Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sustainable Development and Spatial Inhomogeneities

  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Historical data, theory and computer simulations support a connection between growth and economic inequality. Our present world with large regional differences in economic activity is a result of fast economic growth during the last two centuries. Because of limits to growth we might expect a future world to develop differently with far less growth. The question that we here address is: “Would a world with a sustainable economy be less unequal?” We then develop integrated spatial economic models based on limited resources consumption and technical knowledge accumulation and study them by the way of computer simulations. When the only coupling between world regions is diffusion we do not observe any spatial unequality. By contrast, highly localized economic activities are maintained by global market mechanisms. Structures sizes are determined by transportation costs. Wide distributions of capital and production are also predicted in this regime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. According to Gell-Mann, the use of very simple assessment models, the Crude Look At the Whole, is well adapted to policy makers who don’t care about details.

  2. When firms invest in production rather than in buying stock, part of the capital decreases in time because for instance of machines maintenance.

  3. The scheme also allows to predict the possible emergence of “dissipative structures” in space [13]: a constant influx of energy is dissipated after going through intermediate stages including positive loops involved in the production process.

  4. This expression from economics simply means that production scales linearly with the productions factors K and C: a firm with twice as much capital using twice as much resource has a twice as much output.

  5. Since production is a concave function with respect to C, a positive profit is only made when production increases faster than cost for low values of C. p<A is then a necessary condition for a positive profit. The expressions obtained under the assumption A 0p remain valid for a large price domain as checked by numerical simulations.

  6. In fluctuating economic conditions, a customer never knows precisely whether her order to a provider will be delivered. She then distributes orders to different providers to minimise risks. This is often described by economists as the exploration/exploitation compromise: exploit available knowledge about best providers but keep on exploring other possibilities.

  7. Actual profit could be a rational choice for attractivity. We already said that in noisy environments, actors rather guide their choice on a moving average of profit upon characteristic time \(\frac{1}{\delta_{K}}\), which is precisely K according to Eq. (3).

  8. Noisy environments induce losses when resources are not delivered. Checking more expensive non-local providers for supply is an insurance against such losses; β is thus related to the cost of these failures of delivery.

  9. Since some variables also take 0 values they are translated by 0.1 to figure on the log-log plot.

References

  1. Anderson, P.W.: Suggested model for prebiotic evolution: the use of chaos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80(11), 3386 (1983)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, S.P., De Palma, A., Thisse, J.-F.: Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bairoch, P.: Victoires et déboires: histoire économique et sociale du monde du XVIe siècle à nos jours, vol. 3. Gallimard, Paris (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barro, R.J., Sala-i Martin, X.: Economic Growth. McGraw-Hill, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bénard, H.: Les tourbillons cellulaires dans une nappe liquide. Rev. Gén. Sci. Pures Appl. 11, 1261–1271 (1900) 1309–1328

    Google Scholar 

  6. Challet, D., Solomon, S., Yaari, G.: The universal shape of economic recession and recovery after a shock. Economics 3, 200936 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clark, C.W.: Mathematical Bioeconomics: The Optimal Management of Renewable Resources. Wiley, New York (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Cobb, C.W., Douglas, P.H.: A theory of production. Am. Econ. Rev. 18, 139–165 (1928)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Combes, P.-P., Mayer, T., Thisse, J.-F.: Economic Geography: The Integration of Regions and Nations. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dover, Y., Moulet, S., Solomon, S., Yaari, G.: Do all economies grow equally fast? Risk Decis. Anal. 1(3), 505–513 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ermentrout, G.B., Cowan, J.D.: A mathematical theory of visual hallucination patterns. Biol. Cybern. 34(3), 137–150 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Gell-Mann, M.: Transformations of the twenty-first century: transitions to greater sustainability. In: Global Sustainability: A Nobel Cause, p. 1 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Glansdorff, P., Prigogine, I.: Thermodynamic Theory of Structure Stability and Fluctuations. Wiley, London (1971)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Krugman, P.R.: The Self-Organizing Economy. Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge/Oxford (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kuemmel, R., Henn, J., Lindenberger, D.: Capital, labor, energy and creativity: modeling innovation diffusion. Struct. Chang. Econ. Dyn. 13, 415–433 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Louzoun, Y., Shnerb, N.M., Solomon, S.: Microscopic noise, adaptation and survival in hostile environments. Eur. Phys. J. B 56(2), 141–148 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Louzoun, Y., Solomon, S., Atlan, H., Cohen, I.R.: Proliferation and competition in discrete biological systems. Bull. Math. Biol. 65(3), 375–396 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Louzoun, Y., Solomon, S., Goldenberg, J., Mazursky, D.: World-size global markets lead to economic instability. Artif. Life 9(4), 357–370 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. McKay, D.J.C.: Sustainable Energy—Without the Hot Air. UIT Cambridge, England (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moulet, S.: Impact de l’organisation du marché : Comparaison de la négociation de gré à gré et des enchères descendantes. Technical report, GREQAM, Marseille (2008)

  21. Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G.: An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Belknap Press, Cambridge (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nordhaus, W.D.: A review of the stern review on the economics of climate. J. Econ. Lit. 45(3), 686–702 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shnerb, N.M., Bettelheim, E., Louzoun, Y., Agam, O., Solomon, S.: Adaptation of autocatalytic fluctuations to diffusive noise. Phys. Rev. E 63(2), 21103 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Shnerb, N.M., Louzoun, Y., Bettelheim, E., Solomon, S.: The importance of being discrete: life always wins on the surface. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97(19), 10322 (2000)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Simon, H.: Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science (1991)

  27. Stern, N.H.: The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Turing, A.M.: The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, Biol. Sci. 237(641), 37–72 (1952)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Weisbuch, G.: Complex Systems Dynamics, Santa-Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity. Addison-Wesley, Redwood (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Weisbuch, G., Kirman, A., Herreiner, D.: Market organisation and trading relationships. Econ. J. (Lond.) 110(463), 411–436 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Weitzman, M.L.: Risk-adjusted gamma discounting. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 60(1), 1–13 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Yaari, G., Solomon, S., Rokocy, K., Nowak, A.: Microscopic study reveals the singular origins of growth. Eur. Phys. J. B 62(4), 505–513 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Yaari, G., Stauffer, D., Solomon, S.: Intermitency and localization. In: Meyers, R. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science, vol. 3, pp. 4920–4930. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Markus Brede, Adrian Carro, Bernard Derrida, Roger Guesnerie, Alan Kirman, Yoram Louzoun, Hubertus de Vries and Bin Xu for helpful discussions and suggestions. We thank referees for raising interesting and important issues.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gérard Weisbuch.

Appendix

Appendix

We here report the results of numerical tests to check the meta-stability of the observed patterns, possible scaling effects and the role of initial configurations.

1.1 5.1 Scaling

The system does no display noticeable side effects. We tested the number of active cells with A>100 for varying lattice sizes after 10000 iteration steps. The fraction of active sites was respectively 19.8 % for a 30×30 cell lattice, 19.1 % for 50×50 cells and 19.6 % for 100×100 cells. We found that the observed difference in percentage to be not significative.

1.2 5.2 Patterns Stability

Because the system is noisy we used the Pearson correlation coefficient to measure the correlation between a pattern of capital K taken at time 5000 and patterns observed at further times until t=10,000. We use a 50×50 network. The Pearson coefficient is measured by:

$$ r(\tau)=\frac{\sum_i (x_i(t)-\overline{x(t)})(x_i(t+\tau)-\overline{x(t+\tau)})}{ \sqrt{\sum_i (x_i(t)-\overline{x(t)})^2}\sqrt{\sum_i (x_i(t+\tau)-\overline{x(t+\tau)})^2}} $$
(27)

The Pearson coefficient decreases from 1 to 0.99 in 5000 time steps which demonstrates a long term stability after quasi equilibrium has been reached. We also checked the stability of the correlations between one cell and its neighbours at varying distances over 5000 time steps and similarly checked stability (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Time evolution of capital spatial correlations at varying distances r(1), r(2), r(3) and r(4)

1.3 5.3 Influence of Initial Conditions

A choice of initial conditions is arbitrary and we reported in Sect. 3 results obtained from random initial conditions without any spatial correlation. On the other hand, since the present state of the world is already structured in industrial regions, the possible importance of initial structures is worthwhile to study. We then ran simulations with initial sinusoidal patterns of A and K such that:

(28)
(29)

with several wave vectors k=2/L, n=2, 5, 10 and lattice size L=50 (Fig. 9). Resource initial distribution were random.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Production patterns at large integration times, 1000, for different periodic initial conditions

The fraction of active sites is respectively 6.16, 11.18 and 19.32 % for n=2, 5, 10. Not surprisingly in view of the previously observed metastability, initial conditions do play a role in the final aspect of the patterns. The meso-scale initial periodicity is maintained while the micro structure of the localised peaks of activity reflects the character of the dynamics, independently from the initial conditions.

One might be tempted to investigate further the transition from present socio-economic patterns to future conditions with different energy sources. Let us remind that we are not able to describe the dynamics of the slow technological change that would drive the transition. The above set of remarks does not allow precise predictions: what we can still conclude is that some memory of the present large scale spatial structures could be maintained.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weisbuch, G. Sustainable Development and Spatial Inhomogeneities. J Stat Phys 151, 475–493 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-012-0639-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-012-0639-y

Keywords

Navigation