Abstract
The well-known Heisenberg’s uncertainty relation is an inequality between uncertainties of canonically conjugate observables in a given state. In this interpretation, the Heisenberg’s uncertainty relation is a rigorous mathematical theorem and is, therefore, always valid. However, the same inequality is often applied in the situation of measurement, where it is illustrated in a quite different way. The uncertainty relation is then an inequality connecting the precision (resolution) of the measurement of one observable and the uncertainty of the conjugate observable in the state arising after the measurement. It turns out that in such an interpretation the Heisenberg’s inequality may be violated for some measurement readouts that emerge with small but finite probabilities. Making use of the uncertainties averaged in a special way over all possible measurement readouts, one may formulate an inequality of the type of Heisenberg’s inequality but valid for any measurement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. B. Mensky, Quantum Measurements and Decoherence. Models and Phenomenology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston & London (2000) [Russian translation: Moscow, Fizmatlit (2001)].
D. Bohm, Quantum Theory, Prentice-Hall, New York (1952).
P. A. M. Dirac, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, Fourth Edition, Clarendon Press, Oxford (1958).
L. I. Mandelstam, Lections on Optics, Relativity and Quantum Mechanics [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1972).
L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics. Nonrelativistic Theory, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1987).
A. Messiah, Quantum Mechanics, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam (1970), Vol. I.
V. B. Braginsky and F. Y. Khalili, Quantum Measurement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992).
S. Stenholm, “Simultaneous measurement of conjugate variables,” Ann. Phys., 218, 233–254 (1992).
C. W. Helstrom, Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory, Academic Press, New York (1976).
A. S. Holevo, Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory, North Holland, Amsterdam (1982).
H. Martens, The Uncertainty Principle, PhD Thesis, Eindhoven (1991).
M. Ozawa, “Uncertainty relations for noise and disturbance in generalized quantum measurements,” Ann. Phys., 311, 350–416 (2004).
Yu. I. Vorontsov, “Uncertainty relation and the relation measurement error-perturbation,” Usp. Fiz. Nauk, 175, 1053–1068 2005).
M. O. Scully, B.-G. Englert, and H. Walther, “Quantum optical tests of complementarity,” Nature, 351, 111–116 (1991).
H. Wiseman and F. Harrison, “Uncertainty over complementarity?” Nature, 377, 584 (1995).
B.-G. Englert, M. O. Scully, and H. Walther, “Complementarity and uncertainty,” Nature, 375, 367–368 (1995).
P. Storey, S. Tan, M. Collett, and D. Walls, “Path detection and the uncertainty principle,” Nature, 367, 626–628 (1994).
H. M. Wiseman, F. E. Harrison, M. J. Collett, S. M. Tan, D. F. Walls, and R. B. Killip, “Nonlocal momentum transfer in Welcher-Weg measurements,” Phys. Rev. A, 56, 55–75 (1997).
P. Knight, “Where the weirdness comes from,” Nature, 395, 12–13 (1998).
S. Dürr, T. Nonn, and G. Rempe, “Origin of quantum-mechanical complementarity probed by a ‘which-way’ experiment in an atom interferometer,” Nature, 395, 33–37 (1998).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Paper submitted by the author in English on 28 April 2006.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mensky, M.B. Heisenberg’s uncertainty relation may be violated in a single measurement. J Russ Laser Res 27, 332–340 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10946-006-0017-9
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10946-006-0017-9