Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Genetically Modified Food: Knowledge and Attitude of Teachers and Students

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concepts behind the technology of genetic modification of organisms and its applications are complex. A diverse range of opinions, public concern and considerable media interest accompanies the subject. This study explores the knowledge and attitudes of science teachers and senior secondary biology students about the application of a rapidly expanding technology, genetic engineering, to food production. The results indicated significant difference in understanding of concepts related with genetically engineered food stuffs between teachers and students. The most common ideas about genetically modified food were that cross bred plants and genetically modified plants are not same, GM organisms are produced by inserting a foreign gene into a plant or animal and are high yielding. More teachers thought that genetically engineered food stuffs were unsafe for the environment. Both teachers and students showed number of misconceptions, for example, the pesticidal proteins produced by GM organisms have indirect effects through bioaccumulation, induces production of allergic proteins, genetic engineering is production of new genes, GM plants are leaky sieves and that transgenes are more likely to introgress into wild species than mutated species. In general, more students saw benefits while teachers were cautious about the advantages of genetically engineered food stuffs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dawson V (2007) An exploration of high school (12–17 year old) students’ understandings of, and attitudes towards biotechnology processes. Res Sci Edu 37(1):59–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson V, Schibeci R (2003) Western Australian school students’ understanding of biotechnology. Int J Sci Edu 25:57–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson V, Taylor PC (2000) Do adolescents’ bioethical decisions differ from those of experts? J Biol Edu 34:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus A, Roth Z (1986) The consistency of the opinions of 12th grade biology pupils on the desirability of biotechnologies. Res Sci Technol Edu 4:139–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk MC, Chassy BM, Harlander SK, Hoban TJ, McGloughlin MN, Akhlaghi AR (2002) Food biotechnology: benefits and concerns. Am soc Nutrition Sci 132(6):1384–1390

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher KM (1992) Improving high school genetics instruction. In teaching genetics: recommendations and research proceedings of a national conference, eds. Smith MU and Simmons PE pp 24–28. Cambridge

  • Frewer LJ, Shepherd R, Sparkes P (1994) Biotechnology and food production–knowledge and perceived risk. Brit Food J 96:26–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frewer LJ, Hedderley D, Howard C, Shepherd R (1997) ‘Objection’ mapping in determining age group and individual concerns regarding genetic engineering. Agric Hum Values 14:67–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz S, Husmann D, Wingenbach G, Rutherford T, Egger V, Wadhwa P (2002) Awareness and acceptance of biotechnology issues among youth, undergraduates and adults. J Agrobiotechnol Manag Econ 6 (4), article 5

    Google Scholar 

  • Garton GL (1992) Teaching genetics in the high school classroom. In teaching genetics: recommendations and research proceedings of a national conference, eds. Smith MU and Simmons PE pp 20–23. Cambridge

  • Hallman WK (1996) Public perceptions of biotechnology: another look. BIO/TECHNOLOGY 14:35–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill R, Stanisstreet M, Boyes E, Sullivan O (1998) Reactions to a new technology: students’ ideas about genetically engineered foodstuffs. Res Sci Technol Edu 16(2):203–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoban TJ (1997) Consumer acceptance of biotechnology: an international perspective, nature biotechnology. Nat Biotechnol 15:232–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoban TJ, Kendall PA (1992) Consumer attitudes about the use of biotechnology in agriculture and food production. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdredge C, Talbott S (2001) Sowing technology: the ecological argument against genetic engineering down on the farm. Sierra: the magazine of the Sierra Club, 24–72

  • Jenkins EW (1999) School science, citizenship and the public understanding of science. Int J Sci Edu 21:703–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalaitzandonakes N, Marks LA, Vickner SS (2005) Sentiments and acts towards genetically modified foods. Int J biotechnol 7(1–3):161–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kindfield ACH (1992) Teaching genetics: recommendations and research. In teaching genetics: recommendations and research proceedings of a national conference, eds. Smith MU and Simmons PE pp 39–43. Cambridge

  • Kirkpatrick G, Orvis K, Pittendrigh B (2002) A teaching model for biotechnology and genomics education. J Biol Edu 37(1):31–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis J, Wood-Robinson C (2000) Genes, chromosomes, cell division and inheritance-do students see any relationship? Int J Sci Edu 22:177–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lock R, Miles C (1993) Biotechnology and genetic engineering: students; knowledge and attitudes. J Biol Edu 27:267–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock R, Miles D, Hughes S (1995) The influence of teaching on knowledge and attitudes in biotechnology and genetic engineering contexts: implications for teaching controversial issues and the public understating of science. School Sci Rev 76:47–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Losey J, Raylor R, Carter M (1999) Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae. Nature 399:214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macer D (1994) Bioethical reasoning of students in Singapore and Hong Kong Bioethics for the people by the people. Ethics Institute, 165–169

  • Magnusson MK, Hursti UK (2002) Consumer attitudes towards genetically modified foods. Appetite 39(1):9–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marbach-Ad (2001) Attempting to break the code in student comprehension of genetic concepts. J Biol Edu 35(4):183–189

  • Marchant R, Marchant EM (1999) G M plants: concepts and issues. J Biol Edu 34:5–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlier E (1992) Euro barometer 351-: opinions of Europeans on biotechnology in 1991. In: Durant J (ed) Biotechnology in public: a review of recent research. Science Museum Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar R (1996) Towards a science curriculum for public understanding. School Sci Rev 77:7–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Popli R (1999) Scientific literacy for all citizens: difference concepts and contents. Public Understand Sci 8:123–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quan L, Curtis KR, McCluskey J, Wahl TI (2002) Consumer attitudes towards genetically modified foods. J Agro Biotechnol Manag Econ 5(4):145–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Saher M, Lindeman M, Hursti UK (2006) Attitude towards genetically modified and organic foods. Appetite 46(3):324–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanbonmatsu D, Fazio R (1990) The role of attitudes in memory-based decision making. J Pers Soc Psychol 59(4):614–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seethaler S, Linn M (2004) Genetically modified food in perspective: an inquiry based curriculum to help middle school students make sense of trade offs. Int J Sci Edu 26(14):1765–1785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon J, Thomas J (1990) Science education for the public understanding of science. Stud Sci Edu 33:61–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart BJ (1987) Genetics in relation to biology. School Sci Rev 68:645–653

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart JH, Van Kirk J (1990) Understanding and problem solving in classical genetics. Int J Sci Edu 12:575–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tada Y, Nakase M, Adachi T, Nakamura R, Shimoda H, Takahashi M, Fujimura T, Matsuda T (1996) Reduction of 14–16 kDa allergenic proteins in transgenic rice plants by antisense gene. FEBS Lett 391:341–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thayer A (1999) Transformic agriculture: transgenic crops and the application of discovery technologies are altering the agrochemical and agricultural business. Chemical and Engineering News, 19 April, 21–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson M (1996) Can the risk from transgenic crop plants be estimated? Tibtech 14:449–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfenbarger L, Phifer P (2000) The ecological risks and benefits of genetically engineered plants. Science 290:2088–2093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye X, Al-Babali S, Kloti A, Zhang J, Lucca P, Beyer P, Potrykus I (2000) Engineering the provitamin- A (β-carotene) biosynthetic pathway into (carotenoid free) rice endosperm. Science 287(5451):303–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon C (1999) Stalked by deadly virus, papaya leaves to breed again. The New York Timer, 20 July

  • Zechendedorf B (1994) What the public think about biotechnology. BIO/TECHNOLOGY 12:871–875

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Prof. V. G. Jadhao, Principal and Prof. K.B. Rath, Dean of Instruction, Regional Institute of Education (NCERT) for their valuable comments and encouragement. We also thank Principals of various schools for their kind cooperation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Regional Institute of Education (NCERT), Bhubaneswar, Orissa, 751022, India

    Animesh K. Mohapatra, Deepika Priyadarshini & Antara Biswas

Authors
  1. Animesh K. Mohapatra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Deepika Priyadarshini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Antara Biswas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Animesh K. Mohapatra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mohapatra, A.K., Priyadarshini, D. & Biswas, A. Genetically Modified Food: Knowledge and Attitude of Teachers and Students. J Sci Educ Technol 19, 489–497 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9215-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9215-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation