Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Science and Technology Education in the STES Context in Primary Schools: What Should It Take?

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Striving for sustainability requires a paradigm shift in conceptualization, thinking, research and education, particularly concerning the science-technology-environment-society (STES) interfaces. Consequently, ‘STES literacy’ requires the development of students’ question asking, critical, evaluative system thinking, decision making and problem solving capabilities, in this context, via innovative implementable higher-order cognitive skills (HOCS)-promoting teaching, assessment and learning strategies. The corresponding paradigms shift in science and technology education, such as from algorithmic teaching to HOCS-promoting learning is unavoidable, since it reflects the social pressure, worldwide, towards more accountable socially- and environmentally-responsible sustainable development. Since most of the STES- and, recently STEM (science-technology-engineering-mathematics)-related research in science education has been focused on secondary and tertiary education, it is vital to demonstrate the relevance of this multifaceted research to the science and technology teaching in primary schools. Our longitudinal STES education-related research and curriculum development point to the very little contribution, if any, of the traditional science teaching to “know”, to the development of students’ HOCS capabilities. On the other hand, there appears to be a ‘general agreement’, that the contemporary dominant lower-order cognitive skills (LOCS) teaching and assessment strategies applied in science and technology education are, in fact, restraining the natural curiosity and creativity of primary school (and younger?) pupils/children. Since creative thinking as well as evaluative system thinking, decision making, problem solving and … transfer constitute an integral part of the HOCS conceptual framework, the appropriateness of “HOCS promoting” teaching, and the relevance of science and technology, to elementary education in the STES context, is apparent. Therefore, our overriding guiding purpose was to provide any evidence-based research to the vital LOCS-to-HOCS paradigm shift in STES education. The findings of, and conclusions derived from our longitudinal research on HOCS development within STES-oriented and traditional education, suggest that both—science and technology education (STE) and STES education—are relevant to primary school education. Based on this, what it should take to insure success in this context, is thoroughly discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AAAS (2010) Project 2061’s. Using Atlas of Science Literacy. http://www.project2061.org.atlas

  • Barak M, Ben-Chaim D, Zoller U (2007) Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skills: a case of critical thinking. Res Sci Edu 37:353–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Chaim D, Barak M, Lubezky A, Zoller U (2008) College science students’ ability to resolve chemistry problems requiring higher-order-cognitive skills. J Res Sci Teach (Submitted)

  • Brady M (2008) Cover the material—or teach students to think? Teach Stud Think 65(5):64–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunce DM (2009) Teaching is more than lecturing and learning is more than more than memorizing. J Chem Edu 86(6):674–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee R, McCrae B, Laurie R (2009) PISA 2006: an assessment of scientific literary. J Res Sci Edu 46(8):865–883

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen D, Novick R (1996) MABAT: toward scientific and technological literacy: the national primary science curriculum in Israel. In: Mioduser D, Zilberstein I (eds) The 2nd Jerusalem international science and technology education conference (JISTEC ‘96)—book of abstracts. CET, CP-19, Jerusalem

    Google Scholar 

  • Connonly P (2009) The challenges and prospects for educational effectiveness research. Effect Edu 1(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dori Y, Herskovitz O (1999) Question posing capability as an alternative evaluation method; analysis of environmental case study. J Res Sci Teach 36(4):411–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eshach H (2006) Science literacy in primary schools and pre-schools. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fensham PJ (2009) Real world contexts in PISA science: implications for context-based science education. J Res Sci Teach 46(8):884–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatt S (2000) Problem solving in primary science. Primary Sci Rev. 8–10 Jan/Feb

  • Gibbons M, Nowotny HJT (2001) The potential of transdisciplinarity. In: Thompson Klein J, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Häberli R, Bill A, Scholz RM, Welti M (eds) Transdisciplinarity: joint problem solving among science, technology, and society. An effective way for managing complexity. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 67–80

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Glaze WH (2002) Drinking water treatment with ozone. Environ Sci Technol 36(23):438A–439A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson D (2003) Time for action: science education for the alternative future. Int J Sci Edu 25:645–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson D (2004) Going beyond STS: towards a curriculum for sociopolitical action. Sci Edu Rev 3(1):2–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoolbrook J, Ranikmae M (2009) The meaning of scientific literacy. Int J Environ Sci Edu 4(3):275–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone AH (2001) Can problem solving be taught? Univ Chem Edu 5:69–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Wilson TM (2005) Teaching problem-solving skills without sacrificing course content. J College Sci Teach 35(1):42–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy Nahum T, Azaiza I, Ben-Chaim D, Herscovitz O, Zoller U (2010) Does STES-oriented science education promote 10th-grade students’ decision capability? Int J Sci Edu 32(10):1315–1336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malamitsa K, Kasoutas M, Kokkotas P (2009) Developing Greek primary school students’ critical thinking through an approach of teaching science which incorporates aspects of history of science. Sci Educ 8(3–4):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihelcic JR, Crittenden JC, Small MJ, Shonnard DR, Hokanson DR, Zhang Q, Chen H, Sorby SA, James VV, Sutherland JW, Schnoor JL (2003) Sustainability science and engineering: the emergence of a new metadiscipline. Environ Sci Technol 37:5314–5324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millar R (2006) Twenty first century science: insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science. Int J Sci Edu 28(13):1499–1521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCATE (2010) Panel says Ed. Schools overlook development science. http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2010/10/05/07develope.h30.html?tkn=SSKFEhn2HWN70yojMIFjyEuiq08s.Jh9pKZyo&cmp=clp-edweek

  • New York Times (2009) http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/30educ.html?-=1&emc=eta1

  • NSTA International Task Force (2005) Developing a worldview for science education in North America and across the globe. Final report. pp 1–9

  • Orion R, Trend D (2009) Thinking and learning in the geosciences. Geosci Edu 57(4):222–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PCAST (2009) Prepare and inspire: K-12 education in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) education for Americans’ future. Executive report. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2010/09/16/president-obama-annonce-major

  • Smith KC, Nakhleh MB, Bretz SL (2010) An expanded framework of analyzing general chemistry exams. Chem Edu Res Pract 11:147–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tal RT, Dori YJ, Keiny S, Zoller U (2001) Assessing conceptual change of teachers involved in STES education and curriculum development: the STEMS project approach. Int J Sci Edu 23(3):247–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomorrow 98 (1992) Report of the superior committee on science, mathematics and technology education in Israel–harari report. Ministry of Education (in Hebrew), Jerusalem

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardle C (2004) Asking the right questions: developing children’s questioning skills and knowing how to answer!. Primary Sci Rev 83:11–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehurst GJ, Croft M (2009) Brown center of education policy. The Brookings Institution. http://www.brokings.edu/opinions/2009/1029_standards_whitehurts.aspx

  • Yager RE (1991) The constructivist learning model: towards real reform in science education. Sci Teach 58(6):52–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager RE (1996) Science/technology/society as reform in science education. State University of New York Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoabi M, Zoller U (2010) The relevance of science and technology teaching to primary school education. The “Design Process” case in Israel. J Sci Edu Technol (submitted)

  • Zoller U (1987) The fostering of question-asking capability—a meaningful aspect of problem-solving in chemistry. J Chem Edu 64(6):510–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoller U (1990) The IEE—an STS approach. J College Sci Teach 19(5):289–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoller U (1991) Teaching/learning styles, performance and students’ teaching evaluation in STES-focused science education. A quasi-quantitative probe of a case study. J Res Sci Teach 28(7):593–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoller U (1992) Faculty teaching performance evaluation in higher science education: issues and implications (a ‘cross-cultural’ case study). Sci Edu 76(6):673–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoller U (1993) Lecture and learning: are they compatible? Maybe for LOCS; unlikely for HOCS. J Chem Edu 70(3):195–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoller U (1994) The examination where the student asks the questions. School Sci Math 94(7):347–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoller U (1996) The development of students HOCS—the key to progress in STES education. Bull Sci Technol Soci 16(5–6):268–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoller U (1998) Eshnav Le-Matas. University of Haifa, Oranim (in Hebrew)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoller U (1999) Scaling-up of higher order cognitive skill oriented college chemistry teaching: an action-oriented research. J Res Sci Teach 36(5):583–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoller U (2000a) Teaching tomorrow’s college science courses—are we getting it right? J College Sci Teach 29(6):409–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoller U (2000b) Environmental chemistry: the disciplinary/correction-transdisciplinary prevention paradigm shift. Environ Sci Pollut Res 7(2):63–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoller U (2001) The challenge for environmental chemistry educators. Environ Sci Pollut Res 8(1):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoller U (2004) From algorithmic LOCS teaching to HOCS learning paradigm shift: What does/should it take in practice-oriented research in STES education. In: Ralle B, Eilks I (eds) Proceedings of the 17th symposium on chemical education: quality in practice-oriented research in science education. Dortmund. pp 125–135

  • Zoller U, Ben-Chaim D (1997) Students’ self-assessment in HOCS science examina-tions; is there a problem? J Sci Educ Technol 7(2):135–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoller U, Levy Nahum T (2011) From teaching to ‘know’-to learning to ‘think’ in science education. The LOCS- to-HOCS paradigm shift: ‘how to do it’? In: Fraser B, Tobin K, Mcrobbie CD (eds) Handbook of science education, 2nd edn. Springer (In Press)

  • Zoller U, Pushkin D (2007) Matching higher order cognitive skills (HOCS)-promoting goal with problem-based laboratory practice in a freshman organic chemistry course. Chem Edu Res Pract 8(2):153–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoller U, Scholz RW (2004) The HOCS paradigm shift from disciplinary knowledge (LOCS) to interdisciplinary evaluative system thinking (HOCS): what should it take in science-technology-environment-society-oriented courses, curricula and assessment? Water Sci Technol 49(8):27–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoller U, Nakhleh MB, Dori J, Lubezki A, Tessier B (1995) Success on algorithmic and LOCS versus conceptual chemistry exam questions. J Chem Edu 72(11):987–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoller U, Dori Y, Lubezky A (2002) Algorithmic, LOCS and HOCS (chemistry) exam questions: performance and attitudes of college students. Int J Sci Edu 24(2):185–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Natural Sciences, Haifa University—Oranim, Kiryat Tivon, 36006, Israel

    Uri Zoller

Authors
  1. Uri Zoller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uri Zoller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zoller, U. Science and Technology Education in the STES Context in Primary Schools: What Should It Take?. J Sci Educ Technol 20, 444–453 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9306-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9306-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation