Abstract
Social network analysis (SNA) is a social science research tool that has not been applied to educational programs. This analysis is critical to documenting the changes in social capital and networks that result from community based K-12 educational collaborations. We review SNA and show an application of this technique in a school-centered, community based environmental monitoring research (CBEMR) program. This CBEMR employs K-12 students, state and local government employees, environmental organization representatives, local businesses, colleges, and community volunteers. As citizen scientists and researchers, collaborators create a database of local groundwater quality to use as a baseline for long-term environmental health management and public education. Past studies have evaluated the reliability of data generated by students acting as scientists, but there have been few studies relating to power dynamics, social capital, and resilience in school-centered CBEMR programs. We use qualitative and quantitative data gathered from a science education program conducted in five states in the northeastern United States. SPSS and NVivo data were derived from semi-structured interviews with thirty-nine participants before and after their participation in the CBEMR. Pajek software was used to determine participant centralities and power brokers within networks. Results indicate that there were statistically significant increases in social capital and resilience in social networks after participation in the school-centered CBEMR program leading to an increased community involvement in environmental health management. Limiting factors to the CBMER were based on the educator/administration relationship.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beamesa S, Atencioa M (2008) Building social capital through outdoor education. J Adventure Educ Outdoor Learn 8(2):99–112
Bennett KR, Matthews CE (2003) Motivations and teaching practices of K-12 teachers with EE certification. Paper presented at the thinking globally while acting culturally NAAEE 32nd annual conference anchorage, Alaska
Blake J (1999) Overcoming the ‘Value-Action Gap’ in environmental policy: tensions between national policy and local experience. Local Environ 4(3):257–278
Bodin O, Crona B, Ernston H (2005) Social networks in natural resource management: what is there to learn from a structural perspective? Ecol Soc 11(2):r2
Bourdieu P (1986) The forms of capital. In: Richardson JG (ed) Handbook for theory and research for sociology of education. Greenwood Press, New York
Carr AJL (2004) Why do we all need community science? Soc Nat Resour 17:841–849
Cherif AH (1992) Barriers to ecology education in North American high schools: another alternative perspective. J Environ Educ 23(3):36–46
Chi-chung Ko A, Chi-kin Lee J (2003) Teachers’ perceptions of teaching environmental issues within the science curriculum: a Hong Kong perspective. J Sci Educ Technol 12(3):187–204
Chubin D (1984) Research missions and the public: over-selling and buying the U.S. war on cancer. In: Petersen JC (ed) Citizen participation in science policy. The University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst, pp 109–129
Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am J Sociol 94(Supplement: Organizations and Institutions: Sociologica and Economic Approaches to the Analysis of Social Structure):S95–S120
Cox R (2006) Environmental communication and the public sphere. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Creswell JW (2007) Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Crona B, Bodin O (2006) What you know is who you know? Communication patterns among resource users as a prerequisite for co-management. Ecol Soc 11(2):1–23
DeGraaf D, Jordan D (2003) Social capital: how parks and recreation help to build community. Parks and Recreation
Dirks KT, Ferrin DL (2001) The role of trust in organizational settings. Oragan Sci 12:450–467
de Nooy W, Mrvar A, Batagelj V (2005) Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. Cambridge University Press, New York
Finnegan JR Jr, Sexton K (1999) Community-based environmental decisions: analyzing power and leadership. In Sexton K, Marcus AA, Easter KW, Burkhardt TD (eds) Better environmental decisions. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 331–351
Frank KA, Yasumoto JY (1998) Linking action to social structure within a system: social capital within and between subgroups. Am J Sociol 104(3):642–686
Galloway AE, Tudor MT, Vander Haegen WM (2006) The reliability of citizen science: a case study of Oregon white oak stand surveys. Wildl Soc Bull 34(5):1425–1429
Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78(6):1360–1380
Granovetter MS (1983) The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited. Sociol Theory 1:201–233
Gulati R (1995) Does familiarity breed trust? the implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Acad Manage J 38(1):85–112
Hanifan LJ (1920) The community center. Silver, Burdett & company, Boston
Janssen MA, Bodin O, Anderies JM, Elmqvist T, Ernstson H, McAllister RRJ et al. (2006) Toward a network perspective of the study of resilience in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 11(1: 15):1–20
Klaminski G, Smith EC (2004) Community education and social capital. Commun Educ J 27(3/4):1–5
Knoke D (2008) Social network analysis, vol 154, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Larson KL, Lach D (2007) Participants and non-participants of place-based groups: an assessment of attitudes and implications for public participation in water resource management. J Environ Manage 88:817–830
Lauber TB, Decker DJ, Knuth BA (2008) Social networks and community-based natural resource management. Environ Manage 42:677–687
Lawless JG, Rock BN (1998) Student scientist partnerships and data quality. J Sci Educ Technol 7(1)
Leach WD, Sabatier PA (2005) Are trust and social capital the keys to success? Watershed partnerships in California and Washington. In: Sabatier P, Focht W, Lubell M, Trachtenberg Z, Vedlitz A, Matlock M (eds) Swimming upstream: collaborative approaches to watershed management. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Leahy JE, Anderson DH (2008) Trust factors in community–water resource management agency relationships. Landscape Urban Plan 87:100–107
Lin ESY (1993) Barriers to environmental education in British Columbia. Unpublished Master of arts. The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
Lin N (2001) Social capital: a theory of social structure and action (vol 19). Cambridge University Press, New York
Mandarano LA (2009) Social network analysis of social capital in collaborative planning. Soc Nat Resour 22(3):245–260
McAllister DJ (1995) Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Acad Manage J 38(1):24–59
Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ (1997) Toward A theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manage Rev 22(4):853–886
Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad Manage Rev 23(2):242–266
Oh H, Chung M-H, Labianca G (2004) Group social capital and group effectiveness: the role of informal socializing ties. Acad Manage J 47(6):860–875
Parisi D, Taquino M, Grice SM, Gill DA (2004) Civic responsibility and the environment: linking local conditions to community environmental activeness. Soc Nat Resour 17:97–112
Penuel W, Riel M, Krause A, Frank K (2009) Analyzing teachers’ professional interactions in a school as social capital: a social network approach. Teachers College Record 111(1):124–163
Petersen JC (1984) Citizen participation in science policy. In: Petersen JC (ed) Citizen participation in science policy. The University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst, pp 1–17
Portes A (1998) Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annu Rev Sociol 24:1–24
Portes A (2000) The two meanings of social capital. Sociol Forum 15(1):1–12
Powers AL (2004) An evaluation of four place-based education programs. J Environ Educ 35(4):17–32
Prell C, Hubacek K, Reed M (2009) Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour 22:501–518
Pretty J, Ward H (2001) Social capital and the environment. World Dev 29(2):209–227
Putnam RD (1995a) Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. J Democracy 6(1):65–78
Putnam RD (1995b) Tuning in, tuning out: the strange disappearance of social capital in America. Political Sci Politics 28(4):664–683
Putnam RD (2001) Social capital: measurement and consequences. Can J Policy Res
Ramirez-Sanchez S, Pinkerton E (2009) The impact of resource scarcity on bonding and bridging social capital: the case of fishers’ information-sharing networks in Loreto, BCS, Mexico. Ecol Soc 14(1:22):1–22
Reagans R, McEvily B (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: the effects of cohesion and range. Adm Sci Q 48:240–267
Rock BN, Lauten G (1996) K-12th grade students as active contributors to research investigations. J Sci Educ Technol 5(4):255–266
Roth WM, Lee S (2004) Science education as/for participation in the community. Sci Educ 88(2):263–291
Sabatier P, Leach WD, Lubell M, Pelkey NW (2005) Theoretical frameworks explaining partnership success. In: Sabatier P, Focht W, Lubell M, Trachtenberg Z, Vedlitz A, Matlock M (eds) Swimming upstream: collaborative approaches to watershed management. MIT Press, Cambridge
Schneider M, Scholz J, Lubell M, Mindruta E, Edwardsen M (2003) Building consensual institutions: networks and the national estuary program. Am J Political Sci 47(1):143–158
Scott J (2000) Social network analysis: a handbook. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Sosu EM, McWilliam A, Gray DS (2008) The complexities of teachers’ commitment to environmental education: a mixed methods approach. J Mixed Methods Res 2(2):169–189
USEPA (2008) Drinking water in New England. From http://www.epa.gov/region01/eco/drinkwater/private_well_owners.html
Wagner CL, Fernandez-Gimenez ME (2008) Does community-based collaborative resource management increase social capital? Soc Nat Resour 21(4):324–344
Warwick-Booth L (2008) Locally directed policy and the fostering of social capital within regeneration: the case of objective 1 South Yorkshire. Soc Policy Soc 7(1):53–63
Wondolleck JM, Yaffee SL (2000) Making collaboration work: lessons from innovation in natural resource management, revised edn. Island Press, Washington, DC
Woolcock M (1998) Social capital and economic development: toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory Soc 27(2):151–208
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thornton, T., Leahy, J. Changes in Social Capital and Networks: A Study of Community-Based Environmental Management Through a School-Centered Research Program. J Sci Educ Technol 21, 167–182 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9296-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9296-1