Abstract
This study investigated the effectiveness of combining conceptual change text and discussion web strategies on students' understanding of photosynthesis and respiration in plants. Students' conceptual understanding of photosynthesis and respiration in plants was measured using the two-tier diagnostic test developed by Haslam and Treagust (1987, Journal of Biological Education 21: 203--211). The test was administered as pretest and posttest to a total of 233 eighth-grade students in six intact classes of the same school located in an urban area. The test of logical thinking was used to determine the reasoning ability of students. The experimental group was a class of 116 students received discussion web and conceptual change text instruction. A class of 117 students comprised the control group received a traditional instruction. After instruction, data were analyzed with two-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) using the Test of Logical Thinking and pretest scores as covariate. The conceptual change instruction, which explicitly dealt with students' misconceptions, produced significantly greater achievement in understanding of photosynthesis and respiration in plant concepts. Analysis also revealed a significant difference between performance of females and that of males in the favor of females, but the interaction of treatment with gender difference was not significant for learning the concepts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnaudin, M. W., and Mintzes, J. J. (1985). Students’ alternative conceptions of the human circulatory system: A cross age study. Science Education 69: 721–733.
Alvermann, D. E. (1991). The discussion web: A graphic aid for learning across the curriculum. The Reading Teacher 45: 92–99.
Alvermann, D. E., and Hague, A. S.(1989). Effects of prior knowledge activation models and text structure on nonmajors’ comprehension on physics. Journal of Educational Research 83: 97–102.
Anderson, C. W., Sheldon, T. H., and Dubay, J. (1990) The effects of instruction on college nonmajors’ conceptions of respiration and photosynthesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27: 761–776.
Bell, B. (1985). Students’ ideas about plant nutrition: what are they? Journal of Biological Education 19: 213–218.
BouJaude, S., Salloum, S., and Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2004). Relationships between selective cognitive variables and students’ ability to solve chemistry problems. International Journal of Science Education 26: 63–84.
Chambers, S. K., and Andre, T. (1997) Gender, prior knowledge, interest, and experience in electricity and conceptual change text manipulations in learning about direct current. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34: 107–123.
Diakidoy, I. N., Kendeou, P., and Ioannides, C. (2003). Reading about energy: The effects of text structure in science learning and conceptual change. Contemporary Educational Psychology 28: 335–356.
Driver, R., and Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education 5: 61–84.
Eisen, Y., and Stavy, R. (1988). Students’ understanding of photosynthesis. The American Biology Teacher 50: 209–212.
Fisher, K. M. (1985). A misconception in biology: Amino acids and translation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 22: 63–72.
Gilbert, J. K., Osborne, R. J., and Fenshman, P. J. (1982). Children’s science and its consequences for teaching. Science Education 66: 623–633.
Gunstone, R. F., Champagne, A. B., and Klopfer, L. E. (1981) Instruction for understanding: A case study. Australian Science Teachers Journal 27: 27–32.
Guzzetti, B. J. (2000). Learning counter-intuitive science concepts: what have we learned from over a decade of research? Reading and Writing Quarterly 16: 89–98.
Haslam, F., and Treagust, D. F. (1987). Diagnosing secondary students’ misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier multiple choice instrument. Journal of Biological Education 21: 203–211.
Hynd, C. R. (2001). Refutational texts and the change process. International Journal of Educational Research 35: 699–714.
Hynd, C. R., Alvermann, D. E., and Qian, G. (1997). Preservice elementary school teachers’ conceptual change about projectile motion: Refutation text, demonstration, affective factors, and relevance. Science Education 81: 1–27.
Hynd, C. R., McWhorter, J. Y., Phares, V. L., and Suttles, C. W. (1994). The role of instruction in conceptual change in high school physics topics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 31: 933–946.
Johnson, M. A., and Lawson, A. E. (1998). What are the relative effects of reasoning ability and prior knowledge on biology achievement in expository and inquiry classes? Journal of Research in Science Teaching 35: 89–103.
Kang, S., Scharmann, L. C., and Noh, T. (2004). Reexamining the role of cognitive conflict in science concept learning. Research in Science Education 34: 71–96.
Musheno, B. V., and Lawson, A. E. (1999). Effects of learning cycle and traditional text on comprehension of science concepts by students at differing reasoning levels. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36: 23–37.
Mikkila, E. (2001). Improving conceptual change concerning photosynthesis through text design. Learning and Instruction 11: 241–257.
Palmer, D. H. (2003). Investigating the relationship between refutational text and conceptual change. Science Education 87: 663–684.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., and Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education 66: 211–227.
Sanders, M. (1993). Erroneous ideas about respiration: the teacher factor. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30: 919–934.
Seymour, J., and Longden, B. (1991). Respiration-that’s breathing isn’t it? Journal of Biological Education 23: 77–184.
Smith, L. E., Blakessie, T. D., and Anderson, C. W. (1993). Teaching strategies associated with conceptual change in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30: 111–126.
Tobin, K. G., and Capie, W. (1981). The development ad validation of a group test of logical thinking. Educational and Psychological Measurement 41: 413–423.
Vosniadou, S., Ioannides, C., Dimitrakopoulou, A., and Papademetriou, E. (2001). Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science. Learning and Instruction 11: 381–419.
Wandersee, J. E., Mintzes, J. J., and Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In Gabel, D. L. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, MacMillan, New York, pp. 177–210.
Wang, T., and Andre, T. (1991). Conceptual change text versus traditional text and application questions versus no questions in learning about electricity. Contemporary Educational Psychology 16: 103–116.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yenilmez, A., Tekkaya, C. Enhancing Students' Understanding of Photosynthesis and Respiration in Plant Through Conceptual Change Approach. J Sci Educ Technol 15, 81–87 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-0358-8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-0358-8