Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 5–16 | Cite as

The Meyerhoff Way: How the Meyerhoff Scholarship Program Helps Black Students Succeed in the Sciences

  • Kathy Stolle-McAllister
  • Mariano R. Sto. Domingo
  • Amy Carrillo
Article

Abstract

The Meyerhoff Scholarship Program (MSP) is widely recognized for its comprehensive approach of integrating students into the science community. The supports provided by the program aim to develop students, primarily Blacks, into scientists by offering them academic, social, and professional opportunities to achieve their academic and career goals. The current study allowed for a rich understanding of the perceptions of current Meyerhoff students and Meyerhoff alumni about how the program works. Three groups of MSP students were included in the study: (1) new Meyerhoff students participating in Summer Bridge (n = 45), (2) currently enrolled Meyerhoff students (n = 92), and (3) graduates of the MSP who were currently enrolled in STEM graduate studies or had completed an advanced STEM degree (n = 19). Students described the importance of several key aspects of the MSP: financial support, the Summer Bridge Program, formation of Meyerhoff identity, belonging to the Meyerhoff family, and developing networks—all of which serve to integrate students both academically and socially.

Keywords

Higher education STEM Underrepresented minority Academic success Qualitative research 

References

  1. Astin AW (1993) What matters in college: four critical years revisited. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  2. Astin AW, Astin HS (1992) Undergraduate science education: the impact of different college environments on the educational pipeline in the sciences. Final report. Available at http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/13/1b/e8.pdf
  3. Barlow EL, Villarejo M (2004) Making a difference for minorities: evaluation of an educational enrichment program. J Res Sci Teach 41:861–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauer KW, Bennett JS (2003) Alumni perception used to assess undergraduate research experience. J Higher Educ 74:210–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett A, Bridglall B, Cauce A, Everson H, Gordon E, Lee C et al (2004) All students reaching the top: strategies for closing academic achievement gaps. A report of the National Study Group for the Affirmative Development of Academic Ability. North Central Regional Educational LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonsangue MV, Drew DE (1995) Increasing minority students’ success in calculus. In: Mnges RJ (Series ed), Gainen J, Willemsen EW (Vol. eds) Fostering student success in quantitative gateway courses: vol 61. New directions for teaching and learning, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, pp 23–33Google Scholar
  7. Brazziel ME, Brazziel FB (2001) Factors in decisions of underrepresented minorities to forego science and engineering doctoral study: a pilot study. J Sci Educ Technol 10:273–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bridglall BL, Gordon EW (2004) Creating excellence and increasing ethnic minority leadership in science, engineering, mathematics and technology: a study of the Meyerhoff scholars program at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. Unpublished report, AuthorsGoogle Scholar
  9. Building Engineering and Science Talent (2004) Bridge for all: higher education design principles to broaden participation in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Retrieved on 15 January 2010 from http://www.bestworkforce.org/PDFdocs/BEST_BridgeforAll_HighEdFINAL.pdf
  10. Callan P (1994) Equity in higher education: the state role. In: Justiz M, Wilson R, Bjork L (eds) Minorities in higher education. American Council on Education and Oryx Press, PhoenixGoogle Scholar
  11. Carter FD, Mandell M, Maton KI (2009). The Influence of on-campus research on STEM PhD outcomes: evidence from the Meyerhoff Scholarship Program. Educ Eval Policy An 31:441–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cole S, Barber E (2003) Increasing faculty diversity: the occupational choices of high-achieving minority students. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Committee on Science, Engineering, Public Policy (2007) Rising above the gathering storm: energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  14. Committee on Science, Engineering, Public Policy (2009) Rising above the gathering storm two years later: accelerating progress toward a brighter economic future. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  15. Corbin JA, Strauss AL (2008) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 3rd edn. Sage, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  16. Doolittle M (1997) Predicting the decision to go to graduate school among college seniors in engineering: a study at one university (Doctoral dissertation, North Carolina State University, 1996). Diss Abstr Int 57:2852Google Scholar
  17. Fries-Britt S (1998) Moving beyond Black achiever isolation: experiences of gifted black collegians. J Higher Educ 69:556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fries-Britt S (2000) Identity development of high-ability black collegians. New Dir Teach Learn 82:55–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fries-Britt S, Turner B (2002) Uneven stories: successful black collegians at a black and a white campus. Rev High Educ J Assoc Study High Educ 25:315–330Google Scholar
  20. Gandara P, Maxwell-Jolly J (1999) Priming the pump: strategies for increasing the achievement of underrepresented minority undergraduates. College Board, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Garcia P (1991) Summer bridge: improving retention rates for unprepared students. J Freshm Year Exp 3(2):91–105Google Scholar
  22. Garrison HH (1987) Undergraduate science and engineering education for Blacks and Native Americans. In: LS Dix (ed) Minorities: their underrepresentation and career differentials in science and engineering. Proceedings of a workshop. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  23. Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  24. Gordon E, Bridglall B (2005) Nurturing talent in gifted students of color. In: Sternberg RJ, Davidson EJ (eds) Conceptions of giftedness, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 120–146Google Scholar
  25. Gordon E, Bridglall B (2006) Affirmative development: cultivating academic ability. Critical issues in contemporary American education series. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, IncGoogle Scholar
  26. Grandy J (1998) Persistence in science of high-ability minority students: results of a longitudinal study. J Higher Educ 69:589–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guiffrida DA (2006) Toward a cultural advancement of Tinto’s theory. Rev High Educ 29:451–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Herndon M, Hirt J (2004) Black students and their families: what leads to success in college. J Black Stud 34(4):489–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hunter AB, Laursen SA, Seymour E (2007) Becoming a scientist: the role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal and professional development. Sci Educ 91:36–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jacobi M (1991) Focus group research: a tool for the student affairs professional. NASPA J 28:195–201Google Scholar
  31. Kaase KJ, Harshbarger DB (1993) Applying focus groups in student affairs assessment. NASPA J 30:284–289Google Scholar
  32. Koenig R (2009) U.S. higher education: minority retention rates in science are sore spot for most universities. Science 324:1386–1387Google Scholar
  33. Krueger RA, Casey MA (2009) Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research, 4th edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  34. Lincoln YS, Guba EG (1985) Naturalistic inquiry. Sage, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  35. Lopatto D (2008) Exploring the benefits of undergraduate research: the SURE survey. In: Taraban R, Blanton RL (eds) Creating effective undergraduate research programs in science. Teacher’s College Press, New York, pp 112–132Google Scholar
  36. Maton KI, Hrabowski FA III (2004) Increasing the number of African American PhDs in the sciences and engineering: a strengths-based approach. Am Psychol 59:547–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maton KI, Hrabowski FA III, Schmitt CL (2000) African American college students excelling in the sciences: college and post-college outcomes in the Meyerhoff Scholars Program. J Res Sci Teach 37:629–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Maton KI, Sto. Domingo MR, Stolle-McAllister KE, Zimmerman JL, Hrabowski FA III (2009) Enhancing the number of African Americans who pursue STEM PhDs: Meyerhoff Scholarship Program outcomes, processes, and individual predictors. J Women Minor Sci Eng 15:15–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. May GS, Chubin DE (2003) A retrospective on undergraduate engineering success for underrepresented minority students. J Eng Educ 1–13Google Scholar
  40. Merriam SB (1998) Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  41. Morgan DL (1997) Focus groups as qualitative research, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  42. National Science Board (2008a) Freshmen intending S&E major, by sex, race/ethnicity, and field: selected years, 1985–2006. Science and Engineering Indicators 2008. Retrieved 22 July 2008 from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind08/append/c2/at02-15.pdf
  43. National Science Board (2008b) Science and engineering indicators, 2008. Two volumes. National Science Foundation, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  44. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (2009) Science and engineering degrees, by race/ethnicity of recipients: 1997–2006. Detailed statistical tables NSF 10-300. Arlington, VA, Mark K. Fienegen, project officer. Available at http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf10300/
  45. Nettles MT (1991) Racial similarities and differences in the predictors of college student achievement. In: Allen WR, Epps E, Haniff NZ (eds) College in Black and White. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp 75–91Google Scholar
  46. Newman J (1998) Rapprochement among undergraduate psychology, science, mathematics, engineering, and technology education. Am Psychol 53(9):1032–1043. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pascarella ET, Terenzini PT (1986) Orientation to college and freshman year persistence/withdrawal. J Higher Educ 57(2):155–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Seymour E, Hewitt NM (1997) Talking about leaving: why undergraduates leave the sciences. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  49. Springer L, Stanne ME, Donovan SS (1999) Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: a meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res 69:21–51Google Scholar
  50. Steele CM (1997) A threat in the air: how stereotypes shape the intellectual identities and performance of women and African-Americans. Am Psychol 52:613–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Summers MF, Hrabowski FAIII (2006) Preparing minority scientists and engineers. Science 311:1870–1871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Taylor SJ, Bogdan R (1998) Introduction to qualitative research methods: a guidebook and resource, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. Terenzini PT, Rendon LI, Upcraft ML, Millar SB, Allison KW, Gregg PL, Jalomo R (1994) The transition to college: diverse students, diverse stories. Res High Educ 35:57–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tinto V (1993) Leaving college: rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  55. Treisman PU (1983) Improving the performance of minority students in college-level mathematics. Innovation Abstracts, 5. Retrieved on 1 April 2010 from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/31/ec/d8.pdf
  56. Treisman U (1990) Studying students studying calculus: a look at the lives of minority mathematics students in college. Coll Math J 23:362–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tsui L (2007) Effective strategies to increase diversity in STEM fields: a review of the research literature. J Negro Educ 76:555–581Google Scholar
  58. van Langen A, Dekkers H (2005) Cross-national differences in participating in tertiary science, technology, engineering and mathematics education. Comp Educ 41(3):329–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Walpole MB, Simmerman H, Mack C, Mills JT, Scales M, Albano D (2008) Bridge to success: insight into summer bridge program students’ college transition. J First Year Exp Stud Transit 20(1):11–30Google Scholar
  60. Wilson R (2000) Barriers to minority success in college science, mathematics, and engineering programs. In: Campbell G, Denes R, Morrison C (eds) Access denied: race, ethnicity, and the scientific enterprise. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 193–206Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathy Stolle-McAllister
    • 1
  • Mariano R. Sto. Domingo
    • 1
  • Amy Carrillo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore CountyBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations