Abstract
Despite AI women’s cancer disparities being a public health concern, a dearth of research on this populations’ spiritual coping poses a barrier to redressing such disparities. The purpose of this article was to explore AI women cancer survivors’ spiritual and religious coping. This qualitative descriptive study included a sample of 43 AI women cancer survivors. Qualitative content analysis revealed that 93% of AI women cancer survivors used a variety of AI spiritual coping, religious coping, and/or a mixture of the two. Results reveal the prevalence of AI spiritual coping, with traditional AI spiritual practices being particularly common.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Best, M., Butow, P., & Olver, I. (2015). Do patients want doctors to talk about spirituality? A systematic literature review. Patient Education and Counseling, 98(11), 1320–1328.
Buchwald, D., Beals, J., & Manson, S. M. (2000). Use of traditional health practices among native Americans in a primary care setting. Medical Care, 38(12), 1191–1199.
Bureau of Indian Affairs. (2019). Mission statement. https://www.bia.gov/bia.
Burnette, C. E., & Figley, C. R. (2017). Historical oppression, resilience, and transcendence: Can a holistic framework help explain violence experienced by indigenous people? Social Work, 62(1), 37–44.
Espey, D. K., Jim, M. A., Cobb, N., Bartholomew, M., Becker, T., Haverkamp, D., et al. (2014). Leading causes of death and all-cause mortality in American Indians and Alaska Natives. American Journal of Public Health, 104(S3), S303–S311.
Evans-Campbell, T. (2008). Historical trauma in American Indian/Native Alaska communities. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(3), 316–338.
Harper, S. S., & Entrekin, C. M. (2006). Violence against native women: A guide for practitioner action. (No. (Grant No.) 96-VF-GX-K005). Washington, DC: Office on Violence Against Women and the National Center on Full Faith and Credit.
Irwin, L. (1997). Freedom, law, and prophecy: A brief history of Native American religious resistance. American Indian Quarterly, 21(1), 35–55.
Kalish, N. (2012). Evidence-based spiritual care: A literature review. Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care, 6(2), 242–246. https://doi.org/10.1097/spc.0b013e328353811c.
Marbella, A. M., Harris, M. C., Diehr, S., Ignace, G., & Ignace, G. (1998). Use of native American healers among native American patients in an urban Native American health center. Archives of Family Medicine, 7(2), 182–185.
Milne, J., & Oberele, K. (2005). Enhancing rigor in qualitative description: A case study. Journal of Wound Ostomy, and Continence Nurses, 32, 413–420.
Portman, T. A., & Garrett, M. T. (2006). Native American healing traditions. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 53(4), 453–469.
QSR International Pty Ltd. (2015). NVivo qualitative data analysis software, version 11.
Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:43.0.CO;2-G.
Shelley, B. M., Sussman, A. L., Williams, R. L., Segal, A. R., Crabtree, B. F., & Rios Net Clinicians. (2009). ‘They don’t ask me so I don’t tell them’: Patient-clinician communication about traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine. Annals of Family Medicine, 7(2), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.947.
Struthers, R., & Eschiti, V. S. (2004). The experience of indigenous traditional healing and cancer. Integrative Cancer Therapies, 3(1), 13–23.
Sullivan-Bolyai, S., Bova, C., & Harper, D. (2005). Developing and refining interventions in persons with health disparities: The use of qualitative description. Nursing Outlook, 53, 127–133.
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. (2004). Native American health care disparities briefing: Executive summary. Washington, DC: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
Vallurupalli, M., Lauderdale, K., Balboni, M. J., Phelps, A. C., Block, S. D., Ng, A. K., et al. (2012). The role of spirituality and religious coping in the quality of life of patients with advanced cancer receiving palliative radiation therapy. The Journal of Supportive Oncology, 10(2), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suponc.2011.09.003.
Funding
This research was supported by funding from the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (U54MD008164 by Elliott) from the National Institutes of Health to Soonhee Roh, PhD. This work was also supported, in part, by Award K12HD043451 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institutes of Health (Krousel-Wood-PI; Catherine McKinley-Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women’s Health (BIRCWH) Scholar). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIA or the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Finally, this work was supported in part by U54 GM104940 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health, which funds the Louisiana Clinical and Translational Science Center. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SR is responsible for the overall content as a guarantor. All authors (i.e., Dr. CM, Dr. SR, and Dr. Y-SL) significantly contributed to the following article components: (a) conceptualization of the research goals and aims; (b) methodology, including its design and development; (c) validation, such as the adherence to the fidelity to the methodology and its reproducibility; (d) formal analysis, including data analysis of the raw data and its organization; (e) resources, including analysis tools and computing resources; (f) article writing, including the original draft and its revisions. Dr. SR oversaw supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition, whereas Dr. Roh and Dr. Lee were involved in the investigation of the research process, specifically the data collection component.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The approvals of the following Institutional Review Boards were obtained prior to data collection: (a) University of South Dakota, (b) Avera McKennan Hospital, (c) Rapid City Regional Health, and (d) Sanford Research center.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McKinley, C.E., Roh, S. & Lee, YS. American Indian Women Cancer Survivors’ Spiritual and Religious Coping Practices. J Relig Health 59, 2430–2441 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-020-01023-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-020-01023-6