Abstract
This paper begins by examining the profound impact of energy usage on our lives, and on every major sector of the economy. Then, the anticipated US energy needs by the year 2025 are presented based on the Department of Energy’s projections. The paper considers the much-touted National Energy Policy Report, and identifies a major flaw where the policy report neglects education as a contributor to solving future energy problems. The inextricable interaction between energy solutions and education is described, with emphasis on education policy as a potential vehicle for developing economically and commercially sustainable energy systems that have a minimal impact on the environment. With that said, an earnest argument is made as to the need to educate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) proficient individuals for the energy technology development workforce, starting with the K-12 level. A framework for the aforementioned STEM education policies is presented that includes a sustained national awareness campaign, address the teacher’s salary issues, and addresses teacher quality issues. Moreover, the framework suggests a John Dewey-style “learning-by-doing” shift in pedagogy. Finally, the framework presents specific changes to the current national standards that would be valuable to the 21st century student.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO (2002). Survey and Analysis of Teacher Salary Trends. American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO, Washington, DC. Website: http://www.aft.org/research/survey02/SalarySurvey02.pdf
Dewey, J. (1991). How We Think, Prometheus Books, New York.
Dewey, J. (1997). Experience and Education, ed. reprint, Free Press, New York.
Ellis, A. J. (1977). Chemistry and Geothermal Systems, Academic Press, New York.
Fonash, S. J. (1981). Solar Cell Device Physics, Academic Press, New York.
Gipe, P. (1995). Wind Energy Comes of Age, Wiley, New York.
Gulliver, J., and Arndt, R. (1990). Hydropower Engineering Handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Kenney, W. F. (1984). Energy Conservation in the Process Industries, Academic Press, Orlando.
Larminie, J., and Dicks, A. (2003). Fuel Cell Systems Explained, ed. 2, Wiley.
Larry, L. A., and Tillman, D. A. (Eds.) (1977). Fuels from Waste, Academic Press, New York.
National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983). A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform, GPO, Washington, DC.
National Association of State Boards of Education (October 2002). State incentive programs for recruiting teachers: Are they effective in reducing shortages. Issues in Brief, NASBE, Alexandria, VA.
National Science Board 2004. Science and Engineering Indicators 2004. Website: http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/nsb0407/start.htm
Podgursky, M., Monroe, R., and Watson, D. (2002). Teacher Mobility, Pay, and Academic Quality. Presented at Society of Labor Economists Annual Meetings, Baltimore, MD, May 3–4, 2002. Website: http://gsbwww.uchicago.edu/labor/podgursky.pdf
Sanders, W., and Rivers, J. (1996). Cumulative and Residual Effects of Teachers on Future Student Academic Achievement, University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center, Knoxville, TN, 1996.
Sarensen, B. (1979). Renewable Energy, Academic Press, London, New York, 1979.
Seastrom, et al. (1987). Qualifications of the public school teacher workforce: Prevalence of out-of-field teaching 1987–88 to 1999–2000. Education Statistics Quarterly 4. Website: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/quarterly/vol_4/4_3/2_2.asp
The National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21 Century (2000). Before It’s Too Late, GPO, Washington, DC, September 2000, p. 12. Website: http://www.ed.gov/inits/Math/glenn/report.pdf
The Education Trust Inc. (1999). Not good enough: A content analysis of teacher licensing examinations. Thinking-K16 3. Website: http://www2.edtrust.org/NR/rdonlyres/5F7B8FCA-2400-47DE-9C40-AC948D934836/0/k16_spring99.pdf
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (2001). The Nation’s Report Card: Mathematics 2000, GPO, Washington, DC, pp. 58–68.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (2002). The Condition of Education 2002, GPO, Washington, DC, p. 138. Website: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/2002025.pdf
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Policy and Planning (September 1992). International Education Comparisons, GPO, Washington, DC, pp. 22–23.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Under Secretary, Planning and Evaluation Service (1997). White Paper. Mathematics Equals Opportunity, GPO, Washington, DC, p. 6. Website: http://www.ed.gov/pubs/math/index.html
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (2000). Occupational Outlook Handbook, ed. 2002–2003, GPO, Washington, DC. Table 3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chedid, L.G. Energy, Society, and Education, with Emphasis on Educational Technology Policy for K-12. J Sci Educ Technol 14, 75–85 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-005-2735-0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-005-2735-0