Abstract
This article re-examines the learning environment in an after-school science program for socio-economically disadvantaged children, attempting to discover why the particular group we studied failed to make significant progress between pre and post program testing, while other groups undergoing the same program elsewhere succeeded. Data composed of in class observations, students’ class workbooks and perceptive/cognitive interviews was analyzed qualitatively to construct a picture of the learning environment as experienced by both the students and their student teacher, Liora. Our primary finding revealed a striking dissonance between the program’s student-centered theory (based on the tenets of social-constructivism) and the classroom reality enforced by Liora, who ran the lessons primarily as a monologue that left very little room for active student participation. This disparity was further complicated by an ambiguity in Liora’s position as an authority figure, wherein she wavered between her predilection for a rigid, authoritative teaching environment and a desire to be her students’ friend and confidante.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amit M, Fried MN (2005) Authority and authority relations in mathematics education: a view from an 8th grade classroom. Educ Stud Math 58(2):145–168
Baker JA (1999) Teacher–student interaction in urban at-risk classrooms: differential behavior, relationship quality, and student satisfaction with school. Elementary School J 100(1):57–70
Bonney CR, Kempler TM, Zusho A, Coppola BP, Pintrich PR (2005) Student learning in science classroom: what role does motivation play. In: Alsop S (ed) Beyond Cartesian dualism: encountering affect in the teaching and learning of science. Springer, Berlin, pp 83–97
Bullough RV, Young J, Draper RJ (2004) One-year teaching internships and the dimensions of beginning teacher development. Teach Teach Theory Practice 10(4):365–394
Chin C (2006) Classroom interaction in science: teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses. Int J Sci Educ 28(11):1315–1346
Chin C, Brown DE (2000) Learning deeply in science: an analysis and reintegration of deep approaches in two case studies of grade 8 students. Res Sci Educ 30(2):173–197
Chin C, Brown DE (2002) Student-generated question: a meaningful aspect of learning in science. Int J Sci Educ 24(5):521–549
Collins A, Joseph D, Bielaczyc K (2004) Design research: theoretical and methodological issues. J Learn Sci 13(1):15–42
Doppelt Y, Schunn CD (2004) What is your science classroom environment like? In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference of the learning science, pp 593–596
Dorman JP (2002) Classroom environment research: progress and possibilities. Qld J Educ Res 18:112–140
Driver R (1989) The construction of scientific knowledge in school classrooms. In: Millar R (ed) Doing science: images of science in science education. Falmer Press, London, pp 83–106
Driver R, Asoko H, Leach J, Mortimer E, Scott P (1994) Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educ Res 23(7):5–12
Eshach H (2006) Bridging in-school and out-of-school learning: formal, non-formal, and informal education. J Sci Educ Technol 16(2):171–190
Foo SF, Looi CK (2006) A case study of elementary students’ argumentation in science. International Society of the Learning Science
Fraser BJ (1998) Science learning environments: assessment, effects and determinants. In: Fraser BJ, Tobin KG (eds) International handbook of science education. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 527–564
Fraser BJ (2002) Learning environments research: yesterday, today and tomorrow. In: Goh SC, Khine MS (eds) Studies in educational learning environments: an international perspective. World Scientific, River Edge, pp 1–25
Friedman P, Rodriguez F, McComb J (2001) Why student do and do not attend classes: myths and realities. College Teach 49(4):124–133
Hayes MT (2002) Elementary preservice teachers’ struggles to define inquiry-based science teaching. J Sci Teacher Educ 13:147–165
Jordan B, Henderson A (1995) Interaction analysis: foundations and practice. J Learn Sci 1:39–103
Khine MS, Fisher DL (2001, December) Classroom environment and teacher’s cultural background in secondary science classes in an Asian Context. Paper presented at International Educational Research Conference of Australian Association of Research in Education, Perth
Kinchin IM (2004) Investigating students’ beliefs about their preferred role as learners. Educ Res 46(3):301–312
Koul RB, Fisher DL (2005) Cultural background and students’ perceptions of science classroom learning environments and teacher interpersonal behavior in Jammu, India. Learn Environ Res 8:195–211
Lipka RP, Brinthaupt TM (1999) The role of the self in teacher development. Suny Press, Albany
Lotter C (2004) Preservice science teachers’ concerns through classroom observations and student teaching: special focus on inquiry teaching. Sci Educ 13(1):29–38
Mahoney JL, Lord H, Carryl E (2005) An ecological analysis of after-school program participation and the development of academic performance and motivational attributes for disadvantaged children. Child Dev 76:811–825
Meyer H (2004) Novice and expert teachers’ conceptions of learners’ prior knowledge. Sci Educ 88(6):970–983
Mintzes JJ, Wandersee JH (1998) Reform and innovation in science teaching: a human constructivist view. In: Mintzes JJ, Wandersee JH, Novak JD (eds) Teaching science for understanding. A human constructivist view. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 29–58
Oliveira AW (2010) Improving teacher questioning in science inquiry discussions through professional development. J Res Sci Teach 74:422–453
Osborne J, Dillon J (2007) Research on learning in informal contexts: advancing the field? Int J Sci Educ 29:1441–1445
Osborne J, Simon S, Collins S (2003) Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. Int J Sci Educ 25:1049–1079
Osborne J, Erduran S, Simon S (2004) Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. J Res Sci Teach 41(10):994–1020
Palmer D (2005) A motivational view of constructivist- informed teaching. Int J Sci Educ 27(15):1853–1881
Patton MQ (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd edn. Sage, Newbury Park
Quek CL, Wong AFL, Divaharan S, Liu WC, Peer J, William MD (2007) Secondary school students’ perceptions of teacher-student interaction and students’ attitudes towards project work. Learn Environ Res 10:177–187
Randle C, Hulde M (2007) Hands-on versus teacher-centre experiments in soil ecology. Res Sci Technol Educ 25(3):329–338
Roth WM (1995) Affordances of computers in teacher-student interactions: the case of Interactive Physics™. J Res Sci Teach 32:329–347
Salomon G, Perkins DN (1998) Individual and social aspects of learning. Rev Res Educ 23:1–24
Settlage J, Southerland SA, Smith L, Ceglie R (2009) Constructing a doubt-free teaching self: self-efficacy, teacher identity, and science instruction within diverse settings. J Res Sci Teach 46(1):102–125
Strauss AL (1987) Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press, New York
Wallace J, Venville G, Chou CY (2002) Cooperate is when you don’t “fight”: students’ understandings of their classroom learning environment. Learn Environ Res 5:133–153
Wellington J, Osborne J (2001) Language and literacy in science education. Open University Press, Buckingham
Wells G, Arauz RM (2006) Dialogue in the classroom. J Learn Sci 15(3):379–428
Yore LD (2003) Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. Int J Sci Educ 25(6):689–725
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ben Zvi Assaraf, O. Learning from Failure: A Case Study of Where an Extracurricular Science Program Went Wrong. J Sci Educ Technol 20, 592–607 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9327-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9327-y