Skip to main content
Log in

Religion, Nonreligion, and Deviance: Comparing Faith’s and Family’s Relative Strength in Promoting Social Conformity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The view that religion, as a source of moral guidance and social support, can function to prevent or protect individuals, especially children and adolescents, from a range of deviant and delinquent behaviors is largely (but not completely) born out in the literature. In nations with strong religious identities such as the USA, there is a normative expectation that adolescents who identify with religion are less likely to engage in deviant behavior than those who claim no religion. The present study explores this issue using data from over 10,000 American middle school and high school youth to examine the relationship between religion, nonreligion, and various forms of deviance. Results indicate that youth who identify with a religious (rather than nonreligious) label are not less likely to be involved in deviant acts after controlling for protective factors. The effects from some of these protective factors are significant and stronger than the effects from religion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The responses available for the first four indicators were: most of the time, often, some of the time, not often, and never. The responses for the other four indicators were: never, before but not in past year, a few times in past year, once or twice a month, once or twice a week, and almost every day. These responses were reverse-coded for the first six questions listed above so that higher values corresponded to a stronger parental relationship for all indicators.

  2. Religiosity is a more complex issue than we can account for here. For the purpose of the present analysis, we are largely conceptualizing it in terms of religious identification and frequency of religious activity, as measured by church attendance. We do not presume that faith, specific beliefs, or other cognitive dimensions of religiosity are captured by this measure.

  3. Although there is a significant relationship between religious identification and attending worship services, the effect is by no means absolute. In eighth grade, for example, 33% of students identifying as atheist, agnostic, or otherwise without a religion reported at least occasionally attending worship. Thus, although these variables are related, they measure different concepts (belief vs. actions, for one) and provide different data. Collinearity statistics for the regression models indicate only trivial overlap.

References

  • Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (2015). Constructions of deviance: Social power, context, and interaction (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahr, S. J., Hawks, R. D., & Wang, G. (1993). Family and religious influences on adolescent substance abuse. Youth and Society, 24(4), 443–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baier, C., & Wright, B. (2001). If you love me, keep my commandments”: A meta-analysis of the effect of religion on crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beit-Hallahmi, B. (2010). Morality and immorality among the irreligious. In P. Zuckerman (Ed.), Atheism and secularity. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beit-Hallahmi, B. (2015). Psychological perspectives on religion and religiosity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beit-Hallahmi, B., & Argyle, M. (1997). The psychology of religious behavior, belief and experience. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, A., Van Olphen, J., Eliason, M., Howell, R., & Gonzalez, A. (2014). Re-examining religiosity as a protective factor: Comparing alcohol use by self-identified religious, spiritual, and secular college students. Journal of Religion and Health, 53(2), 305–316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caribé, A. C., Nunez, R., Montal, D., Ribeiro, L., Sarmento, S., Quarantini, L. C., et al. (2012). Religiosity as a protective factor in suicidal behavior: A case–control study. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 200(10), 863–867.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cimino, R., & Smith, C. (2014). Atheist awakening: Secular activism and community in America. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Didyoung, J., Charles, E., & Roland, N. (2013). Non-theists are no less moral than theists: Some preliminary results. Secularism and Nonreligion, 2, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgell, P., Gerteis, J., & Hartmann, D. (2006). Atheists as “Other”: Moral boundaries and cultural membership in American society. American Sociological Review, 71(2), 211–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, L. (2002). Denominational differences in self-reported delinquency. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 35(3), 185–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, J. H., Cragun, R. T., Smith, J. M., & Hwang, K. (2012). Forms, frequency, and correlates of perceived anti-atheist discrimination. Secularism and Nonreligion, 1, 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, S. A., & Carlo, G. (2005). Religiosity and prosocial behaviours in adolescence: The mediating role of prosocial values. Journal of Moral Education, 34(2), 231–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. A. (2003). Religiosity and perceived future ascetic deviance and delinquency among Mormon adolescents: Testing the ‘this-worldly’ supernatural sanctions thesis. Sociological Inquiry, 73(1), 28–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, P. C., & Albrecht, G. L. (1977). Hellfire and delinquency revisited. Social Forces, 55, 952–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley, CA: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T., & Stark, R. (1969). Hellfire and delinquency. Social Problems, 17, 202–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hout, M. (2017). Religious ambivalence, liminality, and the increase of no religious preference in the United States, 2006–2014. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 56(1), 52–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longest, K. C., & Vaisey, S. (2008). Control or conviction: Religion and adolescent initiation of marijuana use. Journal of Drug Issues, 38(3), 689–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maimon, D., & Khul, D. C. (2008). Social control and youth suicidality: Situating Durkheim’s ideas in a multilevel framework. American Sociological Review, 73(6), 921–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, C. (2010). Atheism, secularity, the family, and children. In P. Zuckerman (Ed.), Atheism and secularity. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, C. (2015). Losing our religion: How unaffiliated parent are raising their children. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClure, R. F., & Loden, M. (1982). Religious activity, denomination membership and life satisfaction. Psychology: Quarterly Journal of Human Behavior, 9(4), 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L., Wickramaratne, P., Gameroff, M. J., Sage, M., Tenke, C. E., & Weissman, M. M. (2012). Religiosity and major depression in adults at high risk: A ten-year prospective study. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 169(1), 89–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Regnerus, M. D. (2008). Living up to expectations: How religion alters the delinquent behavior of low-risk adolescents. Baylor ISR Report. http://www.baylor.edu/content/services/document.php/25902.pdf.

  • Roberts, K. A. (2004). Religion in sociological perspective (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodek, J., Sekulic, D., & Pasalic, E. (2009). Can we consider religiousness as a protective factor against doping behavior in sport? Journal of Religion and Health, 48(4), 445–453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rostosky, S., Scales, D., Riggle, F., & Ellen, D. B. (2010). Religiosity as a protective factor against heavy episodic drinking (HED) in heterosexual, bisexual, gay, and lesbian young adults. Journal of Homosexuality, 57(8), 1039–1050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, C., Mayer, B., Friedlmeier, M., Lubiewska, K., & Trommsdorff, G. (2011). Religiosity, family orientation, and life satisfaction of adolescents in four countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 1375–1393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saroglou, V., Pichon, I., Trompette, L., Verschueren, M., & Dernelle, R. (2005). Prosocial behavior and religion: new evidence based on projective measures and peer ratings. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44(3), 323–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekulic, D., Kostic, R., Rodek, J., Damjanovic, V., & Ostojic, Z. (2009). Religiousness as a protective factor for substance use in dance sport. Journal of Religion and Health, 48(3), 269–277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sherkat, D. (2014). Changing faith: the dynamics and consequences of Americans’ shifting religious identities. New York: New York University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R., & Bainbridge, W. S. (1996). Religion, crime, and social control. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, W. Lisa, Moak, S. C., & Moore, N. T. (2005). Religion as an insulator of delinquency in school. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 29(2), 217–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, R. (1998). The encyclopedia of politics and religion. Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, K. J., Smith, J. M., Simonson, K., & Myers, B. W. (2015). Familial relationship outcomes of coming out as an atheist. Secularism and Nonreligion, 4(4), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, P. (2013). Atheism and societal health. In S. Bullivant & M. Ruse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of atheism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The data used in this research were collected by the University of Delaware Center for Drug and Health Studies as part of a study supported by the Delaware Health Fund and by the Division of Substance Abuse and Mental Health, Delaware Health and Social Services. The authors wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Whitney DeCamp.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

DeCamp and Smith declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights Statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

DeCamp, W., Smith, J.M. Religion, Nonreligion, and Deviance: Comparing Faith’s and Family’s Relative Strength in Promoting Social Conformity. J Relig Health 58, 206–220 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-0630-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-0630-2

Keywords

Navigation