Abstract
Pulse-like ground motions may have only a distinct strong pulse or multiple pulses within the velocity time-history. These intrinsic pulses are hidden in low-frequency components that can impose extreme seismic demands on structures. This study presents a simple approach based on the empirical Fourier decomposition (EFD) to extract the intrinsic pulses of pulse-like ground motions. Based on the proposed approach, first, the original ground velocity is decomposed into several Fourier spectrum components (FSCs) via the EFD method. Among these FSCs, the significant low-frequency components are identified based on a proposed relative energy indicator (Ere). Ere is defined as the ratio of the Fourier square amplitude of the FSC to that of the original ground velocity. Next, pulse component is obtained by superimposing the minimum number of significant low-frequency components so that their total energy is above than 70% of the original ground velocity energy. Finally, the strong pulse is extracted from the pulse component by the peak point method. Results obtained by the EFD decomposed method are compared to those obtained from wavelet method for 91 pulse-like ground motions. The results show that the proposed method can extract the intrinsic pulses of pulse-like ground motions with reasonable accuracy. The proposed approach is further applied for classification of near-fault pulse-like ground motions in a dataset of ground motion records. According to the classification results, ground motions with a relative energy value greater than 0.30 can be characterized as pulse-like.
Highlights
• The intrinsic pulses of pulse like ground motions are extracted based on the empirical Fourier decomposition (EFD) technique.
• The Fourier component with the high relative energy can be considered as significant low-frequency component.
• Ground motions with Ep values above 0.30 are considered as pulse-like ground motions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alavi B, Krawinkler H (2001) Effects of near-fault ground motions on frame structures. John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford, p 301
Alavi B, Krawinkler H (2004) Behavior of moment-resisting frame structures subjected to near-fault ground motions. Earthqake Eng Struct Dynam 33:687–706
Baker JW (2007) Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97(5):1486–1501
Bray JD, Rodriguez-Marek A (2004) Characterization of forward-directivity ground motions in the near-fault region. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24(11):815–828
Chen X, Wang D (2020) Multi-pulse characteristics of near-fault ground motions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 137:106275
Chen X, Wang D, Zhang R (2019) Identification of pulse periods in near-fault ground motions using the HHT method. Bull Seismol Soc Am 109(6):2384–2398
Cork TG, Kim JH, Mavroeidis GP, Kim JK, Halldorsson B, Papageorgiou AS (2016) Effects of tectonic regime and soil conditions on the pulse period of near-fault ground motions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 80:102–118
Dickinson B, Gavin H (2011) Parametric statistical generalization of uniform-hazard earthquake ground motions. J Struct Eng 137:410–422
Ertuncay D, Costa G (2019) An alternative pulse classification algorithm based on multiple wavelet analysis. J Seismolog 23(4):929–942
Feng J, Zhao B, Zhao T (2021) Quantitative identification of near-fault pulse-like ground motions based on variational mode decomposition technique. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 151:107009
Gilles J, Tran G, Osher S (2014) 2D empirical transforms. Wavelets ridgelets 7(1):157–186
Halldórsson B, Mavroeidis GP, Papageorgiou AS (2011) Near-fault and far-field strong ground-motion simulation for earthquake engineering applications using the specific barrier model. J Struct Eng 137(3):433–444
Huang NE, Shen Z, Long SR, Wu MC, Shih HH, Zheng Q, Yen N-C, Tung CC, Liu HH (1998) The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proceedings Mathematical Physical & Engineering Sci 454(1971):903–995. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1998.0193
Khanse AC, Lui EM (2010) Pulse extraction and displacement response evaluation for long-period ground motions. The IES J Part a: Civil & Structural Engineering 3(4):211–223
Liu S, Li Y, Wang G (2017) A method to extract successive velocity pulses governing structural response from long-period ground motion. J Seismolog 21(6):1345–1359
Liu Z, Li X, Zhang Z (2020) Quantitative identification of near-fault ground motions based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition. KSCE J Civ Eng 24(3):922–930
Lu Y, Panagiotou M (2014) Characterization and representation of near-fault ground motions using cumulative pulse extraction with wavelet analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 104(1):410–426
Mavroeidis GP, Papageorgiou AS (2003) A mathematical representation of near-fault ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:1099–1131
Mavroeidis GP, Dong G, Papageorgiou AS (2004) Near-fault ground motions, and the response of elastic and inelastic singledegree-of freedom (SDOF) systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 33(9):1023–1049
Menun C, Fu Q (2002) An analytical model for near-fault ground motions and the response of SDOF systems, Proc. 7th U.S. National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Boston, Massachusetts, p 10
Pavel F (2021) Analysis of pulse-like ground motion recordings from Vrancea intermediate-depth earthquakes. J Seismolog 25(2):733–745
Quaranta G, Mollaioli F (2019) Analysis of near-fault pulse-like seismic signals through variational mode decomposition technique. Eng Struct 193:121–135
Shahi SK, Baker JW (2014) An efficient algorithm to identify strong-velocity pulses in multicomponent ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 104(5):2456–2466
Sharbati R, Rahimi R, Koopialipoor MR, Elyasi N, Khoshnoudian F, Ramazi HR, Amindavar HR (2020) Detection and extraction of velocity pulses of near-fault ground motions using asymmetric Gaussian chirplet model. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 133:106123
Singh P, Joshi SD, Patney RK, Saha K (2017) The Fourier decomposition method for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society a: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sci 473(2199):20160871
Somerville PG, Smith NF, Graves RW, Abrahamson NA (1997) Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):199–222
Spudich P, Chiou BSJ (2008) Directivity in NGA earthquake ground motions: analysis using isochrone theory. Earthq Spectra 24(1):279–298
Tang Y, Zhang J (2011) Response spectrum-oriented pulse identification and magnitude scaling of forward directivity pulses in near-fault ground motions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31(1):59–76
Wang GQ (2006) Surface waves in the western Taiwan coastal plain from an aftershock of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96(3):821–845
Xu Z, Agrawal A (2010) Decomposition and effects of pulse components in near-field ground motions. J Struct Eng 136(6):690–699
Yaghmaei-Sabegh S (2010) Detection of pulse-like ground motions based on continues wavelet transform. J Seismol 14(4):715–726
Yaghmaei-Sabegh S (2021) Evaluation of pulse effect on frequency content of ground motions and definition of a new characteristic period. Earthquake and Structures 20(4):457–471
Yalcin OF, Dicleli M (2020) Effect of the high frequency components of near-fault ground motions on the response of linear and nonlinear SDOF systems: a moving average filtering approach. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 129:105922
Zamora C, Riddell R (2011) Elastic and inelastic response spectra considering near-fault effects. J Earthq Eng 15:775–808
Zhai C, Chang Z, Li S, Chen Z, Xie L (2013) Quantitative identification of near-fault pulse-like ground motions based on energy. Bull Seismol Soc Am 103(5):2591–2603
Zhai C, Li C, Kunnath S, Wen W (2018) An efficient algorithm for identifying pulse-like ground motions based on significant velocity half-cycles. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 47(3):757–771
Zhang Y, Hu Y, Zhao F, Liang J, Yang C (2005) Identification of acceleration pulses in near-fault ground motion using the EMD method. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 4(2):201–212
Zhao GC, Xu L, Xie L (2016) Study on low-frequency characterizations of pulse-type ground motions through multi-resolution analysis. J Earthquake Eng 20(6):1011–1033
Zhao G, Xu L, Gardoni P, Xie L (2019) A new method of deriving the acceleration and displacement design spectra of pulse-like ground motions based on the wavelet multi-resolution analysis. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 119:1–10
Zhou W, Feng Z, Xu YF, Wang X, Lv H (2022) Empirical Fourier decomposition: an accurate signal decomposition method for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 163:108155
Bolt, B. A. and Abrahamson, N. A. (2003) Estimation of strong seismic ground motions, in International Handbook of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology, eds. W. H. K. Lee, H. Kanamori, P. C. Jennings and C. Kisslinger (San Diego, CA: Academic Press). pp. 983–1001. (Part B)
Ghobarah A (2004) Response of structures to near-fault ground motion. In: 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, vol 1031
Zhao, D., Wang, H., Wang, D., Zhu, R., & Zhang, J. (2022, January). Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions selected by energy indicators. In Structures (Vol. 35, pp. 780–791). Elsevier
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ghanbari, B., Fathi, M. Extraction of velocity pulses of pulse-like ground motions using empirical Fourier decomposition. J Seismol 26, 967–986 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-022-10106-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-022-10106-8