Skip to main content
Log in

Stress shadow, stress triggering, and recent earthquake activity in the Kashmir Himalaya, India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Seismology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 02 March 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

The Kishtwar-Chamba-Zanskar Region in Kashmir Himalaya show increased earthquake activity during last few years, especially, after the 2013 earthquake sequence in Kishtwar area that includes the 2013 Kishtwar earthquake (MW 5.6). More recently, a similar sequence (2019–2020) has been recorded in the east (Zanskar) and southeast (Chamba) of Kishtwar area. We evaluate the present seismicity scenario of Kishtwar-Chamba-Zanskar Region, which involves spatio-temporal analysis, energy budget, slip-deficit, and coulomb stress transfer, using a homogenized earthquake catalog for the period from 1965 to July 2020. The analysis suggests that 2013 sequence occurred after a quiescence period of ~ 23 years, i.e., from 1991 to April 2013 and the study region was under stress shadow, possibly created by the 1991 Uttarkashi earthquake (MW 6.8). Further, the recent seismic activity since 2013, mark the beginning of new earthquake cycle with frequent moderate earthquakes. The coulomb stress analysis further suggests that stress transfer due to 2013 Kishtwar earthquake (MW 5.6) may have triggered the recent earthquake activity in the region, including 2019–2020 sequence. The energy budget and slip deficit calculated using the earthquake data of more than five decades, indicate that the region has the potential for a large earthquake of MW ~ 7.0.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The earthquake catalog used in the present study and its relevant earthquake raw data (if necessary) can be accessed from the official website of National Center for Seismology at https://seismo.gov.in/seismological-data

Change history

References

  • Aki K, Richards PG (2002) Quantitative seismology (Vol. 1), Sausalito, CA: University Science Books, pp 1–700

  • Banerjee P, Bürgmann R (2002) Convergence across the northwest Himalaya from GPS measurements. Geophys Res Lett 29(13):30–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bender B (1983) Maximum likelihood estimation of b values for magnitude grouped data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73(3):831–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta S, Mukhopadhyay B (2019) Revisiting two damaging Indian earthquakes of 1885: Kashmir and Bengal. J Geol Soc India 93(3):263–268

  • Dziewonski AM, Chou TA, Woodhouse JH (1981) Determination of earthquake source parameters from waveform data for studies of global and regional seismicity. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 86(B4):2825–2852

  • Ekström G, Nettles M, Dziewoński AM (2012) The global CMT project 2004–2010: Centroid-moment tensors for 13,017 earthquakes. Phys Earth Planet Inter 200:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freed AM (2005) Earthquake triggering by static, dynamic, and postseismic stress transfer. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 33:335–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gahalaut VK, Kalpna (2001) Himalayan mid-crustal ramp. Curr Sci 81:1641–1646

    Google Scholar 

  • Gahalaut VK, Rajput S, Kundu B (2011) Low seismicity in the Bhutan Himalaya and the stress shadow of the 1897 Shillong Plateau earthquake. Phys Earth Planet Inter 186(3–4):97–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gansser A (1964) Geology of the Himalayas. Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1954) Seismicity of the earth and associated phenomena, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p 310

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirata T (1989) Fractal dimension of fault systems in Japan: fractal structure in rock fracture geometry at various scales. Pure Appl Geophys 131(1–2):157–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00874485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan YY, Knopoff L (1980) Spatial distribution of earthquakes: the two-point correlation function. Geophys J Int 62(2):303–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanamori H, Anderson DL (1975) Theoretical basis of some empirical relations in seismology. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65(5):1073–1095

    Google Scholar 

  • Khattri KN (1987) Great earthquakes, seismicity gaps and potential for earthquake disaster along the Himalaya plate boundary. Tectonophysics 138:79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King GC, Bowman DD (2003) The evolution of regional seismicity between large earthquakes. J Geophy Res Solid Earth, 108(B2), https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000783.

  • Li S, Wang Q, Yang S, Qiao X, Nie Z, Zou R, Ding K, He P, Chen G (2018) Geodetic imaging mega-thrust coupling beneath the Himalaya. Tectonophysics 747:225–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot BB (1983) The fractal geometry of nature. New York, W.H. Freeman and Company, 173, pp 51

  • McCann WR, Nishenko SP, Sykes LR, Krause J (1979) Seismic gaps and plate tectonics: seismic potential for major boundaries. Pure Appl. Geophys., 117 (1979), pp 1082–1147, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00876211

  • Nalbant SS, McCloskey J (2011) Stress evolution before and after the 2008 Wenchuan, China earthquake. Earth Planet Sci Lett 307(1–2):222–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Centre for Seismology (2021) online bulletin. https://seismo.gov.in/seismological-data. Accessed Nov 2021

  • Ni J, Barazangi M (1984) Seismotectonics of the Himalayan collision zone: Geometry of the underthrusting Indian plate beneath the Himalaya. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 89(B2):1147–1163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öncel AO, Main I, Alptekin Ö, Cowie P (1996) Spatial variations of the fractal properties of seismicity in the Anatolian fault zones. Tectonophysics 257(2–4):189–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey SJ, Bhat GM, Puri S, Raina N, Singh Y, Pandita SK, Verma M, Bansal BK, Sutar A (2017) Seismotectonic study of Kishtwar region of Jammu Province using local broadband seismic data. J Seismolog 21(3):525–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parija MP, Kumar S, Tiwari VM, Biswal S, Biswas A, Velliyidathu A (2021) Coulomb stress modeling and seismicity in the Western Himalaya, India since 1905: implications for the incomplete ruptures of the main Himalayan Thrust. Tectonics 40(9):e2020TC006204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons T, Yeats RS, Yagi Y, Hussain A, (2006) Static stress change from the 8 October, 2005 M= 7.6 Kashmir earthquake. Geophysical Research Letters 33(6). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025429

  • Prasath RA, Bansal B, Verma M (2021) Stress distribution in the Western India-Eurasia collision zone: its kinematics and seismotectonic implications. Preprint at ESSOAr. https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10507171.2

  • Reasenberg P (1985) Second-order moment of central California seismicity, 1969–1982. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 90(B7):5479–5495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz CH (1968) The frequency-magnitude relation of microfracturing in rock and its relation to earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58(1):399–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma Y, Pasari S, Ching KE, Dikshit O, Kato T, Malik JN, Chang CP, Yen JY (2020) Spatial distribution of earthquake potential along the Himalayan arc. Tectonophysics 791:228556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava HN, Verma M, Bansal BK, Sutar AK (2015) Discriminatory characteristics of seismic gaps in Himalaya. Geomat Nat Haz Risk 6(3):224–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein RS, King GC, Lin J (1994) Stress triggering of the 1994 M= 6.7 Northridge, California, earthquake by its predecessors. Science 265(5177):1432–1435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakur VC (1992) Geology of Western Himalaya. Pregamon Press, Oxford, p 363

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakur VC (1998) Structure of the Chamba nappe and position of the Main Central Thrust in Kashmir Himalaya. J Asian Earth Sci 16:269–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakur VC, Jayangondaperumal R (2015) Seismogenic active fault zone between 2005 Kashmir and 1905 Kangra earthquake meizoseismal regions and earthquake hazard in eastern Kashmir seismic gap. Curr Sci (00113891) 109(3)

  • Toda S, Stein RS, Sevilgen V, Lin J (2011) Coulomb 3.3 Graphic-rich deformation and stress-change software for earthquake, tectonic, and volcano research and teaching—user guide. US Geological Survey open-file report 2011-1060, pp.63, https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2011/1060/

  • Tosi P (1998) Seismogenic structure behaviour revealed by spatial clustering of seismicity in the Umbria-Marche Region (Central Italy). Ann Geophys 41(2):215–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma M, Bansal BK (2012) Indian National GNSS Programme: crustal deformation measurements in the Indian Sub-continent. J Asian Earth Sci 50:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84(4):974–1002

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiemer S, Wyss M (1997) Mapping the frequency-magnitude distribution in asperities: An improved technique to calculate recurrence times? J Geophys Res Solid Earth 102(B7):15115–15128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiemer S (2001) A software package to analyze seismicity: ZMAP. Seismol Res Lett 72(3):373–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyss M (1973) Towards a physical understanding of the earthquake frequency distribution. Geophys J Int 31(4):341–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida K, Uchida N, Hiarahara S, Nakayama T, Matsuzawa T, Okada T, Matsumoto Y, Hasegawa A (2020) 2019 M6 7 Yamagata-Oki earthquake in the stress shadow of 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake: was it caused by the reduction in fault strength? Tectonophysics 793:228609

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors express their gratitude to Secretary of the Ministry of Earth Sciences, New Delhi, for his continuous support and encouragement. Earthquake catalog retrieved from the National Centre for Seismology, New Delhi, is acknowledged. We are thankful to Mahesh Parija and Anup Sutar for their help and support. BKB is also thankful to Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi for extending necessary support. RAP is thankful to Joyeeta, Komal, Ojas, and Dhamu for their help and support.

Funding

The earthquake catalog used in the present study has been retrieved from the National Center for Seismology, New Delhi, under Ministry of Earth Sciences, India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Arun Prasath.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interests

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: The caption for Figures 1, 5 and 6 have been changed from one-column to two-column layout. Correct presentation regarding the corrections made can be found in the erratum/correction for this article.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 83 KB)

Supplementary file2 (XLSX 11 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prasath, R.A., Verma, M. & Bansal, B.K. Stress shadow, stress triggering, and recent earthquake activity in the Kashmir Himalaya, India. J Seismol 26, 167–179 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-021-10067-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-021-10067-4

Keywords

Navigation