Abstract
Individuals may develop different attitudes on bioethics in general and reproductive ethics in particular, due to the effects of different sociocultural environments. Individuals' attitudes toward surrogacy are affected positively or negatively depending on religious and cultural environments. This study was conducted to determine and compare the attitudes of different religions toward surrogacy. This study is cross-sectional and collected from individuals living in Turkey, India, Iran, the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, Madagascar, Nepal, Nigeria, Pakistan, Mexico, England, and Japan between May 2022 and December 2022. The study was conducted with individuals belonging to Islam, Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Atheism. The study was conducted with 1177 individuals from different religions who agreed to participate in the study by snowball sampling method. The introductory Information Form and "Attitude Questionnaire Toward Surrogacy" were used as data collection tools. R programming language 4.1.3 was used for regression analysis with machine learning approach and artificial neural networks, and SPSS-25 was used for other statistical analyses. There was a significant difference between the total mean score of the individuals' Attitudes toward Surrogacy Questionnaire and their religious beliefs (p < 0.05). When the results of the analysis of the regression model with the dummy variable, which was carried out with the aim of revealing the effects of religious belief on the attitude toward surrogacy, are examined, statistical estimates of the regression model show that the model is significant and usable F(4,1172) = 5.005, p = 0.001). It explains 1.7% of the total variance of the level of religious belief's attitude toward surrogacy. In the regression model, when the t-test results regarding the significance of the regression coefficient are examined, among the participants, it was determined that the mean score of those who believed in Islam (t = − 3.827, p < 0.001) and those who believed in Christianity (t = − 2.548, p < 0.001) was lower than the mean score of those who believed in Hinduism (Constant) (p < 0.05). Individuals' attitudes toward surrogacy differ according to their religion. The best performing algorithm for the prediction model was random forest (RF) regression. The contributions of the variables to the model were calculated with Shapley values (Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP)). The SHAP values of the variables in the best performing model were examined to avoid bias in terms of comparison in the performance criterion. SHAP values (Shapley Additive Explanations) show the contribution or importance of each variable in the estimation of the model. It is determined that the most important variable that should be in the model to predict the Attitude Toward Surrogacy Survey variable is the Nationality variable. It is recommended that studies on attitudes toward surrogacy should be conducted by taking religious and cultural values into consideration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alabi, O. J. (2020). Perceptions of surrogacy within the Yoruba Socio-Cultural Context of Ado-Ekiti Nigeria. F1000Research, 9, 103. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.20999.3
Aramesh, K. (2009). Iran’s experience with surrogate motherhood: An Islamic view and ethical concerns. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35(5), 320–322. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2008.027763
Armuand, G., Lampic, C., Skoog-Svanberg, A., Wånggren, K., & Sydsjö, G. (2018). Survey shows that Swedish healthcare professionals have a positive attitude toward surrogacy but the health of the child is a concern. Acta Paediatrica, 107(1), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.14041
Arvidsson, A., Vauquline, P., Johnsdotter, S., & Essén, B. (2017). Surrogate mother–praiseworthy or stigmatized: A qualitative study on perceptions of surrogacy in Assam India. Global Health Action, 10(1), 1328890. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1328890
Aydin, S., & Beji, N. K. (2013). Sexual function in infertile couples and the role of infertility counselor. Journal of Education and Research in Nursing, 10(2), 8–14.
Basbeth, F., Hilmi, R. I., & Qomariyah, R. (2019). Knowledge and attitude toward surrogacy in medical students of Yarsi University and its review in the views of Islam. International Journal of Ethics, Trauma & Victimology, 5(01), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.18099/ijetv.v5i1.5
Baykal, B., Korkmaz, C., Ceyhan, S. T., Goktolga, U., & Baser, I. (2008). Opinions of infertile Turkish women on gamete donation and gestational surrogacy. Fertility and Sterility, 89(4), 817–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.04.022
Brunet, L., King, D., Davaki, K., McCandless, J., Marzo, C., & Carruthers, J. (2012). Comparative study on the regime of surrogacy in the EU member states. European Parliament, Brussels, Belgium. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/51063/
Constantinidis, D., & Cook, R. (2012). Australian perspectives on surrogacy: The influence of cognitions, psychological and demographic characteristics. Human Reproduction, 27(4), 1080–1087. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der470
Deomampo, D. (2015). Defining parents, making citizens: Nationality and citizenship in transnational surrogacy. Medical Anthropology, 34(3), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2014.890195
Deonandan, R. (2020). Thoughts on the ethics of gestational surrogacy: Perspectives from religions, Western liberalism, and comparisons with adoption. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 37(2), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01647-y
Frankford, D. M., Bennington, L. K., & Ryan, J. G. (2015). Womb outsourcing: Commercial surrogacy in India. MCN: the American Journal of Maternal/child Nursing, 40(5), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMC.0000000000000163
Harris, A. (2020). A Magna Carta for Marriage: Love, Catholic Masculinities and the Humanae Vitae Contraception Crisis in 1968 Britain. Cultural and Social History, 17(3), 407–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780038.2019.1640022
Kalra, B., Baruah, M. P., & Kalra, S. (2016). The Mahabharata and reproductive endocrinology. Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 20(3), 404–407. https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.180004
Kian, F. R., Zandi, A., Samani, R. O., Maroufizadeh, S., & Mehran, A. (2016). Development and validation of attitude toward gestational surrogacy scale in Iranian infertile couples. International Journal of Fertility & Sterility, 10(1), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2016.4776
Kılıç, S., Uçar, M., Türker, T., Koçak, N., Aydın, G., Günay, A., & Gençtürk, D. (2009). GATA Hemşirelik Yüksek Okulu öğrencilerinde taşıyıcı anneliğe yönelik tutumun belirlenmesi. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, 51(4), 216–219.
Kuş, Ö., & Özbek Güven, G. (2021). An ethical evaluation of surrogacy, which has become widespread with reproductive tourism. Turkish Journal of Bioethics, 8(2), 126–133. https://doi.org/10.5505/tjob.2021.03274
Lones, M. E. (2016). A Christian ethical perspective on surrogacy. Bioethics in Faith and Practice, 2(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.15385/jbfp.2016.2.1.5
Minai, J., Suzuki, K., Takeda, Y., Hoshi, K., & Yamagata, Z. (2007). There are gender differences in attitudes toward surrogacy when information on this technique is provided. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 132(2), 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.08.016
Muhammed, M. (2020). Human rights and religion: Islam in perspective. Lectio Socialis, 5(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.47478/lectio.788811
Mustafa, A. G., Alzoubi, K. H., Khabour, O. F., & Alfaqih, M. A. (2018). Perspectives and attitudes of Jordanian medical and paramedical students toward surrogate pregnancy. International Journal of Women’s Health, 10, 617–622. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S184434
Nakazawa, A., Hirata, T., Arakawa, T., Nagashima, N., Fukuda, S., Neriishi, K., Harada, M., Hirota, Y., Koga, K., & Wada-Hiraike, O. (2019). A survey of public attitudes toward uterus transplantation, surrogacy and adoption in Japan. PLoS ONE, 14(10), e0223571. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223571
Patel, N. H., Jadeja, Y. D., Bhadarka, H. K., Patel, M. N., Patel, N. H., & Sodagar, N. R. (2018). Insight into different aspects of surrogacy practices. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, 11(3), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_138_17
Poote, A. E., & van den Akker, O. B. (2009). British women’s attitudes to surrogacy. Human Reproduction, 24(1), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/den338
Saadeh, R., Abdulrahim, N., Alfaqih, M., & Khader, Y. (2020). Attitude of Jordanian health care workers toward surrogacy. Journal of Family & Reproductive Health, 14(1), 5–13.
Schanbacher, K. (2014). India’s gestational surrogacy market: An exploitation of poor Uneducated Women. Hastings Women’s LJ, 25, 201.
Schenker, J. G. (2005). Assisted reproduction practice: Religious perspectives. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 10(3), 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61789-0
Söderström-Anttila, V., Wennerholm, U.-B., Loft, A., Pinborg, A., Aittomäki, K., Romundstad, L. B., & Bergh, C. (2016). Surrogacy: Outcomes for surrogate mothers, children and the resulting families—a systematic review. Human Reproduction Update, 22(2), 260–276. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv046
Stöbel-Richter, Y., Goldschmidt, S., Brähler, E., Weidner, K., & Beutel, M. (2009). Egg donation, surrogate mothering, and cloning: Attitudes of men and women in Germany based on a representative survey. Fertility and Sterility, 92(1), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.05.015
Suzuki, K., Hoshi, K., Minai, J., Yanaihara, T., Takeda, Y., & Yamagata, Z. (2006). Analysis of national representative opinion surveys concerning gestational surrogacy in Japan. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 126(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.07.030
Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Boston.
Vandenbrouckel, J. P., von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Gotzsche, P. C., Mulrow, C. D., Pocock, S. J., Poole, C., Schlesselman, J. J., & Egger, M. (2007). Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 4(10), 1628–1655.
Wennberg, A. L., Rodriguez-Wallberg, K. A., Milsom, I., & Brännström, M. (2016). Attitudes toward new assisted reproductive technologies in Sweden: A survey in women 30–39 years of age. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 95(1), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12781
Zoloth, L., & Henning, A. A. (2010). Bioethics and oncofertility: Arguments and insights from religious traditions. Oncofertility. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6518-9_20
Golinkin, D. (2012). "What does Jewish law have to say about conceiving children through surrogacy?" Responsa in a Moment, 7(3). https://schechter.edu/what-does-jewish-law-have-to-say-about-surrogacy-responsa-in-a-moment-volume-7-issue-no-3-december-2012/
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank all participants for engaging in this study.
Funding
No financial support was received by any of the authors for the research of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yıldız, M., Felix, E.O., Ademiju, O. et al. Attitudes of Different Religions Toward Surrogacy: Analysis of 11 Countries' Situation Using Machine Learning Approach and Artificial Neural Networks. J Relig Health 62, 3230–3251 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-023-01782-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-023-01782-y