Bibliometrics is a high-demand and fast-growing statistical area for the analysis of scientific literature in a certain field. Although religion and health (R&H) field has been a developing study area in recent years, only a few bibliometric studies have been published on the literature in R&H. In this study, we aimed to perform bibliometric analysis of the health literature related to the most populous Abrahamic religions during the period of 1975–2017 by using Web of Science database including WoS Collection Core Collection, Korean Journal Database, Russian Science Citation Index and SciELO Citation Index. In overall evaluation, the USA ranked first in publication productivity with 1388 items and covered 37.21% of total literature. The Journal of Religion and Health published the highest number of documents (n = 351). We found a total of 1329 items in health and Christianity field, and the USA was the most productive country followed by the UK and Canada (n = 166 and 63 documents, respectively). Loma Linda University was found to publish the highest number of items. We detected 1965 publications in Islam and health area, and top three countries were the USA, the UK and Saudi Arabia (n = 387, 194 and 137 items, respectively). University of London was the most productive institution (n = 72, 3.67%). A total of 436 articles were detected in Judaism and health. Top three countries in productivity were the UK, Israel and the UK (211, 151 and 36 items, respectively). Hebrew University of Jerusalem produced 17.43% of total documents as the topmost institution. Although Abrahamic religions originated from Middle East, we noted that most productive authors in this field were not Middle Eastern and from developed countries. Researchers from developing or least developed countries should be encouraged to carry out more studies in R&H field.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Alive and Well—Special Report, Judaism and the Jews. (2012). The Economist (Special Report, July 28th 2012): 1–9. http://www.economist.com/sites/default/files/20120728_judaism.pdf. Accessed on January 15, 2018.
Damiano, R. F., Costa L. A., Viana M. T. S. A., Moreira-Almeida, A., Lucchetti A. L. G., Lucchetti, G. (2016). Brazilian scientific articles on “Spirituality, Religion and Health”. Archives of Clinical Psychiatry (São Paulo), 43(1), 11–16.
GunnMap. GunnMap 2. http://lert.co.nz/map/. Accessed on January 12, 2018.
Hackett, C., Grim, B., Stonawski, M., Skirbekk, V., Potančoková, M., & Abel, G. (2012). The global religious landscape. A report on the size and distribution of the world’s major religious groups as of 2010. Washington, DC. https://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/centers/jesinst/pdf/Grim-globalReligion-full.pdf. Accessed on January 3, 2018.
Haustein, S. (2012). Multidimensional journal evaluation: Analyzing scientific periodicals beyond the impact factor. Munich: De Gruyter/Saur.
Ho, N., & Prasad, V. (2013). Probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics and naturally fermented foods: Why more may be more. Annals of Gastroenterology, 26(3), 277–278.
Hughes, A. W. (2012). Abrahamic religions: On the uses and abuses of history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lucchetti, G., & Lucchetti, A. L. G. (2014). Spirituality, religion, and health: Over the last 15 years of field research (1999–2013). The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 48(3), 199–215.
Mark Clarfield, A., Gordon, M., Markwell, H., & Alibhai, S. M. H. (2003). Ethical issues in end-of-life geriatric care: The approach of three monotheistic religions—Judaism, Catholicism, and Islam. JAGS, 51, 1149–1154.
Şenel, E., & Demir, E. (2018). Bibliometric and scientometric analysis of the articles published in the journal of religion and health between 1975 and 2016. Journal of Religion and Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-017-0539-1.
Tague-Sutcliffe, J. (1992). An introduction to informetrics. Information Processing and Management, 28(1), 1–3.
Van Biema, D., et al. (2002). The legacy of Abraham. TIME, 160(14), 64.
Vosviewer. (2017). VOSviewer—Visualizing scientific landscapes. http://www.vosviewer.com/. Accessed on October 22, 2017.
Conflict of interest
Author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
About this article
Cite this article
Şenel, E. Health and Religions: A Bibliometric Analysis of Health Literature Related to Abrahamic Religions Between 1975 and 2017. J Relig Health 57, 1996–2012 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-0665-4