Skip to main content
Log in

Building a Common Platform on Students’ Participation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article sets out to examine how school science activities can encourage students’ participation while supporting a specific science content. One ordinary class with 12-year-old students was chosen and their regular classroom work was studied without intervention and with a minimum of interference. Lessons were video filmed, transcribed and analyzed focussing on the participants’ speech acts. It was found that students’ initiatives and experiences were important parts of their participation. The results show how students’ participation was orchestrated with a science content by means of four different kinds of activities. The activities are called ‘individual inventory of experiences’, ‘building a common platform of experiences’, ‘sharing new experiences’ and ‘concluding a common platform’. The activities form a foundation for participation in human biology topics. For example, to ‘build a common platform of experiences’ seems to level out students’ different prerequisites for participating in subsequent tasks. Furthermore, to ‘conclude a common platform’ implied a checkpoint of the shared new experiences. The activities support students’ tentative use of scientific words as well as their learning of what counts as knowledge in the school science setting. However, it can be questioned if the time spent on each separate activity is necessary or if similar achievements could be made even if some activities were integrated. The question is open for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The following markings were used when transcribing: (.) = short break; (2 s.) = 2 seconds break; = = following turn comes without break; : = prolonged sound; ( ) [single parenthesis] = said with silent voice/difficult to hear; (( )) [double parenthesis] = my comment; ____ [underline] = with emphasis. The numbers that can be found in the end of each transcripts shows the number of the recording and the elapsed time.

References

  • Bergqvist K, Säljö R (2004) Learning to plan. In: Van der Linden J, Renshaw P (eds) Dialogic learning. Shifting perspectives to learning, instruction, and teaching. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 109–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig M, Condor S, Edwards D, Gane M, Middleton D, Radley A (1988) Ideological dilemmas. SAGE, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Çalik M, Alipasa A, Coll RK (2006a) A constructivist-based model for the teaching of dissolution of gas in a liquid. Asia-Pac Forum Sci Learn Teach 7(1):1

    Google Scholar 

  • Çalik M, Ayas A, Coll RK, Ünal S, Coştu B (2006b) Investigating the effectiveness of a constructivist-based teaching model on student understanding of the dissolution of gases in liquids. J Sci Educ Technol. Retrieved 14 March 2007 from http://www.springerlink.com/content/18p1v4t96025m531

  • Carlgren I (1994) Från klassundervisning till »eget arbete«. Praxis 2:9–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J (1910/1997) How we think. Dover, New York

  • Dewey J (1913/1975) Interest and effort in education. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale

  • Dewey J (1938/1998) Experience and education. Kappa Delta Pi, West Lafayette

  • Driver R (1983) The student as scientist? Open University Press, Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Khishfe R, Abd-El-Khalick F (2002) Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. J Res Sci Teach 39(7):551–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundin M, Lindahl M (2005) Experiences and their role in science education. J Baltic Sci Educ 1(7):31–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer N (1995) The guided construction of knowledge. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar R (1989) Bending the evidence: the relationship between theory and experiment in science education. In: Millar R (ed) Doing science: images of science in science education. Falmer, London, pp 38–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogborn J, Kress G, Martins I, McGillicuddy K (1996) Explaining science in the classroom. Open University Press, Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Östman L (2003) Transaktion, sociokulturella praktiker och meningsskapande: ett forskningsprogram. In: Östman L (ed) Erfarenhet och situation i handling. Pedagogisk forskning 147. Uppsala universitet, Uppsala, pp 91–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiefele U (1991) Interest, learning and motivation. Educ Psychol 26(3–4):299–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton C (1996) Beliefs about science and beliefs about language. Int J Sci Educ 18(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szybek P (2002) Science education – an event staged on two stages simultaneously. Sci & Educ 11:525–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utbildningsdepartementet (1994) Läroplaner för det obligatoriska skolväsendet. Retrieved 8 March 2006 from http://www.skolverket.se/skolfs?id=258

  • Wittgenstein L (1953) Philosophical investigations. Blackwell, Malden

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mattias Lundin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lundin, M. Building a Common Platform on Students’ Participation. J Sci Educ Technol 16, 369–377 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-007-9063-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-007-9063-5

Keywords

Navigation