Advertisement

Journal of Scheduling

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 49–75 | Cite as

Implicit shift scheduling with multiple breaks and work stretch duration restrictions

  • Monia Rekik
  • Jean-François CordeauEmail author
  • François Soumis
Article

Abstract

This paper considers a shift scheduling problem that includes different forms of flexibility in terms of shift starting times, break lengths and break placement. Two particular forms are studied: fractionable breaks and work stretch duration restrictions. Unlike standard breaks, fractionable breaks are not required to be attributed as a whole. They can be divided into fractions of breaks under some conditions. The distribution of breaks within a shift is done with respect to work stretch duration restrictions to ensure a correct mix of periods of work and rest. Two implicit models are proposed. They extend previous work on implicit modeling of break placement to incorporate the concepts of fractionable breaks and work stretch duration restrictions. In this context, we show the merits of using the so-called forward and backward constraints to model work stretch duration restrictions. We also introduce a new formulation of the forward and backward constraints and demonstrate that it considerably reduces the density of the constraint matrix of the two proposed models. Finally, we study the impact of fractionable breaks and work stretch duration restrictions and show that, for some instances, the use of these concepts considerably reduces the workforce size when compared to other traditional approaches.

Keywords

Shift scheduling Flexibility Breaks Work stretch restrictions Forward and backward constraints 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Addou, I., & Soumis, F. (2007). Bechtold–Jacobs generalized model for shift scheduling with extraordinary overlap. Annals of Operations Research, 155(1), 177–205. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aykin, T. (1996). Optimal shift scheduling with multiple break windows. Management Science, 42, 591–602. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aykin, T. (1998). A composite branch and cut algorithm for optimal shift scheduling with multiple breaks and break windows. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49, 603–615. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aykin, T. (2000). A comparative evaluation of modeling approaches to the labor shift scheduling problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 125, 381–397. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bailey, J. (1985). Integrated days off and shift personnel scheduling. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 9, 395–404. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bailey, J., & Fields, J. (1985). Personnel scheduling with flexshift models. Journal of Operations Management, 5, 327–338. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baker, K. R. (1976). Workforce allocation in cyclic scheduling problems: A survey. Operational Research Quarterly, 27, 155. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bard, J. F., Binici, C., & deSilva, A. H. (2003). Staff scheduling at the United States Postal Service. Computers & Operations Research, 30, 745–771. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bartholdi, J. J. (1981). A guaranteed-accuracy round-off algorithm for cyclic scheduling and set covering. Operations Research, 29, 501–510. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bechtold, S. E., & Jacobs, L. W. (1990). Implicit modeling of flexible break assignments in optimal shift scheduling. Management Science, 36, 1339–1351. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bechtold, S. E., & Jacobs, L. W. (1993). Labor utilization effects of labor scheduling flexibility alternatives in a tour scheduling environment. Decision Sciences, 24, 148–166. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bechtold, S. E., & Jacobs, L. W. (1996). The equivalence of general set-covering and implicit integer programming formulations for shift scheduling. Naval Research Logistics, 43, 233–249. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brusco, M. J., & Jacobs, L. W. (1995). Cost analysis of alternative formulations for personnel scheduling in continuously operating organisations. European Journal of Operational Research, 86, 249–261. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brusco, M. J., & Jacobs, L. W. (2000). Optimal models for meal-break and start-time flexibility in continuous tour scheduling. Management Science, 46, 1630–1641. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Çezik, T., & Günlük, O. (2004). Reformulating linear programs with transportation constraints with applications to workforce scheduling. Naval Research Logistics, 51, 275–296. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dantzig, G. B. (1954). A comment on Edie’s traffic delays at toll booths. Operations Research, 2, 339–341. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Desaulniers, G., & Hickman, M. (2007). Public transit. In G. Laporte & C. Barnhart (Eds.), Handbooks in operations research and management science, transportation (Vol. 14, pp. 69–127). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar
  18. Gaballa, A., & Pearce, W. (1979). Telephone sales manpower planning at Quantas. Interfaces, 9, 1–9. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Henderson, W. B., & Berry, W. L. (1976). Heuristic methods for telephone operator shift scheduling: an experimental analysis. Management Science, 22, 1372–1380. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Keith, E. G. (1979). Operator scheduling. AIIE Transactions, 11, 37–41. Google Scholar
  21. Moondra, S. L. (1976). An L.P. model for workforce scheduling in banks. Journal of Bank Research, 6, 299–301. Google Scholar
  22. Rekik, M. Cordeau, J.-F. Soumis, F. (2004). Using Benders decomposition to implicitly model tour scheduling. Annals of Operations Research, 128, 111–133. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rekik, M., Cordeau, J.-F., & Soumis, F. (2008). Solution approaches to large shift scheduling problems. RAIRO Operations Research, 42, 229–258. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Segal, M. (1974). The operator scheduling problem: a network flow approach. Operations Research, 22, 808–824. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Thompson, G. M. (1995). Improved implicit optimal modeling of the labor shift scheduling problem. Management Science, 41, 595–607. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monia Rekik
    • 1
  • Jean-François Cordeau
    • 2
    Email author
  • François Soumis
    • 1
  1. 1.École Polytechnique de Montréal and GERADMontréalCanada
  2. 2.HEC Montréal and GERADMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations