Abstract
This paper presents an innovative approach to introducing pre-service early childhood teachers to math, science and technology education. The approach involves the creation of partnerships between pre-service early childhood and engineering students to conceive, develop, implement and evaluate curriculum in the area of math, science and technology by using robotics and the engineering design process. In this paper we first present the theoretical framework for the creation of these partnerships. We then introduce an experience done at Tufts University in which three different forms of partnership models evolved: the collaborator’s model, the external consultant’s model and the developer’s model. We also present different case studies from this experience and finally we conclude with some remarks and observations for making this work scalable and sustainable in other settings and universities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Benenson, G. (2001). The unrealized potential of everyday technology as a context for learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38: 730–745.
Bers, M., Ponte, I., Juelich, K., Viera, A., and Schenker, J. (2002). Teachers as Designers: Integrating Robotics in Early Childhood Education Information Technology in Childhood Education, AACE, pp. 123–145.
Bers, M., and Urrea, C. (2000). Technological prayers: Parents and children working with robotics and values. In Druin, A., and Hendler, J. (Eds.), Robots for Kids: Exploring New Technologies for Learning Experiences. Morgan Kaufman, NY.
Bowman, B. (1999). Policy implications for math, science and technology in early childhood education. In Dialogue on Early Childhood Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, Project 2061, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Bredekamp, S., and Copple, C. (1997). Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs: Serving Children from Birth to Eight. NAYEC Position Statement NAYEC, Washington.
Brosterman, N. (1997). Inventing Kindergarten, Harry N. Adams Inc, New York.
Chille, C., and Britain, L. (1997). The Young Child as Scientist: A Constructivist Approach to Early Childhood Science Education.
Clements, D. (1999). Young children and technology. In Dialogue on Early Childhood Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, Project 2061, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Clements, D., and Sarama, J. (1993). Research on logo: Effects and efficacy. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education 4: 263–290.
Copley, J., and Padron, Y. (1999). Preparing teachers of young learners: Professional development of early childhood teachers in mathematics and science, Project 2061, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Dunfey, P., Gravel, B., Rushton, E., and Salisbury, J. (2003). Applying K-8 engineering education to graduate student studies, American Society of Engineering Education Annual Exposition and Conference Proceedings, Nashville, June 2003.
Intel (2004). Intel in Your Community. Retrieved May 24, 2004, from http://www.intel.com/community
Llewellyn, D., Usselman, M. M., Kingsley, G. (2002). The Georgia Tech Student and Teacher Enhancement Partnership (STEP) Program: A set of models of graduate students working in high schools, American Society of Engineering Education Annual Exposition and Conference Proceedings, Montreal, June 2002.
Lockheed, M. (2004). Education. Retrieved May 24, 2004, from http://www.lockheedmartin.com/wms/findPage.do?dsp=fec&ci=13013&rsbci=13028&fti=0&ti=0&sc=400
Lyons, J., Brader, J. S., and Ebert, C. (2003). GK-12 Enhances Teaching Skills of Engineering Graduate Students, American Society of Engineering Education Annual Exposition and Conference Proceedings, Nashville, June 2003.
Martin, F., Mikhak, B., Resnick, M., Silverman, B., and Berg, R. (2000). To Mindstorms and Beyond: Evolution zzof a Construction Kit for Magical Machines. In Druin, A., and Hendler, J. (Eds.), Robots for Kids: Exploring New Technologies for Learning Experiences, Morgan Kaufman, NY, pp. 9–33.
Massachusetts Department of Education. (2001). Massachusetts Science and Technology/Engineering Curriculum Framework, Massachusetts Department of Education, Malden, MA.
Miaoulis, I. (2001). Introducing engineering into the K-12 learning environments. Environmental Engineering 37: 7–10.
National Academy of Engineering, & National Research Council. (2002). Technically speaking: Why all Americans need to know more about technology, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
National Education Goals Panel (1997), Washington, DC.
National Instruments. (2004). Our Central Commitment: Education. Retrieved May 24, 2004, from http://www.ni.com/company/education.htm
National Science Foundation. (2004). NSF Graduate Teaching Fellows in K-12 Education (GK-12). Retrieved May 24, 2004, from http://www.ehr.nsf.gov/dge/programs/gk12/
Newberry, P. (2001). Technology education in the US: A status report. The Technology Teacher, 8–12.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas, Basic Books, NY.
Papert, S. (2000). What’s the big idea: Towards a pedagogy of idea power. IBM Systems Journal 39: 3–4.
Resnick, M. (1998). Technologies for Lifelong Kindergarten. Educational Technology Research and Development 46(4).
Resnick, M., Berg, R., and Eisenberg, M. (2000). Beyond black boxes: Bringing transparency and aesthetics back to scientific investigation. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 9: 7–30.
Resnick, M., Bruckman, A., and Martin, F. (1996). Pianos not stereos: Creating computational construction kits. Interactions 3: 41–50.
Roth, W. M. (1998). Designing Communities, Kluwer, Boston.
Portsmore, M. (1999). ROBOLAB: Intuitive robotic programming software to support life long learning. APPLE Learning Technology Review, Spring/Summer.
Portsmore, M., Rogers, C., and Pickering, M. (2003) STOMP – Student Teacher Outreach Mentorship Program, American Society of Engineering Education Annual Exposition and Conference Proceedings, Nashville, June 2003.
Rocketdyne (2004). Educational Outreach. Retrieved May 24, 2004, from http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/space/rdyne/communit/edoutrch.html
Sadler, P. M., Coyle, H. P., and Schwartz, M. (2000). Engineering competitions in the middle school classroom: Key elements in developing effective design challenges. Journal of the Learning Sciences 9: 299–327.
Seefeldt, C. (1999). The Early Childhood Curriculum: Current Findings in Theory and Practice M, Teachers College Press, NY.
Tech Corps (2004). Tech Corps. Retrieved May 24, 2004, from http://www.techcorps.org/.
Tsitouridou, M., and Vryzas, K. (2003). Early Childhood Teachers’ Attitudes towards Computer and Information Technology: The Case of Greece. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual 2003: 187–207.
Yildirim, S. (2000). Effects of an educational computing course on preservice and in-service teachers: A discussion and analysis of attitudes and use. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, Summer 32: 475–495.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bers, M.U., Portsmore, M. Teaching Partnerships: Early Childhood and Engineering Students Teaching Math and Science Through Robotics. J Sci Educ Technol 14, 59–73 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-005-2734-1
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-005-2734-1