Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Design and implementation of a traffic light system for deep geothermal well stimulation in Finland

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Seismology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We describe the design and implementation of a traffic light system (TLS) created for the stimulation phase of a 6.1-km-deep geothermal well in the Helsinki area, Finland. Because of the lack of local seismic data to calibrate the TLS, the TLS thresholds have been proposed on the basis of two parameters: acceptable ground motion levels and probabilities to reach these levels, which were then used to establish TLS magnitudes. A peak ground velocity (PGV) of 1 mm/s associated with a ML ≥ 1 event, or a ML ≥ 1.2 event alone, triggered an Amber alert. A PGV of 7.5 mm/s associated with a ML ≥ 2.1 event triggered a Red alert, where ML was a local “Helsinki” magnitude. Specific thresholds based on PGV and peak ground acceleration were gathered for critical infrastructure sites and related to earthquake magnitudes in a probabilistic way. The implementation of the TLS during the stimulation showed that the selected thresholds were reasonably conservative. Some of the Amber events were reportedly felt or heard, but the public opinion remained very favourable to the project. Measured ground motions were too low to have any impact on the built environment and the stimulation was able to proceed without being impaired by the occurrence of a Red event. Seismic data acquired during the stimulation and lessons learnt are presented and used to revisit the TLS thresholds for potential future stimulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ader T, Chendorain M, Free M, Saarno T, Heikkinen P, Malin PE, Leary P, Valenzuela S, Kwiatek G, Dresen G, Bluemle F, Vuorinen T (2019) Setting up traffic light system thresholds for geothermal stimulation in Helsinki, Finland. In: 2019 SECED Conference, Greenwich, London, accepted

  • Bachmann CE (2012) Induced seismicity in Rosemanowes, 16 pp, GEISER report D5.3 – Hazard models for specific test areas

  • Bommer JJ, Oates S, Cepeda JM, Lindholm C, Bird J, Torres R, Marroquín G, Rivas J (2006) Control of hazard due to seismicity induced by a hot fractured rock geothermal project. Eng Geol 83(4):287–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bommer JJ (2017) Predicting and monitoring ground motions induced by hydraulic fracturing. OGA-commissioned paper

  • Bosman K, Baig A, Viegas G, Urbancic T (2016) Towards an improved understanding of induced seismicity associated with hydraulic fracturing. First break 34:61–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Broccardo M, Mignan A, Wiemer S, Stojadinovic B, Giardini D (2017) Hierarchical Bayesian modeling of fluid-induced seismicity. Geophys Res Lett 44:11,357–11,367. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BSI (1993) Evaluation and measurements for vibration in buildings - Part 2: Guide to damage levels due to groundborne vibrations. BS 7385-2, British Standards Institute

  • BSI (2008) Guide to evaluation of human response to vibration in buildings - Part 1: Vibration sources other than blasting. BS 6472-1, British Standards Institute

  • Cuenot N, Dorbath C, Dorbath L (2008) Analysis of the Microseismicity induced by fluid injections at the EGS site of soultz-sous-forêts (Alsace, France): implications for the characterization of the geothermal reservoir properties. Pure Appl Geophys 165:797–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diehl T, Kraft T, Kissling E, Wiemer S (2017) The induced earthquake sequence related to the St. Gallen deep geothermal project (Switzerland): fault reactivation and fluid interactions imaged by microseismicity. J Geophys Res Solid Earth, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014473

  • Douglas J, Edwards B, Convertito V, Sharma N, Tramelli A, Kraaijpoel D, Cabrera BM, Maercklin N, Troise C (2013) Predicting ground motion from induced earthquakes in geothermal areas. Bull Seismol Soc Am 103:1875–1897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellsworth WL (2013) Injection-induced earthquakes. Science 341:1225942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galis M, Ampuero JP, Mai PM, Cappa F (2017) Induced seismicity provides insight into why earthquake ruptures stop. Science Advances 3: eaap7528. Available: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aap7528

  • GEISER (2013) D5.3 - Hazard models for specific test areas, Report

  • Giardini D (2009) Geothermal quake risks must be faced. Nature 462:848–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gischig VS, Wiemer S, Alcolea A (2014) Balancing reservoir creation and seismic hazard in enhanced geothermal systems. Geophys J Int 198(3):1585–1598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grünthal G (2014) Induced seismicity related to geothermal projects versus natural tectonic earthquakes and other types of induced seismic events in Central Europe. Geothermics, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2013.09.009

  • Guglielmi Y, Cappa F, Avouac JP, Henry P, Elsworth D (2015) Seismicity triggered by fluid injection–induced aseismic slip. Science 348:1224–1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haering MO, Schanz U, Ladner F, Dyer BC (2008) Characterisation of the Basel 1 enhanced geothermal system. Geothermics 37:469–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halldorsson B, Ólafsson S, Snæbjörnsson JT, Sigurdsson SU, Rupakhety R, Sigbjörnsson R (2012) On the effects of induced earthquakes due to fluid injection at Hellisheidi geothermal power plant, Iceland. In: 15th world conference on earthquake engineering

  • Hallo M, Oprsal I, Eisner L, Ali MY (2014) Prediction of magnitude of the largest potentially induced seismic event. J Seismol 18:421–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanks TC, Kanamori H (1979) A moment magnitude scale. J Geophys Res 84(B5):2348–2350. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB084iB05p02348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwiatek G, Martínez-Garzón P, Dresen G, Bohnhoff M, Sone H, Hartline C (2015) Effects of long-term fluid injection on induced seismicity parameters and maximum magnitude in northwestern part of the Geysers geothermal field. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 120, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB012362

  • Kwiatek G, Saarno T, Ader T, Bluemle F, Bohnhoff M, Chendorain M, Dresen G, Heikkinen P, Kukkonen I, Leary P, Leonhardt M, Malin P, Martínez-Garzón P, Passmore K, Passmore P, Valenzuela S, Wollin C (2019) Controlling fluid-induced seismicity during a 6.1-km-deep geothermal stimulation in Finland. Sci Adv 5(5):eaav7224. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav7224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarr A (2014) Maximum magnitude earthquakes induced by fluid injection. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 119:1008–1019. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JB010597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mignan A, Broccardo M, Wiemer S, Giradini D (2017) Induced seismicity closed-form traffic light system for actuarial decision-making during deep fluid injections. Sci Rep 7:13607. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13585-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mignan A, Karvounis D, Broccardo M, Wiemer S, Giardini D (2019) Including seismic risk mitigation measures into the Levelized cost of electricity in enhanced geothermal systems for optimal siting. Appl Energy 238:831–850 . ISSN 0306–2619, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RIL 253-2010 (2010) Rakentamisen aiheuttamat tärinät 2010. Helsinki: Suomen Rakennusinsinöörien Liitto

  • Lund B, Malm MM, Mäntyniemi PB, Oinonen KJ, Tiira T et al (2015) Evaluating seismic hazard for the Hanhikivi nuclear power plant site, seismological characteristics of the source areas, attenuation of seismic signal, and probabilistic analysis of seismic hazard. F-Consult Ltd, 258 p Saari J (ed)

  • Shapiro SA, Dinske C, Langenbruch C (2010) Seismogenic index and magnitude probability of earthquakes induced during reservoir fluid stimulations. Leading Edge 29(3):304–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro SA, Krüger O S, Dinske C (2013) Probability of inducing given-magnitude earthquakes by perturbing finite volumes of rocks. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 118, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrb.50264

  • Schultz R (2018) Bridging gaps in induced seismicity hazard forecasting in Alberta, Canada, presentation at the 36th general assembly of the European seismological commission 6 september 2018, Valletta, Malta

  • Uski M, Tuppurainen A (1996) A new local magnitude scale for the Finnish seismic network. Seism Source Parameters Microearthquakes Large Events 261:23–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Elst NJ, Page MT, Weiser DA, Goebel THW, Hosseini SM (2016) Induced earthquake magnitudes are as large as (statistically) expected. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 121:4575–4590. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB012818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westaway R, Younger PL (2014) Quantification of potential macroseismic effects of the induced seismicity that might result from hydraulic fracturing for shale gas exploitation in the UK. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 47(4):333–350. https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2014-011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiemer S, Kraft T, Trutnevyte E, Roth P (2017) ‘Good practice’ guide for managing induced seismicity in deep geothermal energy projects in Switzerland. In: Proceedings from the 20th EGU General Assembly held 4-13 April, 2018, Vienna, Austria, pp 15021

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Arup, 13 Fitzroy Street, W1T 4BQ, London, UK

    Thomas Ader, Michael Chendorain & Matthew Free

  2. St1 Deep Heat Oy, Purotie 1/PL 100, 00381, Helsinki, Finland

    Tero Saarno & Pekka Heikkinen

  3. Advanced Seismic Instrumentation & Research, 1311 Waterside, Dallas, TX, 75218-4475, USA

    Peter Eric Malin & Peter Leary

  4. Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 4.2: Geomechanics and Rheology, Potsdam, Germany

    Grzegorz Kwiatek & Georg Dresen

  5. Free University Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Grzegorz Kwiatek

  6. University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany

    Georg Dresen

  7. fastloc GmbH, Berlin, Germany

    Felix Bluemle

  8. Institute of Seismology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

    Tommi Vuorinen

Authors
  1. Thomas Ader
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Chendorain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matthew Free
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tero Saarno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pekka Heikkinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Peter Eric Malin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Peter Leary
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Grzegorz Kwiatek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Georg Dresen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Felix Bluemle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Tommi Vuorinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Ader.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ader, T., Chendorain, M., Free, M. et al. Design and implementation of a traffic light system for deep geothermal well stimulation in Finland. J Seismol 24, 991–1014 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-019-09853-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-019-09853-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation