Advertisement

Journal of Scheduling

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 315–341 | Cite as

The task assignment problem for unrestricted movement between workstation groups

  • Jonathan F. BardEmail author
  • Lin Wan
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the problem of assigning tasks to workers during their daily shifts. For a homogeneous workforce, a given set of workstation groups, and a corresponding demand for labor, the objective is to develop a disaggregated schedule for each worker that minimizes the weighted sum of transitions between workstation groups. In the formulation of the problem, each day is divided into 48 1/2-hour time periods and a multi-commodity network is constructed in which each worker corresponds to a unique commodity and each node represents a workstation group-time period combination. Lunch breaks and idle time are also included in the model.

Initial attempts to solve large instances with a commercial code indicated a need for a more practical approach. This led to the development of a reduced network representation in which idle periods are treated implicitly, and a sequential methodology in which the week is decomposed into 7 daily problems and each solved in turn. To gain more computational efficiency, a tabu search procedure was also developed.

All procedures were tested using data obtained from a U.S. Postal Service mail processing and distribution center. Depending on the labor category, anywhere from 3 to 28 workstation groups and up to 311 full-time and part-time workers had to be scheduled together. The results were mixed. While small problems could be solved to near-optimality with the integer programming approaches, tabu search was the best alternative for the very large instances. However, the excessive number of swaps needed to gain marginal improvements, undermined its effectiveness.Combining the two provided a good balance in most cases.

Keywords

Multi-commodity network Integer programming Tabu search Task assignment problem 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aronson, J. E., “The Multi-Period Assignment Problem: A Multi Commodity Network Flow Model and Specialized Branch and Bound Algorithm,” European Journal Of Operational Research, 23, 367–381, (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aykin, T., “Optimal Shift Scheduling with Multiple Break Windows,” Management Science, 42(4), 591–602, (1996).Google Scholar
  3. Bard, J.F., “Selecting the Appropriate Input Data Set When Configuring a Permanent Workforce,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, 47(4), 371–389, (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bard, J.F., C. Binici, and A.H. deSilva, “Staff Scheduling at the United States Postal Service,” Computers & Operations Research, 30(5), 745–771, (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bechtold, S. E and L.W. Jacobs, “Implicit Modeling of Flexible Break Assignments in Optimal Shift Scheduling,” Management Science, 36(11), 1339–1351, (1990).Google Scholar
  6. Berman, O., R.C. Larson, and E. Pinker, “Scheduling Workforce and Workflow in a High Volume Factory,” Management Science, 43(2), 158–172, (1997).Google Scholar
  7. Brusco, M. J and L. W. Jacobs, “Personal Tour Scheduling When Starting Time Restrictions are Present,” Management Science, 44(4), 534–547, (1998).Google Scholar
  8. Burke, E. K., P. D. Causmaecker, G. Vanden Berghe and H. Van Landeghem, “The State of the Art of Nurse Rostering,” Journal of Scheduling, 7(6), 441–499, (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burns, R. N, and M. W. Carter, “Work Force Size and Single Shift Schedules with Variable Demands,” Management Science, 31(5), 599–607, (1985).Google Scholar
  10. Campbell, G. M. and M. Diaby, “Development and Evaluation of an Assignment Heuristic for Allocating Cross-Trained Workers,” European Journal of Operational Research, 138(1), 9–20, (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheang, B., H. Li, A. Lim, and B. Rodrigues, “Nurse Rostering Problems—A Bibliographic Survey,” European Journal of Operational Research, 151, 447–460, (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ernst, A.T., H. Jiang, M. Krishnamoorthy, and D. Sier, “Staff Scheduling and Rostering: A Review of Applications, Methods and Models,” European Journal of Operational Research, 153(1), 3–17, (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dawid, H., J. Konig, and C. Strauss, “An Enhanced Rostering Model for Airline Crews,” Computers & Operations Research, 28, 671–688, (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Franz, L.S and J.L. Miller, “Scheduling Medical Residents to Rotations: Solving the Large-Scale Multi-Period Staff Assignment Problem,” Operations Research, 41(2), 269–279, (1993).Google Scholar
  15. Garey, M.R and D.S. Johnson, Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness, W.H. Freeman: New York, NY, 1979.Google Scholar
  16. Glover, F. and M. Laguna, Tabu Search, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston, MA, 1997.Google Scholar
  17. Hall, R.W. and D. Lotspeich, “Optimized Lane Assignment on an Automated Highway,” Transportation Research, Part C: Emerging Technology, 4(4), 211–229, (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jarrah, A.I.Z., J.F. Bard, and A.H. deSilva, “Solving Large-scale Tour Scheduling Problems,” Management Science, 40(9), 1124–1145, (1994).Google Scholar
  19. Lewis, L.H., A. Srinivasan and E. Subramanian, “Staffing and Allocation of Workers in an Administrative Office,” Management Science, 44(4), 548–570, (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Malhotra, M.K., L.P. Ritzman, W.C. Benton, and G.K. Leong, “A Model for Scheduling Postal Distribution Employees,” European Journal of Operational Research, 58, 374–385, (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mukherjee, A.K. and K.C. Gilbert, “Lagrangian Heuristics for Instructor Scheduling in Executive Development Programmes,” Journal of Operations Research Society, 48(4), 373–382, (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nanda, R. and J. Browne, Introduction to Employee Scheduling, Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York, NY, 1992.Google Scholar
  23. Sherali, H.D. and J. C. Smith, “Improving Discrete Model Representations via Symmetry Considerations,” Management Science, 47(10), 1396–1407, (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Showalter, M.J., L.J. Krajewski, and L.P. Ritzman, “Manpower Allocation in US Postal Facilities: A Heuristic Approach,” Computers & Operations Research, 4(4), 257–269, (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate Program in Operations Research and Industrial EngineeringThe University of TexasAustin
  2. 2.Seattle

Personalised recommendations