw G, Moshman D (1995) Metacognitive theories. Educ Psychol Rev 7:351–371. doi:10.1007/BF02212307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk DH (2004) Learning theories: an educational perspective, 4th edn. Pearson, Merill Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Sungur S (2007) Modeling the relationships among students’ motivational beliefs, metacognitive strategy use, and effort regulation. Scand J Educ Res 51:315–326. doi:10.1080/00313830701356166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sungur S, Senler S (2009) An analysis of Turkish high school students’ metacognition and motivation. Educ Res Eval 15:43–59. doi:10.1080/13803610802591667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2007) Using multivariate statistics. HarperCollins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher EL (2009) Sources of middle school students’ self-efficacy in mathematics: a qualitative investigation of student, teacher, and parent perspectives. Am Educ Res J 46:275–314. doi:10.3102/0002831208324517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usher EL, Pajares F (2006a) Sources of academic and self-regulatory efficacy beliefs of entering middle school students. Contemp Educ Psychol 31:125–141. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usher EL, Pajares F (2006b) Inviting confidence in school: invitations as a critical source of the academic self-efficacy beliefs of entering middle school students. J Invit Theory Practice 12:7–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher EL, Pajares F (2008) Sources of self-efficacy in school: critical review of the literature and future directions. Rev Educ Res 78:751–796. doi:10.3102/0034654308321456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valiante G, Pajares F (1999) The inviting/disinviting index: Instrument validation and relation to motivation and achievement. J Invit Theory Practice 6:28–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Valiante G, Pajares F (2002) Inviting one’s self and inviting others: influence of gender, grade level, and gender orientation. J Invit Theory Practice 8:41–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenman MVJ, Van Hout-Wolters BHAM, Afflerbach P (2006) Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacogn Learn 1:3–14. doi:10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinert FE, Kluwe RH (1987) Metacognition, motivation and understanding. Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisgram ES, Bigler RS (2006) Girls and science careers: the role of altruistic values and attitudes about specific tasks. J Appl Dev Psychol 27:326–348. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2006.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiemer D, Purkey W (1994) Love thyself as thy neighbor?: self-other orientations of inviting behaviors. J Invit Theory Practice 3:25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolters CA, Pintrich PR (1998) Contextual differences in student motivation and self-regulated learning in mathematics, English, and social studies classroom. Instr Sci 26:27–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeldin AL, Britner SL, Pajares F (2008) A comparative study of the self-efficacy beliefs of successful men and women in mathematics, science, and technology careers. J Res Sci Teach 45:1036–1058. doi:10.1002/tea.20195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelezny LC, Chua P, Aldrich C (2000) Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. J Soc Issues 56:443–457. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman BJ (1994) Dimensions of academic self regulation: a conceptual framework for education. In: Schunk DH, Zimmerman BJ (eds) Self-regulation of learning and performance: issues and educational applications. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman BJ, Martinez-Pons M (1990) Student differences in self-regulated learning: relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. J Educ Psychol 82:51–59. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, Department of Elementary Education, Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat, Turkey

    Dekant Kıran

  2. Faculty of Education, Department of Elementary Education, Middle East Technical University, 06531, Ankara, Turkey

    Semra Sungur

Authors
  1. Dekant Kıran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Semra Sungur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Semra Sungur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kıran, D., Sungur, S. Middle School Students’ Science Self-Efficacy and Its Sources: Examination of Gender Difference. J Sci Educ Technol 21, 619–630 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9351-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9351-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation