Skip to main content
Log in

A detailed analysis of cross-phase modulation effects on OOK and dpsk optical WDM transmission systems in the presence of GVD, SPM, and ASE noise

  • Published:
Journal of Russian Laser Research Aims and scope

Abstract

A performance analysis is carried out to evaluate the effect of cross-phase modulation (XPM) on a dispersion-managed 20 Gb/s optical wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM) transmission system using either the on-off keying (OOK) or the different-phase-shifting keying (DPSK) modulation, in the presence of the group-velocity dispersion (GVD), self-phase modulation (SPM), and amplified spontaneous emission (ASE). It is found that to achieve a bit error rate (BER) of 10−9 at a distance of 160 km, a 1.0 dB XPM power penalty is incurred for input channel power of 3 dBm in the OOK transmission and 7 dBm in the DPSK transmission. The power penalty increases with input channel powers and is inversely proportional and exhibits oscillations with respect to the channel separation. The oscillation is evenly spaced for the DPSK but not for the OOK and suggests the presence of optimum separation values. The XPM penalty decreases when a high dispersion fiber is used and increases linearly with increasing dispersion slope. Small residual dispersion can reduce the penalty of nonlinear effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. F. Elrefaie, R. E. Wagner, D. A. Atlas, and D. G. Daut, J. Lightwave Technol., 6, 704 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. A. F. Elrefaie and R. E. Wagner, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., 3, 71 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. E. Iannone, F. S. Locati, F. Matera, et al., J. Lightwave Technol., 11, 1478 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. J. P. Hamaide and J. M. Gabriagues, Electron. Lett., 26, 1451 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. F. M. Abbou, H. T. Chuah, S. P. Majumder, and A. Abid, IEICE Electron Express, 3, 203 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics, 2nd ed., Academic Press, San Diego, CA (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. K. Chiang, N. Kagi, M. E. Marhic, and L. G. Kazovsky, J. Lightwave Technol., 14, 249 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. A. V. T. Cartaxo, J. Lightwave Technol., 17, 178 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. R. I. Killey, H. J. Thiele, V. Mikhailov, and P. Bavyel, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., 12, 804 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. E. Marhic, N. Kagi, T. K. Chiang, and L. G. Kazovsky, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., 8, 145 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Sahara, H. Kubota, and M. Nakazawa, Electron. Lett., 32, 915 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. O. Vassilieva, T. Hoshida, S. Choudhary, et al., “Numerical comparison of NRZ, CS-RZ, and IM-DPSK formats in 43 Gbits/s WDM transmission,” in: Proceedings of the 14th LEOS (Lasers and Electro-Optics Society) Annual Meeting (November 2001), IEEE, 2, 634 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. M. Abbou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abbou, F.M., Hiew, C.C., Chuah, H.T. et al. A detailed analysis of cross-phase modulation effects on OOK and dpsk optical WDM transmission systems in the presence of GVD, SPM, and ASE noise. J Russ Laser Res 29, 57–70 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10946-008-0005-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10946-008-0005-3

Keywords

Navigation