Abstract
Consider the mixed p-spin models with general environments such that the covariance of Hamiltonian process is non-negative. In this paper, we prove the universality of the superconcentration phenomenon. Precisely, we show that the variance of the free energy grows sublinearly in the size of its expectation when the disordered random variable satisfies some moment matching conditions. Additionally, we also study the universality of first and second moments of the free energy of a spin glass model on general hypergraphs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Auffinger, A., Chen, W.-K.: Universality of chaos and ultrametricity in mixed p-spin models. Commun. Pure. Appl. Math. 69, 2107–2130 (2016)
Bernstein, M., Damron, M., Greenwood, T.: Sublinear variance in Euclidean first-passage percolation. Stoch. Process. Appl. 130, 5060–5099 (2020)
Benjamini, I., Kalai, G., Schramm, O.: First passage percolation has sublinear distance variance. Ann. Probab. 31, 1970–1978 (2003)
Benaim, M., Rossignol, R.: Exponential concentration for first passage percolation through modified Poincaré inequalities. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Probab. Statist. 44, 544–573 (2008)
Carmona, P., Hu, Y.: Universality in Sherrington-Kirkpatrick’s spin glass model. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat. 42, 215–222 (2006)
Chatterjee, S.: A simple invariance theorem. (2005). arXiv.math/0508213
Chatterjee, S.: Chaos, concentration and multiple valleys. (2008). arXiv:0810.4221
Chatterjee, S.: Disorder chaos and multiple valleys in spin glasses. (2009). arXiv:0907.3381
Chatterjee, S.: Superconcentration and related topics. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer, Cham (2014)
Chatterjee, S.: Superconcentration in surface growth. Random Struct. Algorithms (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/rsa.21108
Chen, Y.T.: Universality of Ghirlanda-Guerra identities and spin distributions in mixed p-spin models. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Probab. Stat. 55, 528–550 (2019)
Can, V.H., Nakajima, S.: First passage time of the frog model has a sublinear variance. Electron. J. Probab. 24, 1–27 (2019)
Damron, M., Hanson, J., Sosoe, P.: Sublinear variance in first-passage percolation for general distributions. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 163, 223–258 (2015)
Guerra, F., Toninelli, L.: The thermodynamic limit in mean field spin glass models. Comm. Math. Phys. 30, 71–79 (2002)
Panchenko, D.: The Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Model. Springer, New York (2013)
Panchenko, D.: The Parisi formula for mixed \(p\)-spin models. Ann. Probab. 42, 946–958 (2014)
Parisi, G.: A sequence of approximate solutions to the S-K model for spin glasses. J. Phys. A. 13, L115 (1980)
Talagrand, M.: Gaussian averages, Bernoulli averages, and Gibbs measures. Random Struct. Algorithms 21, 197–204 (2002)
Talagrand, M.: The Parisi formula. Ann. Math. 163, 221–263 (2006)
Tanguy, K.: Some superconcentration inequalities for extrema of stationary Gaussian processes. Stat. Prob. Let. 106, 239–246 (2015)
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the reviewers for their helpful comments that greatly improve our manuscript. The work of V. H. Can is funded by the Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology grant number CTTH00.02/22-23. V. Q. Nguyen and H. S. Vu are supported by the Vingroup Innovation Foundation grant numbers VINIF.2021.TS.103 and VINIF.2020.ThS.69 respectively.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Chiara Cammarota.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: Proof of (10) and (12)
Appendix: Proof of (10) and (12)
For the completeness of the paper, we present the proof of (10) and (12), though it is similar to that of [1, Lemma 2.2].
Using Taylor’s theorem as in [1, proof of Lemma 2.2], we obtain that
where \(x_{e,1},x_{e,2},x_{e,3}\) are some real numbers such that \(|x_{e,i}| \le |y_e|\) for \(i =1,2,3\). By (41), we have
and it follows from (42) that
For any \(K \ge 1\), taking the expectation on \(|y_e| \ge K\) for (43), we have
where
Similarly, taking expectation on \(|y_e| \le K\) for (44) gives that
where
Since \({\mathbb {E}}[y_e^n]={\mathbb {E}}[g^n]\) for \(n=1, \ldots ,k\), we have \({\mathbb {E}}[y_e^{n+1}/(n+1)!] = {\mathbb {E}}[y_e^{n}/n!]\) for \(n=1 \ldots , k-1\) and \({\mathbb {E}}[y_e]=0\). Therefore,
We then deduce from (45) and (46) that
as desired in (10). Finally, thanks to (44) and (47), we get (12). \(\square \)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Can, V.H., Nguyen, V.Q. & Vu, H.S. On the Universality of the Superconcentration in Mixed p-Spin Models. J Stat Phys 190, 80 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-023-03093-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-023-03093-8