Abstract
The Kishtwar-Chamba-Zanskar Region in Kashmir Himalaya show increased earthquake activity during last few years, especially, after the 2013 earthquake sequence in Kishtwar area that includes the 2013 Kishtwar earthquake (MW 5.6). More recently, a similar sequence (2019–2020) has been recorded in the east (Zanskar) and southeast (Chamba) of Kishtwar area. We evaluate the present seismicity scenario of Kishtwar-Chamba-Zanskar Region, which involves spatio-temporal analysis, energy budget, slip-deficit, and coulomb stress transfer, using a homogenized earthquake catalog for the period from 1965 to July 2020. The analysis suggests that 2013 sequence occurred after a quiescence period of ~ 23 years, i.e., from 1991 to April 2013 and the study region was under stress shadow, possibly created by the 1991 Uttarkashi earthquake (MW 6.8). Further, the recent seismic activity since 2013, mark the beginning of new earthquake cycle with frequent moderate earthquakes. The coulomb stress analysis further suggests that stress transfer due to 2013 Kishtwar earthquake (MW 5.6) may have triggered the recent earthquake activity in the region, including 2019–2020 sequence. The energy budget and slip deficit calculated using the earthquake data of more than five decades, indicate that the region has the potential for a large earthquake of MW ~ 7.0.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The earthquake catalog used in the present study and its relevant earthquake raw data (if necessary) can be accessed from the official website of National Center for Seismology at https://seismo.gov.in/seismological-data
Change history
02 March 2022
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-022-10081-0
References
Aki K, Richards PG (2002) Quantitative seismology (Vol. 1), Sausalito, CA: University Science Books, pp 1–700
Banerjee P, Bürgmann R (2002) Convergence across the northwest Himalaya from GPS measurements. Geophys Res Lett 29(13):30–31
Bender B (1983) Maximum likelihood estimation of b values for magnitude grouped data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73(3):831–851
Dasgupta S, Mukhopadhyay B (2019) Revisiting two damaging Indian earthquakes of 1885: Kashmir and Bengal. J Geol Soc India 93(3):263–268
Dziewonski AM, Chou TA, Woodhouse JH (1981) Determination of earthquake source parameters from waveform data for studies of global and regional seismicity. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 86(B4):2825–2852
Ekström G, Nettles M, Dziewoński AM (2012) The global CMT project 2004–2010: Centroid-moment tensors for 13,017 earthquakes. Phys Earth Planet Inter 200:1–9
Freed AM (2005) Earthquake triggering by static, dynamic, and postseismic stress transfer. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 33:335–367
Gahalaut VK, Kalpna (2001) Himalayan mid-crustal ramp. Curr Sci 81:1641–1646
Gahalaut VK, Rajput S, Kundu B (2011) Low seismicity in the Bhutan Himalaya and the stress shadow of the 1897 Shillong Plateau earthquake. Phys Earth Planet Inter 186(3–4):97–102
Gansser A (1964) Geology of the Himalayas. Interscience, New York
Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1954) Seismicity of the earth and associated phenomena, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p 310
Hirata T (1989) Fractal dimension of fault systems in Japan: fractal structure in rock fracture geometry at various scales. Pure Appl Geophys 131(1–2):157–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00874485
Kagan YY, Knopoff L (1980) Spatial distribution of earthquakes: the two-point correlation function. Geophys J Int 62(2):303–320
Kanamori H, Anderson DL (1975) Theoretical basis of some empirical relations in seismology. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65(5):1073–1095
Khattri KN (1987) Great earthquakes, seismicity gaps and potential for earthquake disaster along the Himalaya plate boundary. Tectonophysics 138:79–92
King GC, Bowman DD (2003) The evolution of regional seismicity between large earthquakes. J Geophy Res Solid Earth, 108(B2), https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000783.
Li S, Wang Q, Yang S, Qiao X, Nie Z, Zou R, Ding K, He P, Chen G (2018) Geodetic imaging mega-thrust coupling beneath the Himalaya. Tectonophysics 747:225–238
Mandelbrot BB (1983) The fractal geometry of nature. New York, W.H. Freeman and Company, 173, pp 51
McCann WR, Nishenko SP, Sykes LR, Krause J (1979) Seismic gaps and plate tectonics: seismic potential for major boundaries. Pure Appl. Geophys., 117 (1979), pp 1082–1147, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00876211
Nalbant SS, McCloskey J (2011) Stress evolution before and after the 2008 Wenchuan, China earthquake. Earth Planet Sci Lett 307(1–2):222–232
National Centre for Seismology (2021) online bulletin. https://seismo.gov.in/seismological-data. Accessed Nov 2021
Ni J, Barazangi M (1984) Seismotectonics of the Himalayan collision zone: Geometry of the underthrusting Indian plate beneath the Himalaya. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 89(B2):1147–1163
Öncel AO, Main I, Alptekin Ö, Cowie P (1996) Spatial variations of the fractal properties of seismicity in the Anatolian fault zones. Tectonophysics 257(2–4):189–202
Pandey SJ, Bhat GM, Puri S, Raina N, Singh Y, Pandita SK, Verma M, Bansal BK, Sutar A (2017) Seismotectonic study of Kishtwar region of Jammu Province using local broadband seismic data. J Seismolog 21(3):525–538
Parija MP, Kumar S, Tiwari VM, Biswal S, Biswas A, Velliyidathu A (2021) Coulomb stress modeling and seismicity in the Western Himalaya, India since 1905: implications for the incomplete ruptures of the main Himalayan Thrust. Tectonics 40(9):e2020TC006204
Parsons T, Yeats RS, Yagi Y, Hussain A, (2006) Static stress change from the 8 October, 2005 M= 7.6 Kashmir earthquake. Geophysical Research Letters 33(6). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025429
Prasath RA, Bansal B, Verma M (2021) Stress distribution in the Western India-Eurasia collision zone: its kinematics and seismotectonic implications. Preprint at ESSOAr. https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10507171.2
Reasenberg P (1985) Second-order moment of central California seismicity, 1969–1982. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 90(B7):5479–5495
Scholz CH (1968) The frequency-magnitude relation of microfracturing in rock and its relation to earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58(1):399–415
Sharma Y, Pasari S, Ching KE, Dikshit O, Kato T, Malik JN, Chang CP, Yen JY (2020) Spatial distribution of earthquake potential along the Himalayan arc. Tectonophysics 791:228556
Srivastava HN, Verma M, Bansal BK, Sutar AK (2015) Discriminatory characteristics of seismic gaps in Himalaya. Geomat Nat Haz Risk 6(3):224–242
Stein RS, King GC, Lin J (1994) Stress triggering of the 1994 M= 6.7 Northridge, California, earthquake by its predecessors. Science 265(5177):1432–1435
Thakur VC (1992) Geology of Western Himalaya. Pregamon Press, Oxford, p 363
Thakur VC (1998) Structure of the Chamba nappe and position of the Main Central Thrust in Kashmir Himalaya. J Asian Earth Sci 16:269–282
Thakur VC, Jayangondaperumal R (2015) Seismogenic active fault zone between 2005 Kashmir and 1905 Kangra earthquake meizoseismal regions and earthquake hazard in eastern Kashmir seismic gap. Curr Sci (00113891) 109(3)
Toda S, Stein RS, Sevilgen V, Lin J (2011) Coulomb 3.3 Graphic-rich deformation and stress-change software for earthquake, tectonic, and volcano research and teaching—user guide. US Geological Survey open-file report 2011-1060, pp.63, https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2011/1060/
Tosi P (1998) Seismogenic structure behaviour revealed by spatial clustering of seismicity in the Umbria-Marche Region (Central Italy). Ann Geophys 41(2):215–224
Verma M, Bansal BK (2012) Indian National GNSS Programme: crustal deformation measurements in the Indian Sub-continent. J Asian Earth Sci 50:1–6
Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84(4):974–1002
Wiemer S, Wyss M (1997) Mapping the frequency-magnitude distribution in asperities: An improved technique to calculate recurrence times? J Geophys Res Solid Earth 102(B7):15115–15128
Wiemer S (2001) A software package to analyze seismicity: ZMAP. Seismol Res Lett 72(3):373–382
Wyss M (1973) Towards a physical understanding of the earthquake frequency distribution. Geophys J Int 31(4):341–359
Yoshida K, Uchida N, Hiarahara S, Nakayama T, Matsuzawa T, Okada T, Matsumoto Y, Hasegawa A (2020) 2019 M6 7 Yamagata-Oki earthquake in the stress shadow of 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake: was it caused by the reduction in fault strength? Tectonophysics 793:228609
Acknowledgements
Authors express their gratitude to Secretary of the Ministry of Earth Sciences, New Delhi, for his continuous support and encouragement. Earthquake catalog retrieved from the National Centre for Seismology, New Delhi, is acknowledged. We are thankful to Mahesh Parija and Anup Sutar for their help and support. BKB is also thankful to Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi for extending necessary support. RAP is thankful to Joyeeta, Komal, Ojas, and Dhamu for their help and support.
Funding
The earthquake catalog used in the present study has been retrieved from the National Center for Seismology, New Delhi, under Ministry of Earth Sciences, India.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interests
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this article was revised: The caption for Figures 1, 5 and 6 have been changed from one-column to two-column layout. Correct presentation regarding the corrections made can be found in the erratum/correction for this article.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prasath, R.A., Verma, M. & Bansal, B.K. Stress shadow, stress triggering, and recent earthquake activity in the Kashmir Himalaya, India. J Seismol 26, 167–179 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-021-10067-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-021-10067-4