Skip to main content
Log in

BARENTS16: a 1-D velocity model for the western Barents Sea

  • Published:
Journal of Seismology Aims and scope Submit manuscript


A minimum 1-D seismic velocity model for routine seismic event location purposes was determined for the area of the western Barents Sea, using a modified version of the VELEST code. The resulting model, BARENTS16, and corresponding station corrections were produced using data from stations at regional distances, the vast majority located in the periphery of the recorded seismic activity, due to the unfavorable land–sea distribution. Recorded seismicity is approached through the listings of a joint bulletin, resulting from the merging of several international and regional bulletins for the region, as well as additional parametric data from temporary deployments. We discuss the challenges posed by this extreme network-seismicity geometry in terms of velocity estimation resolution and result stability. Although the conditions do not facilitate the estimation of meaningful station corrections at the farthermost stations, and even well-resolved corrections do not have a convincing contribution, we show that the process can still converge to a stable velocity average for the crust and upper mantle, in good agreement with a priori information about the regional structure and geology, which reduces adequately errors in event location estimates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others


  • Bird P (2003) An updated digital model of plate boundaries. Geochem Geophys Geosyst.

  • Czuba W, Grad M, Mjelde R, Guterch A, Libak A, Krüger F, Murai Y, Schweitzer J, IPY Project Group (2011) Continent-ocean transition across a trans-tensional margin segment: off Bear Island, Barents Sea. Geophys J Int 184:541–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eken T, Shomali ZH, Roberts R, Bödvarsson R (2007) Upper mantle structure of the Baltic Shield below the Swedish National Seismological Network (SNSN) resolved by teleseismic tomography. Geophys J Int 169:617–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eken T, Shomali ZH, Roberts R, Hieronymus CF, Bodvarsson R (2008) S and P velocity heterogeneities within the upper mantle below the Baltic Shield. Tectonophysics 462:109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grad M, Tiira T, ESC Working Group (2009) The Moho depth map of the European plate. Geophys J Int 176:279–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslinger F (1998) Velocity structure, seismicity and seismotectonics of Northwestern Greece between the Gulf of Arta and Zakynthos. Dissertation, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zürich

  • Hauser J, Dyer KM, Pasyanos ME, Bungum H, Faleide JI, Clarck SA, Schweitzer J (2011) A probabilistic seismic model for the European Arctic. J Geophys Res 116:B01303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havskov J, Bormann P, Schweitzer J (2012) IS11.1: seismic source location. In: Bormann P (ed) New Manual of Seismological Observatory Practice 2 (NMSOP-2), IASPEI. GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, pp 1–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hejrani B, Balling N, Jacobsen BH, England R (2017) Upper-mantle velocities below the Scandinavian Mountains from P- and S-wave traveltime tomography. Geophys J Int 208:177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks E, Kværna T, Mykkeltveit S, Schweitzer J, Ringdal F (2004) Travel-times and attenuation relations for regional phases in the Barents Sea region. Pure Appl Geophys 161:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Seismological Centre (2014) On-line bulletin,, Internatl. Seismol. Cent., Thatcham, United Kingdom. Accessed 17 August 2017

  • Jakobsson M, Mayer LA, Coakley B, Dowdeswell JA, Forbes S, Fridman B, Hodnesdal H, Noormets R, Pedersen R, Rebesco M, Schenke H-W, Zarayskaya Y, Accettella D, Armstrong A, Anderson RM, Bienhoff P, Camerlenghi A, Church I, Edwards M, Gardner JV, Hall JK, Hell B, Hestvik OB, Kristoffersen Y, Marcussen C, Mohammad R, Mosher D, Nghiem SV, Pedrosa MT, Travaglini PG, Weatherall P (2012) The International Bathymetric Chart of the Arctic Ocean (IBCAO) version 3.0. Geophys Res Lett.

  • Junek WN, Kværna T, Pirli M, Schweitzer J, Harris DB, Dodge DA, Woods MT (2014) Inferring aftershock sequence properties and tectonic structure using empirical signal detectors. Pure Appl Geophys.

  • Kennett BLN, Engdahl ER, Buland R (1995) Constraints on seismic velocities in the Earth from travel times. Geophys J Int 122:108–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kissling E (1988) Geotomography with local earthquake data. Rev Geophys 26:659–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kissling E (1995) Program VELEST user’s guide—short introduction, Institute of Geophysics, ETH Zürich, Accessed 17 August 2017

  • Kissling E, Ellsworth WL, Eberhart-Phillips D, Kradolfer U (1994) Initial reference models in earthquake tomography. J Geophys Res 99(B10):19635–19646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klitzke P, Faleide JI, Scheck-Wenderoth M, Sippel J (2015) A lithosphere-scale structural model of the Barents Sea and Kara Sea region. Solid Earth 6:153–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levshin A, Schweitzer J, Weidle C, Shapiro N, Ritzwoller M (2007) Surface wave tomography of the Barents Sea and surrounding regions. Geophys J Int 170:441–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morozov AN, Vaganova NV, Konechnaya YV, Asming VE (2015) New data about seismicity and crustal velocity structure of the “continent-ocean” transition zone of the Barents-Kara region in the Arctic. J Seismol 19(1):219–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller G (1977) Earth flattening approximation for body waves derived from geometric ray theory—improvements, corrections and range of applicability. J Geophys 42:429–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Mykkeltveit S, Ringdal F (1981) Phase identification and event location at regional distance using small-aperture array data. In: Husebye ES, Mykkeltveit S (eds) Identification of seismic sources—earthquake or underground explosion, NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series (Series C – Mathematical and Physical Sciences), vol 74. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 467–481. 

  • Pirli M, Schweitzer J, Ottemöller L, Raeesi M, Mjelde R, Atakan K, Guterch A, Gibbons SJ, Paulsen B, Dębski W, Wiejacz P, Kværna T (2010) Preliminary analysis of the 21 February 2008, Svalbard (Norway), seismic sequence. Seismol Res Lett 81:63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirli M, Schweitzer J, the IPY Project Consortium (2011) The International Polar Year (IPY) broadband ocean-bottom seismograph deployment: observations, limitations and integration with the IPY land network. NORSAR Sci Rep 2-2011:51–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirli M, Schweitzer J, Paulsen B (2013) The Storfjorden, Svalbard, 2008-2012 aftershock sequence: seismotectonics in a polar environment. Tectonophysics 601:192–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzmann O, Maercklin N, Faleide JI, Bungum H, Mooney WD, Detweiler ST (2007) A 3D geophysical model for the crust in the greater Barents Sea region: database compilation, model construction and basement characterization. Geophys J Int 170:417–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer J (2001) HYPOSAT—an enhanced routine to locate seismic events. Pure Appl Geophys 158:277–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer J (2011) The dynamic continental margin between the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and Bjørnøya (Bear Island). In: Orheim O, Ulstein K (eds) The Norwegian Contribution (International Polar Year 2007-2008). The Research Council of Norway, Oslo, pp 168–172 ISBN:978-82-12-02901-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer J, Kennett BLN (2007) Comparison of location procedures: the Kara Sea event of 16 August 1997. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97:389–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer J, Antonovskaya G, Joint Norwegian-Russian Project GEOPROC Consortium (2017) The project “Seismological research related to geophysical processes in the European Arctic (GEOPROC)” and “Recommendations for future Norwegian-Russian geophysical cooperation in the European Arctic”. NORSAR Annual Sci Rep 2016 (in print)

  • Silvennoinen H, Kozlovskaya E, Kissling E, Kosarev G, the POLENET/LAPNET Working Group (2014) A new Moho boundary map for the northern Fennoscandian Shield based on combined controlled-source seismic and receiver function data. Geo Res J 1-2:19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smelror M, Petrov OV, Larssen GB, Werner SC (2009) ATLAS. Geological history of the Barents Sea. Geological Survey of Norway, Trondheim, Accessed 17 August 2017

  • Stange S, Schweitzer J (2004) Source depths at regional distances: an example from the western Barents Sea/Svalbard region. NORSAR Sci Rep 1-2004:45–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Thybo H, Balling N, Maupin V, Ritter J, Tilmann F (2012) ScanArray Core (1G 2012-2017). The ScanArray consortium. Other/Seism Netw.

  • Tukey JW (1977) Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, pp xvi+688

  • Wessel P, Smith WHF (1998) New, improved version of Generic Mapping Tools released. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 79(47):579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilde-Piórko M (2015) Crustal and upper mantle seismic structure of the Svalbard Archipelago from the receiver function analysis. Polish Polar Res 36:89–107.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


Steven Gibbons provided phase readings for a collection of seismic events in northern Norway, as well as phase readings from stations on Greenland for events in the European Arctic that were relocated within an AFRL contract. Ilma Janutyté provided phase readings from events in Finnmark from temporary deployments realized within the international initiative ScanArray (Thybo et al. 2012). The Arkhangelsk seismic bulletin was provided by Yana Konechnaya and readings from the KRSC station AMD by Andrey Fedorov, within the GEOPROC project co-financed by the Research Council of Norway (project no. 233973) and the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 14-05-93080). Maps were constructed using the Generic Mapping Tools software (e.g., Wessel and Smith 1998). Bathymetry in Figs. 1a, b, 7, and 8 is shown using the IBCAO grid (Jakobsson et al. 2012), and the mid-ocean ridge system in Figs. 1c and 5a, b is traced using the plate boundaries of Bird (2003). The manuscript benefited from the comments of two anonymous reviewers.

Funding information

This research was financed by Aker BP ASA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Myrto Pirli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pirli, M., Schweitzer, J. BARENTS16: a 1-D velocity model for the western Barents Sea. J Seismol 22, 69–81 (2018).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: