Skip to main content
Log in

The Phase Diagram for a Multispecies Left-Permeable Asymmetric Exclusion Process

  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study a multispecies generalization of a left-permeable asymmetric exclusion process (LPASEP) in one dimension with open boundaries. We determine all phases in the phase diagram using an exact projection to the LPASEP solved by us in a previous work. In most phases, we observe the phenomenon of dynamical expulsion of one or more species. We explain the density profiles in each phase using interacting shocks. This explanation is corroborated by simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Derrida, B., Evans, M.R., Hakim, V., Pasquier, V.: Exact solution of a 1d asymmetric exclusion model using a matrix formulation. J. Phys. A 26(7), 1493 (1993)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Blythe, R.A., Evans, M.R.: Nonequilibrium steady states of matrix-product form: a solver’s guide. J. Phys. A 40(46), R333 (2007)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Schadschneider, A.: Traffic flow: a statistical physics point of view. Phys. A 313(1), 153–187 (2002). (Fundamental Problems in Statistical Physics)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Chowdhury, D., Santen, L., Schadschneider, A.: Statistical physics of vehicular traffic and some related systems. Phys. Rep. 329(4), 199–329 (2000)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Penington, C.J., Hughes, B.D., Landman, K.A.: Building macroscale models from microscale probabilistic models: a general probabilistic approach for nonlinear diffusion and multispecies phenomena. Phys. Rev. E 84, 041120 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Evans, M.R., Foster, D.P., Godrèche, C., Mukamel, D.: Asymmetric exclusion model with two species: spontaneous symmetry breaking. J. Stat. Phys. 80(1), 69–102 (1995)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Arita, C.: Phase transitions in the two-species totally asymmetric exclusion process with open boundaries. J. Stat. Mech. 2006(12), P12008 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Uchiyama, M.: Two-species asymmetric simple exclusion process with open boundaries. Chaos Solitons Fractals 35(2), 398–407 (2008)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Ayyer, A., Lebowitz, J.L., Speer, E.R.: On the two species asymmetric exclusion process with semi-permeable boundaries. J. Stat. Phys. 135(5), 1009–1037 (2009)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Ayyer, A., Lebowitz, J.L., Speer, Eugene R.: On some classes of open two-species exclusion processes. Markov Process. Relat. Fields 18(5), 157–176 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Crampe, N., Mallick, K., Ragoucy, E., Vanicat, M.: Open two-species exclusion processes with integrable boundaries. J. Phys. A 48(17), 175002 (2015)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Crampe, N., Evans, M.R., Mallick, K., Ragoucy, E., Vanicat, M.: Matrix product solution to a 2-species TASEP with open integrable boundaries. J. Phys. A 49(47), 475001 (2016)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Ayyer, A., Finn, C., Roy, D.: Matrix product solution of a left-permeable two-species asymmetric exclusion process. Phys. Rev. E 97, 012151 (2018)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Evans, M.R., Ferrari, P.A., Mallick, K.: Matrix representation of the stationary measure for the multispecies TASEP. J. Stat. Phys. 135(2), 217–239 (2009)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Prolhac, S., Evans, M.R., Mallick, K.: The matrix product solution of the multispecies partially asymmetric exclusion process. J. Phys. A 42(16), 165004 (2009)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferrari, P.A., Martin, J.B.: Multi-class processes, dual points and M/M/1 queues. Markov Process. Relat. Fields 12(2), 175–201 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Ferrari, P.A., Martin, J.B.: Stationary distributions of multi-type totally asymmetric exclusion processes. Ann. Probab. 35(3), 807–832, 05 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Ayyer, A., Linusson, S.: Correlations in the multispecies TASEP and a conjecture by lam. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 369(2), 1097–1125 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Cantini, L., Garbali, A., de Gier, J., Wheeler, M.: Koornwinder polynomials and the stationary multi-species asymmetric exclusion process with open boundaries. J. Phys. A 49(44), 444002 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Ayyer, A., Roy, D.: The exact phase diagram for a class of open multispecies asymmetric exclusion processes. Sci. Rep. 7, 13555 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Crampe, N., Finn, C., Ragoucy, E., Vanicat, M.: Integrable boundary conditions for multi-species ASEP. J. Phys. A 49(37), 375201 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Uchiyama, M., Sasamoto, T., Wadati, M.: Asymmetric simple exclusion process with open boundaries and Askey–Wilson polynomials. J. Phys. A 37(18), 4985 (2004)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the referees for a number of useful suggestions. The first and third authors are supported by UGC Centre for Advanced Studies (Grant No. F. 510/25/CAS-II/2018(SAP-I)). The first author was also partly supported by Department of Science and Technology Grant EMR/2016/006624.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arvind Ayyer.

Appendix A: The Even mLPASEP

Appendix A: The Even mLPASEP

We explain the salient features of the phase diagram of the even mLPASEP focusing on the aspects that make the analysis more complicated than that for the odd mLPASEP.

The computation of the generalized phase diagram for the even mLPASEP requires us to project to the single-species ASEP [22] which we review briefly. The ASEP involves only particles and vacancies, denoted by 1 and \(\overline{1}\) respectively. The boundary transitions, in accord with our definitions in Eq. (5) and (4), have the following rates:

figure f

The relevant left and right boundary parameters are \(\lambda = \kappa _{\alpha _{1}, \gamma '_{0}}^{+}\) and \(b = \kappa _{\beta , \delta }^{+}\) respectively, where \(\kappa ^\pm _{u,v}\) is defined in (7). With this notation, the phase diagram formally looks exactly like Fig. 1 with the same nomenclature for the phases: phase \(\overline{\mathbb {1}}\) (MC), 0 (LD) and \(\mathbb {1}\) (HD). The currents and densities of species 1 for all three phases are also identical to those in Table 1. The density profiles for ASEP can also be understood by appealing to shocks. Since this is reviewed by Blythe and Evans in [2], we only illustrate the shock picture for the coexistence line \(b=\lambda >1\) in Fig. 9, where the shock has zero mean velocity. In the LD (resp. HD) phase, the shock has positive (resp. negative) velocity and is pinned to the right (resp. left).

Fig. 9
figure 9

The shock picture for ASEP on the co-existence line \(b=\lambda >1\)

Fig. 10
figure 10

Time-average densities in four species mLPASEP for species \(\overline{2}\) (red circles), \(\overline{1}\) (magenta diamonds), 0 (green boxes), 1 (blue crosses) and 2 (black triangles) for a phase \(\overline{\mathbb {2}}\) (\( \lambda _1 \simeq 0.23 ,\lambda _2 \simeq 0.84, b \simeq 0.65\)), b phase \(\overline{\mathbb {1}}\) (\( \lambda _1 \simeq 0.44, \lambda _2 \simeq 2.65, b \simeq 0.75\)), c phase 0 (\( \lambda _1 \simeq 2.27, \lambda _2 \simeq 6.5, b \simeq 0.92\)), d phase \(\mathbb {1}\) (\( \lambda _1 \simeq 1.17, \lambda _2 \simeq 6.45, b \simeq 3.09\)), e phase \(\mathbb {2}\) (\( \gamma _1 \simeq 0.12 , q=0.41, \beta =0.15,\delta =0.86, \lambda _1 \simeq 1.17, \lambda _2 \simeq 6.45, b \simeq 9.28\)), f 0\(-\mathbb {1}\) co-existence line (\( \lambda _1 = 3, \lambda _2 \simeq 7.18, b = 3 \)), and g\(\mathbb {1}-\mathbb {2}\) co-existence line (\( \lambda _1 \simeq 1.34, \lambda _2 = 6, b = 6\)). For all simulations, we fix the lattice size to be 1000 (Color figure online)

Fig. 11
figure 11

The shock picture for the even mLPASEP on the 0\(-\mathbb {1}\) co-existence line

The phase diagrams for the even mLPASEP with 2r species and the odd mLPASEP with \((2r+1)\) species have identical structure as depicted in Fig. 3. The main difference between the two is that the 1-colouring projects the even mLPASEP to the ASEP so that the boundary parameters are \(\lambda _{1}=\kappa ^{+}_{\theta _{1}, \gamma '_{0}}\) and \(b=\kappa ^{+}_{\beta , \delta }\). All other k-colourings continue to project the even mLPASEP to the LPASEP with boundary parameters \(\lambda _{k} = \theta _{k}/\phi '_{k}\) and \(b= \kappa ^{+}_{\beta , \delta }\)., where \(\theta _{k} = \sum _{i=k}^{r} \alpha _{i}\) and \(\phi '_{i} = \sum _{i=1}^{k-1}\left( \alpha _{i} + \alpha _{\overline{i}} \right) \) were defined in Sect. 2.2.

Taking into account all possible colourings, there are \(r+1\) relevant boundary parameters, namely, \(\lambda _{1}, \ldots , \lambda _{r}\) and b. Again, the inequalities \(\lambda _{1}< \lambda _{2}< \cdots < \lambda _{r}\) are satisfied. Because of these relations among \(\lambda _{i}\)’s, we arrive at the same phase diagram in Fig. 3 which shows all \(2r+1\) phases in the even mLPASEP. In all phases except phase 0, the densities of all species have the same expression in the even mLPASEP as given in Table 2. In phase 0, the densities of 1 and \(\overline{1}\) are \((f(\lambda _{1}) - f(\lambda _{2}))\) and \((\overline{f}(\lambda _{1}) - f(\lambda _{2}))\) respectively. We illustrate the density profiles with simulations for the 4-species even mLPASEP in Fig. 10.

The shock picture in the even mLPASEP is identical to that in the odd mLPASEP in all coexistence lines except the 0\(-\mathbb {1}\) boundary.

On this coexistence line, 1’s and \(\overline{1}\)’s form a shock with zero drift as shown in Fig. 11. The shock is pinned to the right (resp. left) boundary in phase 0 (resp. \(\mathbb {1}\)). In phase \(\overline{\mathbb {1}}\), the density of these two species become equal and the height of the shock goes to zero as the system approaches this phase along the 0\(-\mathbb {1}\) coexistence line. We have performed simulations showing instantaneous density profiles for the even mLPASEP with four species on the 0\(-\mathbb {1}\) boundary and the results exactly match with the theoretical prediction.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ayyer, A., Finn, C. & Roy, D. The Phase Diagram for a Multispecies Left-Permeable Asymmetric Exclusion Process. J Stat Phys 174, 605–621 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-018-2183-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-018-2183-x

Keywords

Navigation