Abstract
We present laboratory tests for two types of rotational motion sensors, the liquid-based rotational seismometers type R1 and type R2 manufactured by Eentec and the closed loop fiber optic gyroscope LCG-Demonstrator by Northrop Grumman LITEF. All instruments were calibrated absolutely at different temperatures, characterization and quantification of self-noise was carried out, and a comparison with the ring laser gyroscope G from the Geodetic Observatory in Wettzell, Germany is drawn. The generator constant of the R1 varies up to 27% in the nominal operating temperature range. In the closed-loop system LCG-Demonstrator, the compensation for temperature variation works very well, and the generator constant can be seen as constant within the error bars. For both instrument types, we measured sensitivities in the order of 10 − 7 rad/s in a period range from 10 to 100 s. While this sensitivity is already sufficient for civil engineering applications, it has to be improved by at least 1 order of magnitude for applications in weak motion seismology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allan DW (1966) Statistics of atomic frequency standards. Proc IEEE 54:221–230
Barnes JA (1970) Characterization of frequency stability. National Bureau of Standards Technical Note 394. http://tf.boulder.nist.gov/general/pdf/264.pdf
Beyreuther M, Barsch R, Krischer L, Megies T, Behr Y, Wassermann J (2010) Obspy: a python toolbox for seismology. Seismol Res Lett 81:530–533. doi:10.1785/gssrl.81.3.530
Cochard A, Igel H, Schuberth B, Suryanto W, Velikoseltsev A, Schreiber U, Wassermann J, Scherbaum F, Vollmer D (2006) Rotational motions in seismology: theory, observation, simulation. Springer, New York, pp 391–411
Eentec (2006) Electrochemical sensor transducers. http://www.eentec.com/pdf/ELECTROCHEMICA-1.pdf
Evans JR, Followill F, Hutt CR, Kromer RP, Nigbor RL, Ringler AT, Steim JM, Wielandt E (2010) Method for calculating self-noise spectra and operating ranges for seismographic inertial sensors and recorders. Seismol Res Lett 81(4):640–646. doi:10.1785/gssrl.81.4.640
Graizer V (2006) Tilts in strong ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96(6):2090–2102. doi:10.1785/0120060065
Graizer V (2010) Strong motion recordings and residual displacements: what are we actually recording in strong motion seismology? Seismol Res Lett 81(4):635–639. doi:10.1785/gssrl.81.4.635
Igel H, Schreiber U, Flaws A, Schuberth B, Velikoseltsev A, Cochard A (2005) Rotational motions induced by the M8.1 Tokachi-Oki earthquake. Geophys Res Lett 32:1–5. doi:10.1029/2004GL022336
Lin CJ, Liu CC, Lee WHK (2009) Recording rotational and translational ground motions of two TAIGER explosions in northeastern Taiwan on 4 March 2008. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99(2B):1237–1250. doi:10.1785/0120080176
Megies T, Beyreuther M, Barsch R, Krischer L, Wassermann J (2011) Obspy what can it do for data centers and observatories? Ann Geophys 54(1):47–58
Nigbor RL, Evans JR, Hutt CR (2009) Laboratory and field testing of commercial rotational seismometers. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99(2):1215–1227. doi:10.1785/0120080247
Schreiber KU, Hautmann JN, Velikoseltsev A, Wassermann J, Igel H, Otero J, Vernon F, Wells JPR (2009a) Ring laser measurements of ground rotations for seismology. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99(2B):1190–1198. doi:10.1785/0120080171
Schreiber KU, Velikoseltsev A, Carr AJ, Franco-Anaya R (2009b) The application of fiber optic gyroscopes for the measurement of rotations in structural engineering. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99(2B):1207–1214. doi:10.1785/0120080086
Sleeman R (2006) Three-channel correlation analysis: a new technique to measure instrumental noise of digitizers and seismic sensors. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96(1):258–271. doi:10.1785/0120050032
Welch PD (1967) The use of fast fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: a method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms. IEEE Trans Audio Electroacoust AU-15:70–73
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the editor of this special issue, J. R. Evans, and our two reviewers whose comments were very helpful. We would also like to thank the team of Northrop Grumman LITEF for their efficient cooperation and C. Sens-Schoenfelder for making the R2 available. This work was partially funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft in the project number Ig16/8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bernauer, F., Wassermann, J. & Igel, H. Rotational sensors—a comparison of different sensor types. J Seismol 16, 595–602 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-012-9286-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-012-9286-7