Skip to main content
Log in

The Pornography Debate: Religiosity and Support for Censorship

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pornography has become an increasingly salient topic in public discourse. We sought to better understand the role of religiosity in shaping people’s support of policy stances against pornography, in the form of censorship, using nationally representative data from the 2014 General Social Survey (n = 1676). Results from logistic regression indicate that high religiosity significantly increases odds of supporting censorship. Holding control variables at their sample means, the least religious persons had a predicted probability of 0.09 of supporting censorship, compared to 0.57 for the most religious respondents. We discuss these findings within the context of the current public health debate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Kort Prince for helpful feedback on the methods and analysis sections of this article.

Funding

The authors declare no funding was received for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian A. Droubay.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Because this study utilized publicly available secondary data, formal consent was not required nor was institutional review board approval sought after.

Informed Consent

For this manuscript, the authors utilized secondary data from a long-standing, publicly available, nationally representative survey, i.e., the General Social Survey. Because no original data were collected, informed consent was not sought after nor required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Droubay, B.A., Butters, R.P. & Shafer, K. The Pornography Debate: Religiosity and Support for Censorship. J Relig Health 60, 1652–1667 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-0732-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-0732-x

Keywords

Navigation