Advertisement

Journal of Seismology

, Volume 22, Issue 5, pp 1225–1246 | Cite as

Earthquake recurrence models and occurrence probabilities of strong earthquakes in the North Aegean Trough (Greece)

  • Christos Kourouklas
  • Eleftheria Papadimitriou
  • George Tsaklidis
  • Vassilios Karakostas
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

The determination of strong earthquakes’ recurrence time above a predefined magnitude, associated with specific fault segments, is an important component of seismic hazard assessment. The occurrence of these earthquakes is neither periodic nor completely random but often clustered in time. This fact in connection with their limited number, due to shortage of the available catalogs, inhibits a deterministic approach for recurrence time calculation, and for this reason, application of stochastic processes is required. In this study, recurrence time determination in the area of North Aegean Trough (NAT) is developed by the application of time-dependent stochastic models, introducing an elastic rebound motivated concept for individual fault segments located in the study area. For this purpose, all the available information on strong earthquakes (historical and instrumental) with Mw ≥ 6.5 is compiled and examined for magnitude completeness. Two possible starting dates of the catalog are assumed with the same magnitude threshold, Mw ≥ 6.5 and divided into five data sets, according to a new segmentation model for the study area. Three Brownian Passage Time (BPT) models with different levels of aperiodicity are applied and evaluated with the Anderson–Darling test for each segment in both catalog data where possible. The preferable models are then used in order to estimate the occurrence probabilities of Mw ≥ 6.5 shocks on each segment of NAT for the next 10, 20, and 30 years since 01/01/2016. Uncertainties in probability calculations are also estimated using a Monte Carlo procedure. It must be mentioned that the provided results should be treated carefully because of their dependence to the initial assumptions. Such assumptions exhibit large variability and alternative means of these may return different final results.

Keywords

Earthquake recurrence time North Aegean Trough Time-dependent models BPT distribution 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The constructive comments of an anonymous reviewer are greatly appreciated and contributed to the improvement of the manuscript. Gratitude also extended to Dr. M. García Fernández for his editorial assistance. The maps are generated using the Generic Mapping Tool (http://www.soest.hawaii.edu/gmt; Wessel and Smith 1998). All the calculations and plots are made using the MATLAB software (www.mathworks.com/products/matlab). Fault plane solutions used in this study were taken from http://Ideo.columbia.edu/~gcmt. We acknowledge support of this work by the project “HELPOS – Hellenic System for Lithosphere Monitoring” (MIS 5002697) which is implemented under the Action “Reinforcement of the Research and Innovation Infrastructure”, funded by the Operational Programme “Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation” (NSRF 2014-2020) and co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Regional Development Fund), Geophysics Department Contribution 908.

References

  1. Abaimov SG, Turcotte DL, Shcherbakov R, Rundle JB, Yakovlev G, Goltz C, Newman WI (2008) Earthquakes: recurrence and interoccurrence times. Pure Appl Geophys 165:777–795.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-008-0331-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambraseys N (2002) The seismic activity of the Marmara Sea region over the last 2000 years. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ambraseys N (2009) Earthquakes in the Eastern Mediterranean and the Middle East: a multidisciplinary study of 2000 years of seismicity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 947 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ambraseys N, Jackson JA (2000) Seismicity of the Sea of Marmara (Turkey) since 1500. Geophys J Int 141:F1–F6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biasi GP, Langridge RM, Berryman KR, Clark KJ, Cochran UA (2015) Maximum-likelihood recurrence parameters and conditional probability of a ground-rupturing earthquake on the southern Alpine fault, South Island, New Zealand. Bull Seismol Soc Am 105:96–106.  https://doi.org/10.1785/0120130259 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brinkman BAW, LeBlanc MP, Uhl TJ, Ben-Zion Y, Dahmen KA (2016) Probabilistic model of waiting times between large failures in sheared media. Phys Rev E. 93.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.93.013003
  7. Console R, Carluccio R, Papadimitriou E, Karakostas V (2015) Synthetic earthquake catalogs simulating seismic activity in the Corinth Gulf, Greece, fault system. J Geophys Res 120:326–343.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011765 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corral A (2003) Local distribution and rate fluctuations in a unified scaling law for earthquakes. Phys Rev E 68:035102.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.68.035102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellsworth WL, Matthews MV, Nadeau RM, Nishenko SP, Reasenberg PA, Simpson RW (1999) A physically based earthquake recurrence model for estimation of long-term earthquake probabilities. US Geol Surv Open File Rep 99–522:23. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1999/0522/ 
  10. Field EH (2015) Computing elastic-rebound-motivated earthquake probabilities in unsegmented fault models: a new methodology supported by physics-based Simulatos. Bull Seismol Soc Am 105:544–559.  https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140094 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Field EH, Dawson TE, Felzer KR, Frankel AD, Gupta V, Jordan TH, Parsons T, Petersen MD, Stein RS, Weldon RJ II, Wills CJ (2009) Uniform California earthquake rupture forecast, version 2 (UCERF 2). Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:2053–2107.  https://doi.org/10.1785/0120080049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Field EH, Biasi GP, Bird P, Dawson TE, Felzer KR, Jackson DD, Johnson KM, Jordan TH, Madden C, Michael AJ, Milner KR, Page MT, Parsons T, Powers PM, Shaw BE, Thatcher WR, Weldon RJ, Zeng Y (2015) Long-term time-dependent probabilities for the third uniform California earthquake rupture forecast (UCERF3). Bull Seismol Soc Am 105:511–543.  https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Floyd MA, Billiris H, Paradissis D, Veis G, Avallone A, Briole P, McClusky S, Nocquet J-M, Palamartchouk K, Parsons B, England PC (2010) A new velocity field for Greece: implications for the kinematics and dynamics of the Aegean. J Geophys Res 115:B10403.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JB007040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frankel A (1995) Mapping seismic hazard in the central and eastern United States. Seismol Res Lett 66:8–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hagiwara Y (1974) Probability of earthquake occurrence as obtained from a Weibull distribution analysis of crustal strain. Tectonophysics 23:318–323Google Scholar
  16. Jackson DD, Aki K, Cornell CA, Dieterich JH, Henyey TL, Mahdyiar M, Schwartz D, Ward SN (1995) Seismic hazard in southern California: probable earthquakes, 1994 to 2024. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85:379–439Google Scholar
  17. Kagan YY, Jackson DD (1991) Long-term earthquake clustering. Geophys J Int 104:117–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kagan YY, Knopoff L (1987) Random stress and earthquake statistics: time dependence. Geoplys J R Astron Soc 88:723–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kreemer C, Chamot-Rooke N, Le Pichon X (2004) Constraints on the evolution and vertical coherency of deformation in the northern Aegean from a comparison of geodetic, geologic and seismologic data. Earth Planet Sci Lett 225(3–4):329–346.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2004.06.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Le Pichon X, Lybéris N, Alvarez F (1987) Discussion on the subsidence of the North Aegean Trough: an alternative view. J Geol Soc 144(2):349–351.  https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.144.2.0349 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lyberis N (1984) Tectonic evolution of the North Aegean trough. In Dixon JE, Robertson AHF (eds) Geological evolution of the Eastern Mediterranean. Special Publication of the Geological Society, London 17:709–25.  https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.144.2.0349
  22. Matthews VM, Ellsworth WL, Reasenberg PA (2002) A Brownian model for recurrent earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:2233–2250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McClusky S, Balassanian S, Barka A, Demir C, Ergintav S, Georgiev I, Gurkan O, Hamburger M, Hurst K, Kahle H, Kastens K, Kekelidze G, King R, Kotzev V, Lenk O, Mahmoud S, Mishin A, Nadariya M, Ouzounis A, Paradissis D, Peter Y, Prilepin M, Reilinger R, Sanli I, Seeger H, Tealeb A, Toksöz MN, Veis G (2000) Global positioning system constraints on plate kinematics and dynamics in the eastern Mediterranean and Caucasus. J Geophys Res 105:5695–5719.  https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JB900351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McNeill LC, Mille A, Minshull TA, Bull JM, Kenyon NH (2004) Extension of the North Anatolian Fault into the North Aegean Trough: evidence for transtension, strain partitioning, and analogues for the Sea of Marmara basin models. Tectonics 23.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2002TC0011490
  25. Müller MD, Geiger A, Kahle H-G, Veis G, Billiris H, Paradissis D, Felekis S (2013) Velocity and deformation fields in the North Aegean domain, Greece, and implications for fault kinematics, derived from GPS data 19932009. Tectonophysics 597–598:34–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2012.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Murru M, Akinci A, Falcone G, Pucci S, Console R, Parsons T (2016) M ≥ 7 earthquake rupture forecast and time dependent probability for the sea of Marmara region, Turkey. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 121:2679–2707.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB012595 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nishenko S, Buland R (1987) A generic recurrence interval distribution for earthquake forecasting. Bull Seismol Soc Am 77:1382–1389Google Scholar
  28. Papadimitriou EE, Sykes LR (2001) Evolution of the stress field in north Aegean Sea (Greece). Geophys J Int 146:747–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Papanikolaou D, Alexandri M, Nomikou P, Ballas D (2002) Morphotectonic structure of the western part of the North Aegean Basin based on swath bathymetry. Mar Geol 190:465–492.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-3227(02)00359-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Papanikolaou D, Alexandri M, Nomikou P (2006) Active faulting in the north Aegean basin. In Dilek Y, Pavlides S (eds) Postcollisional tectonics and magmatism in the Mediterranean region and Asia, Geological Society of America Special Paper 409:189–209.  https://doi.org/10.1130/2006.2409(11)
  31. Papazachos BC, Papazachou CC (2003) The earthquakes of Greece, Ziti Publications, 304 ppGoogle Scholar
  32. Papazachos BC, Papadimitriou EE, Karakaisis GF, Panagiotopoulos DG (1997a) Long-term earthquake prediction in the Circum-Pacific Convergent Belt. Pure Appl Geophys 149:173–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Papazachos BC, Kiratzi AA, Karacostas BG (1997b) Toward a homogeneous moment—magnitude determination for earthquakes in Greece and the surrounding area. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87:474–483Google Scholar
  34. Papazachos BC, Papadimitriou EE, Kiratzi AA, Papazachos CB, Louvari EK (1998) Fault plane solutions in the Aegean Sea and the surrounding area and their tectonic implications. Boll Geofis Teor Appl 39:199–218Google Scholar
  35. Parsons T (2004) Recalculated probability of 푀 ≥ 7 earthquakes beneath the Sea of Marmara, Turkey. J Geophys Res 109:B05304.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JB002667 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Parsons T (2008) Monte Carlo method for determining earthquake recurrence parameters from short paleoseismic catalogs: example calculations for California. J Geophys Res 113:B03302.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB004998 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parsons T, Console R, Falcone G, Murru M, Yamashina K (2012) Comparison of characteristic and Gutenberg-Richter models for time-dependent 푀 ≥ 7.9 earthquake probability in the Nankai-Tokai subduction zone, Japan. Geophys J Int 190:1673–1688.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365246X.2012.05595.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Permanent Regional Seismological Network (1981) operated by the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.  https://doi.org/10.7914/SN/HT
  39. Reid HF (1911) The elastic-rebound theory of earthquakes. Univ Calif Pub Bull Dept Geol Sci 6:413–444Google Scholar
  40. Reilinger R, McClusky S, Paradissis D, Ergintav S, Vernant P (2010) Geodetic constraints on the tectonic evolution of the Aegean region and strain accumulation along the Hellenic subduction zone. Tectonophysics 488(1–4):22–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2009.05.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rikitake T (1976) Recurrence of great earthquakes at subduction zones. Tectonophysics 35:335–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schwartz DP, Coppersmith KJ (1984) Fault behavior and characteristic earthquakes: examples from Wasatch and San Andreas fault zones. J Geophys Res 89:5681–5698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shimazaki K, Nakata T (1980) Time-predictable recurrence model for large earthquakes. Geophys Res Lett 7:279–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stephens MA (1986) Tests based on EDF statistics. In: D’Agostino RB, Stephens MA (eds) Goodness-of-fit techniques. Marcel Dekker, New York 576 ppGoogle Scholar
  45. Taymaz T, Jackson J, McKenzie D (1991) Active tectonics of the north and central Aegean Sea. Geophys J Int 106(2):433–490.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1991.tb03906.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Visini F, Pace B (2014) Insights on a key parameter of earthquake forecasting, the coefficient of variation of the recurrence time, using a simple earthquake simulator. Seismol Res Lett 85:703–713.  https://doi.org/10.1785/0220130165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wessel P, Smith WHF (1998) New, improved version of the generic mapping tools released. Trans Am Geophys Union 79:579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wiemer S, Wyss M (2000) Minimum magnitude of completeness in earthquake catalogs: examples from Alaska, the western United States, and Japan. Bull Seismol Soc Am 90:859–869.  https://doi.org/10.1785/0119990114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yaltirak C, Alpar B (2002) Kinematics and evolution of the northern branch of the North Anatolian Fault (Ganos Fault) between the Sea of Marmara and the Gulf of Saros. Mar Geol 190:351–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhuang J, Harte D, Werner MJ, Hainzl S, Zhou S (2012) Basic models of seismicity: temporal models. Community online resource for statistical seismicity analysis.  https://doi.org/10.5078/corssa-79905851

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018
corrected publication June 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christos Kourouklas
    • 1
  • Eleftheria Papadimitriou
    • 1
  • George Tsaklidis
    • 2
  • Vassilios Karakostas
    • 1
  1. 1.Geophysics DepartmentAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.Statistics and Operational Research Department, School of MathematicsAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations