Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The maximum expected earthquake magnitudes in different future time intervals of six seismotectonic zones of Iran and its surroundings

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Seismology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the crucial components in seismic hazard analysis is the estimation of the maximum earthquake magnitude and associated uncertainty. In the present study, the uncertainty related to the maximum expected magnitude μ is determined in terms of confidence intervals for an imposed level of confidence. Previous work by Salamat et al. (Pure Appl Geophys 174:763-777, 2017) shows the divergence of the confidence interval of the maximum possible magnitude mmax for high levels of confidence in six seismotectonic zones of Iran. In this work, the maximum expected earthquake magnitude μ is calculated in a predefined finite time interval and imposed level of confidence. For this, we use a conceptual model based on a doubly truncated Gutenberg-Richter law for magnitudes with constant b-value and calculate the posterior distribution of μ for the time interval Tf in future. We assume a stationary Poisson process in time and a Gutenberg-Richter relation for magnitudes. The upper bound of the magnitude confidence interval is calculated for different time intervals of 30, 50, and 100 years and imposed levels of confidence α = 0.5, 0.1, 0.05, and 0.01. The posterior distribution of waiting times Tf to the next earthquake with a given magnitude equal to 6.5, 7.0, and 7.5 are calculated in each zone. In order to find the influence of declustering, we use the original and declustered version of the catalog. The earthquake catalog of the territory of Iran and surroundings are subdivided into six seismotectonic zones Alborz, Azerbaijan, Central Iran, Zagros, Kopet Dagh, and Makran. We assume the maximum possible magnitude mmax = 8.5 and calculate the upper bound of the confidence interval of μ in each zone. The results indicate that for short time intervals equal to 30 and 50 years and imposed levels of confidence 1 − α = 0.95 and 0.90, the probability distribution of μ is around μ = 7.16 − 8.23 in all seismic zones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambraseys NN, Melville CP (1982) A history of Persian earthquakes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Berberian M (1994) Natural hazards and the first earthquake catalogue of Iran. Vol. 1: Historical hazards in Iran prior to 1900. A UNESCO/IIEES Publication during UN/IDNDR: International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Tehran

  • Berberian M, Yeats RS (1999) Patterns of historical earthquake rupture in the Iranian plateau. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89(1):120–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell KW (1982) Bayesian analysis of extreme earthquake occurrences. Part I Probabilistic hazard model. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72(5):1689–1705

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner J, Knopoff L (1974) Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian? Bull Seismol Soc Am 64(5):1363–1367

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1956) Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy, and acceleration (second paper). Bull Seismol Soc Am 46(2):105–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Hessami K, Jamali F (2006) Explanatory notes to the map of major active faults of Iran. J Seismol Earthq Eng JSEE 8(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Holschneider M, Zöller G, Hainzl S (2011) Estimation of the maximum possible magnitude in the framework of a doubly truncated Gutenberg–Richter model. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101(4):1649–1659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IGUT (2015) The Iranian seismological center. University of Tehran, Iran. http://irsc.ut.ac.ir/bulletin.php. Accessed 15 Dec 2015

  • IIEES (2015) International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Tehran. Iran. http://www.iiees.ac.ir/iiees/EQsearch/55uqakes45. Accessed 15 Dec 2015

  • ISC (2015a) International seismological center. EHB bulletin, Thatcham, UK. http://www.isc.ac.uk. Accessed 15 Dec 2015

  • ISC (2015b) International seismological center, online bulletin. Thatcham, UK. http://www.isc.ac.uk/search/index.html. Accessed 15 Dec 2015

  • Jackson J, McKenzie D (1988) The relationship between plate motions and seismic moment tensor, and the rates of active deformation in Mediterranean and Middle East. Geophys J 93:45–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan YY, Jackson DD (2013) Tohoku earthquake: a surprise? Bull Seismol Soc Am 103(2B):1181–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan YY, Schoenberg F (2001) Estimation of the upper cutoff parameter for the tapered Pareto distribution. J Appl Probab 38:158–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanamori H (1977) The energy release in great earthquakes. J Geophys Res 82(20):2981–2987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimiparidari S, Zaré M, Memarian H, Kijko A (2013) Iranian earthquakes, a uniform catalog with moment magnitudes. J Seismol 17(3):897–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasahara K (1981) Earthquake mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kijko A (2004) Estimation of the maximum earthquake magnitude, Mmax. Pure Appl Geophys 161(8):1655–1681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kijko A, Singh M (2011) Statistical tools for maximum possible earthquake magnitude estimation. Acta Geophys 59(4):674–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirzaei N, Mengtan G, Yuntai C (1998) Seismic source regionalization for seismic zoning of Iran: major seismotectonic provinces. J Earthq Prediction Res 7:465–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi Bafrouei SH, Mirzaei N, Shabani E (2015) A declustered earthquake catalog for the Iranian Plateau. Ann Geophys 57(6)

  • NEIC (2015) National earthquake information center bulletin. US Geological Survey, CO, USA. http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/epic. Accessed 15 Dec 2015

  • Niazi M, Basford JR (1968) Seismicity of Iranian plateau and Hindu Kush region. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58(1):417–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowroozi AA (1971) Seismo-tectonics of the Persian plateau, eastern Turkey, Caucasus, and Hindu-Kush regions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 61(2):317–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowroozi AA (1976) Seismotectonic provinces of Iran. Bull Seismol Soc Am 66(4):1249–1276

    Google Scholar 

  • Olver FW (2010) NIST handbook of mathematical functions hardback and CD-ROM. Cambridge University press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisarenko VF (1991) Statistical evaluation of maximum possible earthquakes, Izvestiya Phys. Solid Earth 27:757–763

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisarenko VF, Lysenko VB (1997) Probability distribution of the maximal earthquake in a given time interval. Izv-Phys Solid Earth 33(6):438–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisarenko VF, Rodkin MV (2009) The instability of the Mmax parameter and an alternative to its using. Izv-Phys Solid Earth 45(12):1081–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisarenko V, Lyubushin A, Lysenko V, Golubeva T (1996) Statistical estimation of seismic hazard parameters: maximum possible magnitude and related parameters. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86(3):691–700

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisarenko VF, Sornette A, Sornette D, Rodkin MV (2008) New approach to the characterization of Mmax and of the tail of the distribution of earthquake magnitudes. Pure Appl Geophys 165:847–888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-008-0341-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salamat M, Zare M, Holschneider M, Zöller G (2017) Calculation of confidence intervals for the maximum magnitude of earthquakes in different seismotectonic zones of Iran. Pure Appl Geophys 174(3):763–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahvar MP, Zare M, Castellaro S (2013) A unified seismic catalog for the Iranian plateau (1900–2011). Seismol Res Lett 84(2):233–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoja Taheri J, Niazi M (1981) Seismicity of the Iranian plateau and bordering regions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 71(2):477–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavakoli B, Ghafory Ashtiany M (1999) Seismic hazard assessment of Iran. Ann Geophys 42(6)

  • Wessel P, Smith WHF (1991) Free software helps map and display data. EOS 72:441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson AT (1930) Earthquakes in Persia. B Sch Orient Afr St 6(01):103–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zöller G (2013) Convergence of the frequency-magnitude distribution of global earthquakes: maybe in 200 years. Geophys Res Lett 40(15):3873–3877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zöller G, Holschneider M, Hainzl S (2013) The maximum earthquake magnitude in a time horizon: theory and case studies. Bull Seismol Soc Am 103(2A):860–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zöller G, Holschneider M, Hainzl S, Zhuang J (2014) The largest expected earthquake magnitudes in Japan: the statistical perspective. Bull Seismol Soc Am 104(2):769–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zöller G, Ullah S, Bindi D, Palorai S, Mikhailova N (2015) The largest expected earthquake magnitude in Central Asia: statistical inference from an earthquake catalog with uncertain magnitude. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 432:432–433

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the associate editor and two anonymous reviewers for useful comments that helped enhance the manuscript. GZ acknowledges support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 1294). MS and MZ are grateful to the International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology of Iran (IIEES).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES), Tehran, Iran

    Mona Salamat & Mehdi Zare

  2. Institute of Mathematics, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany

    Gert Zöller

  3. Department of Statistics, School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

    Mortaza Amini

Authors
  1. Mona Salamat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gert Zöller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mehdi Zare
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mortaza Amini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehdi Zare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salamat, M., Zöller, G., Zare, M. et al. The maximum expected earthquake magnitudes in different future time intervals of six seismotectonic zones of Iran and its surroundings. J Seismol 22, 1485–1498 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-018-9780-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-018-9780-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation