Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Cross-Grade Comparison of Students’ Understanding of Energy Concepts

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aims of this cross-grade study were (1) to determine the level of understanding of energy concepts of students at different academic grades and the differences in understanding between these grades and (2) to analyse the conceptual development of these students. Two hundred and forty-three students at 3 different levels (high school, undergraduate, and postgraduate) participated in this study. The students’ understandings of energy concepts were determined using a questionnaire, which requested them to define the concept verbally, and to represent it graphically. The most important findings of this study may be summarised as follows. Students from the different groups generally succeeded in defining ‘energy’ in a similar way, namely as the ‘ability to do work’. Nevertheless, some students (including those at university) also provided different alternative conceptions related to the energy concept. In addition, some students also found difficulty in visually analysing the relationships between different variables using graphs. This finding could help explain why attainment levels of all groups falls short in questions that involve the graphical representation of data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham MR, Williamson VM, Wetsbrook SL (1994) A cross-age study of the understanding of five chemistry concepts. J Res Sci Teach 31(2):147–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arcavi A (2003) The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educ Stud Math 52(3):215–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop AJ (1980) Spatial abilities and mathematics education: a review. Educ Stud Math 11(3):257–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyes E, Stanisstreet M (1990) Pupils’ ideas concerning energy sources. Int Sci Educ 12(5):513–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brook AJ, Wells P (1988) Conserving the circus? An alternative approach to teaching and learning about energy. Phys Educ 23(2):80–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui Thi KH (2005) Une étude didactique de la vie de l’energie dans l’enseignement de la Physique, en France et au Vietnam: Des décalages entre savoirs à enseigner au Lycée et savoirs de la formation universitaire, peuvent-ils être source de difficultés pour les enseignants? Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France

  • Çalık M, Ayas A (2005) A comparison of level of understanding of grade 8 students and science student teachers related to selected chemistry concepts. J Res Sci Teach 42(6):638–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevallard Y (1989) Le concept de rapport au savoir. Rapport personnel, rapport institutionnel, rapport officiel. Actes du séminaire de Didactique des Mathématiques et de l’Informatique année 1988-1989, LSD-IMAG, Grenoble, 211–236

  • Diakidoy IAN, Kendeou P, Ioannides C (2003) Reading about energy: the effects of text structure in science learning and conceptual change. Contemp Educ Psychol 28(3):335–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitriadis P, Kabouris K, Karanikas J, Papamichalis K, Papatsimba L, Kalkanis G (1999) Linear motion study through graphs a new technology-based learning environnement. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference of the European Science Education Research, Kiel 31 August–4 September, 36–38

  • Domenech JL, Gil-perez D, Gras-marti A, Guisasola J, Torregrosa JM, Salinas J, Trumper R, Valdes P, Vilches A (2007) Teaching of energy issues: a debate proposal for a global reorientation. Sci Educ 16(1):43–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus T (1991) On the status of visual reasoning in mathematics and mathematics education. In: Furinghetti F (ed) Proceedings of the 15th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Universita de Genova, Genova, pp 33–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Duit R (1984) Learning to the energy concept in school—empirical results from the Philippines and West Germany. Phys Educ 19(2):59–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duit R (1987) Should energy be illustrated as something quasi-material? Int J Sci Educ 9(2):139–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duval R (1993) Registres de représentation sémiotique et fonctionnement cognitif de la pensée. Annales de Didactique et de Sciences Cognitives- IREM de Strasbourg 5:37–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Duval R (1995) Sémiosis et pensée humaine. Registres sémiotiques et apprentissages intellectuels. Peter Lang, Berne

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkana Y (1974) The discovery of the conservation of the energy. Hutchinson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Even R (1998) Factors involved in linking representations of functions. J Math Behav 17(1):105–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry M, Dimeo L, Wilson C, Sadler J, Fawns R (2003) A new approach to teaching ‘energy and change’: using an abstract picture language to teach thermodynamic thinking in junior science classes. Aust Sci Teach J 49(1):36–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldring H, Osborne J (1994) Students’ difficulties with energy and related concepts. Phys Educ 29(1):26–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gürdal A, Şahin F, Bayram H (1999) İlköğretim öğretmen adaylarının enerji konusunda bütünlüğü sağlama ve ilişki kurma düzeyleri üzerine bir araştırma. Dokuz Eylül University. J Buca Fac Educ 10:382–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidar HA, Abraham MR (1991) A comparison of applied and theoretical knowledge of concept based on the particulate nature of matter. J Res Sci Teach 28(10):919–938

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuvelen AV, Zou X (2001) Multiple representations of work-energy processes. Am J Phys 69(2):184–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert J, Carpenter T (1992) Learning and teaching with understanding. In: Grouws DA (ed) Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Macmillan, New York, pp 65–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Hırça N, Çalık M, Akdeniz F (2008) Investigating grade 8 students’ conceptions of ‘energy’ and related concepts. J Turk Sci Educ 5(1):75–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt F (1998) Difficulties in the articulation of different representations linked to the concept of function. J Math Behav 17(1):123–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt F (2002) Representations and mathematics visualization. Cinvestav-IPN, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Huis C, Berg E (1993) Teaching energy: a systems approach. Phys Educ 28(3):147–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaper WH, Goedhart MJ (2002) Forms of energy, an intermediary language on the road to thermodynamics? Part I. Int J Sci Educ 24(1):81–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp HR (1984) The concept of energy without heat or work. Phys Educ 19(5):234–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köse S, Bağ H, Sürücü A, Uçak E (2006) Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının canlılardaki enerji kaynaklarıyla ilgili görüşleri. Int J Envir Sci Educ 1(2):141–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger C, Palacio D, Summers M (1992) Surveys of English primary school teachers’ conceptions of force, energy and materials. Sci Educ 76(4):339–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Küçük M, Çepni S, Gökdere M (2005) Turkish primary school students’ alternative conceptions about work, power and energy. J Phys Teach Educ 3(2):22–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurnaz MA (2007) Üniversite 1. sınıf seviyesinde enerji kavramının öğrenim durumlarının analizi. Unpublished master’s dissertation, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey

  • Kurnaz MA, Saglam Arslan A (2009) Using the anthropological theory of didactics in physics: characterization of the teaching conditions of energy concept and the personal relations of freshmen to this concept. J Turk Sci Educ 6(1):72–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemmer M, Lemmer TN (2006) The role and place of energy in the physics curriculum. Paper presented at the GIREP 2006 conference: Modeling in Physics and Phys Educ, 20–25 Aug 2006, Amsterdam

  • Meltzer DE (2004) Investigation of students’ reasoning regarding heat, work, and the first law of thermodynamics in an introductory calculus-based general physics course. Am J Phys 72(11):1432–1446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgil I, Yoruk N (2006) Cross age study of the understanding of some concepts in chemistry subjects in science curriculum. J Turk Sci Educ 3(1):15–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls G, Ogborn J (1993) Dimensions of children’s conceptions of energy. Int J Sci Educ 15(1):73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadouris N, Constantinou CP (2006) Design, development and validation of a teaching proposal for energy: results from a pilot implementation. Paper presented at the GIREP 2006 conference: Modeling in Physics and Phys Educ, 20–25 August 2006, Amsterdam

  • Papadouris N, Constantinou CP, Kyratsi T (2008) Students’ use of the energy model to account for changes in physical systems. J Res Sci Teach 45(4):444–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pell T, Jarvis T (2001) Developing attitude to science scales for use with children of ages from five to eleven years. Int J Sci Educ 23(8):847–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piez CM, Voxman MH (1997) Multiple representations-using different perspectives to form a clearer picture. Math Teach 90(2):164–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Presmeg NC (2006) Research on visualization in learning and teaching mathematics. In: Gutiérrez A, Boero P (eds) Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past present and future. Sense, Rotterdam, pp 205–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands S, Graham T, Berry J, McWilliams P (2007) Conceptual change through the lens of Newtonian mechanics. Sci Educ 16(1):21–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saka A, Cerrah L, Akdeniz AR, Ayas A (2006) A cross-age study of the understanding of three genetic concepts: how do they image the gene, DNA and chromosome? J Sci Educ Technol 15(2):192–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sefton I (2004) Understanding energy. In: Proceedings of 11th biennial science teachers’ Workshop, 17–18 June 2004, University of Sydney

  • Séjourné A, Tiberghien A (2001) Conception d’un hypermédia en physique et études des activités des élèves du point de vue de l’apprentissage. Actes du Cinquième Colloque Hypermédias et Apprentissages, Grenoble

    Google Scholar 

  • Tairab HH, Al-Naqbi AK (2004) How do secondary school science students interpret and construct scientific graphs? J Biol Educ 38(3):127–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigueros M, Martínez-Planell R (2009) Geometrical representations in the learning of two-variable functions. Educ Stud Math, Published online 24 June 2009

  • Trowbridge JE, Mintzes JJ (1988) Alternative conceptions in animal classification: a cross-age study. J Res Sci Teach 25(7):547–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trumper R (1990) Being constructive: an alternative approach to the teaching of the energy concept, part one. Int J Sci Educ 12(4):343–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trumper R (1991) Being constructive: an alternative approach to the teaching of the energy concept, part two. Int J Sci Educ 13(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trumper R (1998) A longitudinal study of physics students’ conceptions on energy in pre-service training for high school teachers. J Sci Educ Technol 7(4):311–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trumper R, Gorsky P (1993) Learning about energy: the influence of alternative frameworks, cognitive levels, and closed-mindedness. J Res Sci Teach 30(7):637–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ünal Çoban G, Aktamış H, Ergin Ö (2007) İlköğretim 8. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Enerjiyle İlgili Görüşleri. Gazi University. J Kastamonu Fac Educ 15(1):175–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Berg E, Van Den Berg R, Capistrano N, Sicam A (2000) Kinematics graphs and instant feedback. Sch Sci Rev 82:104–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren JW (1982) The nature of energy. Eur J Sci Educ 4(3):295–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren JW (1983) Energy and its carriers: a critical analysis. Phys Educ 18(5):209–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts DM (1983) Some alternative views on energy. Phys Educ 18(5):213–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook SL, Marek EA (1992) A cross-age study of student understanding of the concept of homeostasis. J Res Sci Teach 29(1):51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fatih Faculty of Education, Department of Secondary Science and Mathematics Education, Karadeniz Technical University, 61335, Sogutlu, Trabzon, Turkey

    Aysegul Saglam-Arslan

Authors
  1. Aysegul Saglam-Arslan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aysegul Saglam-Arslan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saglam-Arslan, A. Cross-Grade Comparison of Students’ Understanding of Energy Concepts. J Sci Educ Technol 19, 303–313 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9201-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9201-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation