Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An evaluation of earthquake hazard parameters in the Iranian Plateau based on the Gumbel III distribution

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Seismology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The Gumbel’s third asymptotic distribution (GIII) of the extreme value method is employed to evaluate the earthquake hazard parameters in the Iranian Plateau. This research quantifies spatial mapping of earthquake hazard parameters like annual and 100-year mode beside their 90 % probability of not being exceeded (NBE) in the Iranian Plateau. Therefore, we used a homogeneous and complete earthquake catalogue during the period 1900–2013 with magnitude M w  4.0, and the Iranian Plateau is separated into equal area mesh of 1° late × 1° long. The estimated result of annual mode with 90 % probability of NBE is expected to exceed the values of M w 6.0 in the Eastern part of Makran, most parts of Central and East Iran, Kopeh Dagh, Alborz, Azerbaijan, and SE Zagros. The 100-year mode with 90 % probability of NBE is expected to overpass the value of M w 7.0 in the Eastern part of Makran, Central and East Iran, Alborz, Kopeh Dagh, and Azerbaijan. The spatial distribution of 100-year mode with 90 % probability of NBE uncovers the high values of earthquake hazard parameters which are frequently connected with the main tectonic regimes of the studied area. It appears that there is a close communication among the seismicity and the tectonics of the region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agard P, Omrani J, Jolivet L, Whitechurch H, Vrielynck B, Spakman W, Monié P, Meyer B, Wortel R (2011) Zagros orogeny: a subduction-dominated process. Geol Magz 1-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S001675681100046X

  • Allen M, Vincent S, Alsop G, Ismail-zadeh A, Flecker R (2003) Late Cenozoic deformation in the South Caspian region: effects of a rigid basement block within a collision zone. Tectonophysics 366:223–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys NN, Melville CP (1982) A history of Persian earthquakes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayrak Y, Ozturk S, Cinar H, Koravos GC, Tsapanos TM (2008) Regional variation of the ω-upper bound magnitude of GIII distribution in and around turkey: tectonic implications for earthquake hazards. Pure Appl Geophys 165:1367–1390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berberian M (1983) Continental deformation in the Iranian plateau. Contribution to the seismotectonics of Iran, part IV. Geological Survey of Iran, report No. 52

  • Berberian M (1994) Natural hazards and the first earthquake catalogue of Iran, historical hazard in Iran prior to 1900. Int Inst Earthq Eng Seismol (IIEES) 1:620

    Google Scholar 

  • Berberian M (1995) Master blind thrust faults hidden under the Zagros folds: active basement 515 tectonics and surface morphotectonics. Tectonophysics 241:193–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berberian M (2014) Earthquake and coseismic surface faulting on the Iranian Plateau; a historical, social, and physical approach. 1st Edition, Elsevier, Publishing June 2014, ISBN :9780444632920, 770pp

  • Berberian M, Yeats RS (1999) Patterns of historical earthquake rupture in the Iranian Plateau. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89:120–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton PW (1977) The application of extreme value statistics to seismic hazard assessments in the European area. Proc. Symp. Analysis and on Seismic Risk, Liblice, 17–22 October 1977

  • Burton PW (1979) Seismic risk in southern Europe through to India examined using Gumbel’s third distribution of extreme values. Geophys J R Astro Soc 59:249–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton PW, Makropoulos KC (1985) Seismic risk of circum-Pacific earthquakes: II. Extreme values using Gumbel’s third distribution and the relationship with strain energy release. Pure Appl Geophys 123:849–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton PW, McGonigle R, Makropoulos KC, Üçer SB (1984) Seismic risk in Turkey, the Aegean and eastern Mediterranean: the occurrence of large magnitude earthquakes. Geophys J R Astron Soc 78(2):475–506. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246×.1984.tb01961.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton WP, Qin C, Tselentis GA, Sokos E (2004) Extreme earthquake and earthquake perceptibility study in Greece and its surrounding area. Nat Hazards 32:277–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dargahi Noubary GR (2002) The use of modern statistical theories in the assessment of earthquake hazard, with application to quiet regions of eastern North America. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22:361–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djamour Y, Vernant P, Nankali H, Tavakoli F (2011) NW Iran-eastern Turkey present-day kinematics: results from the Iranian permanent GPS network. Earth Planet Sci Lett 307:27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engdahl ER, Jackson J, Myers SC, Bergman EA, Priestley K (2006) Relocation and assessment of seismicity in the Iran region. Geophys J Int 167:761–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein B, Lomnitz C (1966) A model for the occurrence of large earthquakes. Nature 211:954–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gringorten II (1963) A plotting rule for extreme probabilistic paper. J Geophys Res 68:813–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumbel E (1958) Statistics of extremes. Columbia University Press, New York, p 375

    Google Scholar 

  • Hessami K, Jamali F (2006) Explanatory notes to the map of major active faults of Iran. J Seismol Earthq Eng 8(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Hessami K, Jamali F, Tabasi H (2003) Major active fault of Iran. 1:2,500,000, Tehran, Int Ins Earthq Eng Seismol

  • Jackson JA (1992) Partitioning of strike-slip and convergent motion between Eurasia and Arabia in eastern Turkey and Caucasus. J Geophys Res 97:12471–12479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson JA, McKenzie DP (1984) Active tectonics of the Alpine-Himalayan belt between western Turkey and Pakistan. J Geophys Res Astron Soc 77(1):185–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson JA, Haines AJ, Holt WE (1995) The accommodation of Arabia–Eurasia plate convergence in Iran. J Geophys Res 100(15):205–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson J, Priestley K, Allen M, Berberian M (2002) Active tectonics of the South Caspian Basin. Geophys J Int 148(2):214–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob KH, Quittmeyer RC (1979) The Makran region of Pakistan and Iran: 431 trench-arc system with active plate subduction. In: Farah A, De Jong, K.A (Eds.) Geodynamics of Pakistan. Geol. Surv. Pakistan, Quetta, pp. 305 ± 315

  • Karimiparidari S, Zaré M, Memarian H, Kijko A (2013) Iranian earthquakes, a homogeneous catalogue with moment magnitudes: 3rd Millennium BC to 2010 J Seismol 10.1007/s10950-013-9360-9

  • Kijko A, Sellevoll MA (1989) Estimation of earthquake hazard parameters from incomplete data files. Part I: utilization of extreme and complete catalogs with different threshold magnitude. Bull Seismol Soc Am 79(3):645–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Kijko A, Sellevoll MA (1992) Estimation of earthquake hazard parameters from incomplete data files. Part II. Incorporation of magnitude heterogeneity. Bull Seismol Soc Am 82(1):120–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Makropoulos KC (1978) The statistics of large earthquake magnitude and an evaluation of Greek seismicity, Ph.D. Thesis, Edinburgh University

  • Makropoulos KC, Burton WP (1985) Seismic hazard in Greece II ground acceleration. Tectonophysics 117:259–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makropoulos KC, Burton PW (1986) HAZAN: a Fortran program to evaluate seismic hazard parameters using Gumbel’s theory of extreme statistics. Comput Geosci 12(1):29–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirzaei N, Gao M, Chen YT (1997) Seismic source regionalization for seismic zoning of Iran: major seismotectonic provinces. J Earthq Pred Res 7:465–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirzaei N, Gao M, Chen YT (1998) Seismic source regionalization for seismic zoning of Iran: major seismotectonic provinces. J Earthq Pred Res 7:465–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirzaei N, Gao M, Chen YT (1999) Delineation of potential seismic sources for seismic zoning of Iran. J Seismol 3:17–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordquist JM (1945) Theory of largest values applied to earthquake magnitudes. Transactions Am Geophys Union 26(1):29–31. doi:10.1029/TR026i001p00029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowroozi AA (1972) Focal mechanism of earthquakes in Persia, Turkey, West Pakistan and Afghanistan and plate tectonics of the Middle East. Bull Seismol Soc Am 62(3):823–850

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowroozi AA, Ahmadi G (1986) Analysis of earthquake risk I Iran based on seismotectonic provinces. Tectonophysics 122:89–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul A, Hatzfeld D, Kaviani A, Tatar M, Pequegnat C (2010) Seismic imaging of the lithospheric structure of the Zagros mountain belt (Iran). In: Leturmy P, Robin C (eds) Tectonic and stratigraphic evolution of Zagros and Makran during the Mesozoic–Cenozoic: geological society, 330th edn. Special Publications, London, pp 5–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Peyret M, Rolandone F, Dominguez S, Djamour Y, Meyer B (2008) Source model for the Mw 6.1, 31 March 2006, Chalan-Chulan Earthquake (Iran) from InSAR. Terra Nov. 20(2):126–133. doi:10.1111/j.1365-121.2008.00797.x

  • Reilinger RE, Mcclusky SC, Vernant P, Lawrence S, Ergintav Sakmak R, Nadariya M, Hahubia G, Mahmoud S, Sakr K, Arrajehi A, Paradissis D, Al-Aydrus A, Prilepin M, Guseva T, Evren E, Dmitritsa A, Filikov SV, Gomes F, Al-Ghazzi R, Karam G (2006) GPS constraints on continental deformation in the Africa–Arabia–Eurasia continental collision zone and implications for the dynamics of plate interactions. J Geophys Res 111:V05411. doi:10.1029/2005JB004051

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritz JF, Nazari H, Ghassemi A, Salamati R, Shafei A, Solaymani S, Vernant P (2006) Active transtension inside central Alborz: a new insight into northern Iran–Southern Caspian geodynamics. Geology 34(6):477–480. doi:10.1130/G22319.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schenkova Z, Kamik V (1976) Application of the largest values theory to Balkan earthquakes. Proc Sem Seism Zon Maps Skopje 1975(1):193–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Shabanian E, Siame L, Bellier O, Benedetti L, Abbassi MR (2009) Quaternary slip rates along the northeast boundary of the Arabia-Eurasia collision zone (Kopeh Dagh Mountains, north-east Iran). Geophys J Int 178:1055–1077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talebian M, Jackson JA (2004) A reappraisal of earthquake local mechanisms and active shortening in the Zagros mountain of Iran. Geophys J Int 156:506–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavakoli B (1996) Major seismotectonic provinces of Iran. Int Ins Earthq Eng Seismol (IIEES), Tehran, Iran (in Persian)

  • Tavakoli B, Ghafory-Ashtiany M (1999) Seismic hazard assessment of Iran, Ann. Geofis., 42, pp. 1013–1021 The Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program (GSHAP) 1992–1999

  • Tsapanos TM (1990) b-values of two tectonic parts in the circum-Pacific belt. Pure Appl Geophys 134(2):229–242. doi:10.1007/BF00876999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsapanos TM (1997) Regional variation of the ω values in the circum-Pacific belt. Pure Appl Geophys 150:113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsapanos TM (1998) Seismic hazard for some regions of the world examined using strain energy release. J Balk Geophys Soc 1:19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsapanos TM, Burton PW (1991) Seismic hazard evaluation for specific seismic regions of the world. Tectonophysics 194:153–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsapanos TM, Bayrak Y, Çınar H, Koravos GCH, Bayrak E, Kalogirou EE, Tsapanou AV, Vougiouka GE (2013) Analysis of largest earthquakes in Turkey and its vicinity by application of the Gumbel III distribution. Acta Geophys. doi:10.2478/s11600-013-0155-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhrhammer RA (1986) Characteristics of northern and central California seismicity. Earthq Notes 57(1):21 (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernant P, Nilforoushan F, Hatzfeld D, Abbassi M, Vigny C, Masson F, Nankali H, Martinod J, Ashtiani M, Bayer R, Tavakoli F, Che′ry J (2004) Present-day crustal deformation and plate kinematics in the Middle East constrained by GPS measurements in Iran and northern Oman. Geophys J Int 157:381–398. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246×.2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav RBS, Bayrak, Tripathi JN, Chopra S, Bayrak E (2012) Regional variation of the ω-upper bound magnitude of GIII distribution in Hindukush–Pamir Himalaya and the adjacent regions: a perspective on earthquake hazard. Tectonophysics 544– 545, 1–12

  • Yadav RBS, Tsapanos TM, Koravos GCH, Bayrak Y, Devlioti KD (2013) Spatial mapping of earthquake hazard parameters in the Hindukush–Pamir Himalaya and adjacent regions: implication for future seismic hazard. J Asian Earth Sci 70–71(2013):115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazdani A, Kowsari M (2012) Bayesian estimation of seismic hazards in Iran. Scientia Iranica A 20(3):422–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Yegulalp TM, Kuo JT (1974) Statistical prediction of the occurrence of maximum magnitude earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 64(2):393–414

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Dr. Andrzej Kijko, Associate Editor of the Journal of Seismology, and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions which enhanced the quality of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiwa Mohammadi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohammadi, H., Bayrak, Y. An evaluation of earthquake hazard parameters in the Iranian Plateau based on the Gumbel III distribution. J Seismol 20, 615–628 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-015-9547-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-015-9547-3

Keywords

Navigation